The US’ self-proclaimed toughest sheriff is fast approaching a crossroads where he must decide either to settle claims that his officers racially profiled Latinos in his trademark immigration patrols — and overhaul his practices — or take his chances at trial.
Arizona’s Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio faces an April 14 deadline for concluding talks with the US Department of Justice to settle a wide range of civil rights allegations, including that the sheriff launched some immigration patrols based on letters from people who complained about people with dark skin congregating in a given area or speaking Spanish, but never reporting an actual crime.
The sheriff has become nationally known for his tough stance against illegal immigration.
A settlement could lead to changes long sought by Arpaio’s critics and short-circuit a separate racial profiling case set for trial this summer. Most police agencies facing similar pressures from the Justice Department opt to settle, but critics wonder whether the sheriff’s stubborn streak — a quality that endears him to his supporters — will lead him to confront the allegations in court.
“It makes him a hero,” said Antonio Bustamante, a Phoenix, Arizona, civil rights attorney and member of a group of Latino and black American leaders calling for an overhaul of Arpaio’s policies. “We have a different character as a sheriff.”
The department says Arpaio’s office has racially profiled Latinos, punished Hispanic jail inmates for speaking Spanish and has a culture of disregard for basic constitutional rights.
The sheriff’s office has denied allegations of systematic discriminatory policing and asked federal authorities to provide facts. However, it also conditionally agreed to talk with the department about ways to correct any violations.
The department is seeking an agreement that would require the sheriff’s office to train officers in how to make constitutional traffic stops, collect data on people arrested in traffic stops and reach out to Latinos to ensure them that police are there to also protect them.
The federal agency has said it is prepared to sue Arpaio and let a judge decide the matter if no agreement can be worked out. Earlier in the three-year investigation, the department filed a lawsuit in 2010 against the sheriff, saying that his office refused to fully cooperate with a request for records and access to jails and employees. The case was settled last summer after the sheriff’s office handed over records and gave access to employees and jails.
After his lawyers attended a negotiation session in early February, Arpaio’s office said both sides agreed to work on an agreement and were committed to avoiding unnecessary litigation.
The status of negotiations since the February meeting is unknown. Arpaio’s lawyers did not return messages seeking comment and the department declined to provide an update, other than saying negotiations are continuing.
Arpaio said he did not know how the case would be resolved, but that his lawyers are trying to cooperate.
“We’ll just have to look at the big picture and see what they want and see if we agree to it,” Arpaio said. “I presume that if we don’t agree, they’ll go to court.”
Separate from the department’s allegations, a lawsuit that says Arpaio’s deputies racially profiled Latinos in immigration patrols is scheduled for a July 19 trial in federal court.
A group of Latinos who filed the lawsuit say that officers based some traffic stops on the race of the drivers in the vehicles and made the stops so they could inquire about the driver’s immigration status. Arpaio denies racial profiling, saying people pulled over in the sweeps were approached because deputies had probable cause to believe they had committed crimes.
US District Judge Murray Snow, who will decide the lawsuit, has already imposed restrictions on Arpaio’s immigration powers and said at a March 23 court hearing that a settlement in the department’s investigation might make the lawsuit moot.
However, if Arpaio refuses to settle and the federal government follows through on its threat to sue, the profiling lawsuit will go to trial, ensuring that the allegations would be publicly aired a few months before voters would decide whether to give Arpaio a sixth term as sheriff of the county covering the Phoenix area.
Lawyers who have worked in the department’s civil rights division say the targets of such investigations typically are not required to acknowledge wrongdoing as part of settlements.
Arpaio he said his November re-election bid is not a factor in his consideration of whether to settle.
“I don’t care about the politics,” Arpaio said. “I don’t plan things for political reasons.”
Le Tuan Binh keeps his Moroccan soldier father’s tombstone at his village home north of Hanoi, a treasured reminder of a man whose community in Vietnam has been largely forgotten. Mzid Ben Ali, or “Mohammed” as Binh calls him, was one of tens of thousands of North Africans who served in the French army as it battled to maintain its colonial rule of Indochina. He fought for France against the Viet Minh independence movement in the 1950s, before leaving the military — as either a defector or a captive — and making a life for himself in Vietnam. “It’s very emotional for me,”
The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Central Committee is to gather in July for a key meeting known as a plenum, the third since the body of elite decisionmakers was elected in 2022, focusing on reforms amid “challenges” at home and complexities broad. Plenums are important events on China’s political calendar that require the attendance of all of the Central Committee, comprising 205 members and 171 alternate members with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at the helm. The Central Committee typically holds seven plenums between party congresses, which are held once every five years. The current central committee members were elected at the
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi reaffirmed his pledge to replace India’s religion-based marriage and inheritance laws with a uniform civil code if he returns to office for a third term, a move that some minority groups have opposed. In an interview with the Times of India listing his agenda, Modi said his government would push for making the code a reality. “It is clear that separate laws for communities are detrimental to the health of society,” he said in the interview published yesterday. “We cannot be a nation where one community is progressing with the support of the Constitution while the other
CODIFYING DISCRIMINATION: Transgender people would be sentenced to three years in prison, while same-sex relations could land a person in jail for more than a decade Iraq’s parliament on Saturday passed a bill criminalizing same-sex relations, which would receive a sentence of up to 15 years in prison, in a move rights groups condemned as an “attack on human rights.” Transgender people would be sentenced to three years’ jail under the amendments to a 1988 anti-prostitution law, which were adopted during a session attended by 170 of 329 lawmakers. A previous draft had proposed capital punishment for same-sex relations, in what campaigners had called a “dangerous” escalation. The new amendments enable courts to sentence people engaging in same-sex relations to 10 to 15 years in prison, according to the