Thu, Mar 17, 2011 - Page 5 News List

JAPAN DISASTER: Pacific likely to absorb most radiation, for now

THE NECESSITIES:Despite government assurances that radiation levels are safe, some Russians are stocking up on wine and seaweed, as they think it protects the body

AP, CHICAGO

Seen from an HH-60G helicopter, a house drifts in the ocean east of Sendai, Japan, in this US Air Force handout photo taken on Monday.

Photo: Reuters

It’s a big ocean between northeastern Japan and the US and thousands of kilometers from the crippled nuclear power plant to much of Asia.

That means there’s little chance — at least for now — that radiation from the shattered reactors could pose a serious threat to the wider world.

Experts say the amount of radioactivity emitted by the facility is relatively minor and should dissipate quickly over the Pacific Ocean.

“Every mile of ocean it crosses, the more it disperses,” said Peter Caracappa, a radiation safety officer and clinical assistant professor of nuclear engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, New York.

However, as crews who were trying to prevent a meltdown abandoned the plant to save their own lives, questions remained about just how much radiation levels would rise and where that toxic material would go.

All along, those at immediate risk were workers inside the plant and the people living closest to it.

If the water level in fuel storage ponds drops to the level of the fuel, a worker standing at the railing looking down on the pool would receive a lethal dose within seconds, according to a study by the Millstone nuclear plant in Connecticut.

Such intense radiation can prevent workers from approaching the reactor or turn their tasks “into suicide missions,” said David Lochbaum, a nuclear engineer who heads the nuclear safety program of the Union of Concerned Scientists.

Next in the line of danger would be those who live within a 32km radius. Areas around the plant have been evacuated for that reason.

“The odds of someone outside the plant getting an acute injury — sick in the next couple of weeks — is close to zero,” said John Moulder, a professor of radiation oncology at the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee who studies the effects of radiation exposure.

The radioactive particles probably contain materials linked to cancer in high doses, including cesium and iodine. The long-term cancer risk for nearby residents will depend on exposure and cleanup efforts, Moulder said.

Radioactive cesium and iodine can also combine with the salt in seawater to become sodium iodide and cesium chloride, which are common elements that would readily dilute in the wide expanse of the Pacific, according to Steven Reese, director of the Radiation Center at Oregon State.

Winds in the area are currently blowing toward the coast because of a winter storm, but that will change to a brisk wind blowing away out to sea at least through yesterday, he said by telephone.

Still, the forecast offered little comfort to those living in the area — and in nearby countries such as Russia.

The Russian Emergencies Ministry said it was monitoring radiation levels and had recorded no increase.

Many Russians, however, distrust the reassurances, perhaps remembering the Chernobyl disaster 25 years ago and how long it took the Soviet government to reveal the true dangers of the radiation.

“The mass media tells us that the wind is blowing the other way, that radiation poses no threat, but people are a mess,” Valentina Chupina, a nanny in Vladivostok, said in a comment posted on the Web site of the newspaper Delovoi Peterburg. “They don’t believe that if something happens we’ll be warned.”

The news portal Lenta said that in addition to potassium iodide and instruments used to measure radiation, people in the Far East were also stocking up on red wine and seaweed, which they believed would offer protection from radiation.

This story has been viewed 4518 times.
TOP top