The latest international deal on climate, reached early on Saturday after days of hard bargaining, was described by exhausted delegates as a “step forward” in grappling with global warming. If they step too far, however, they’re going to bump into an elephant in the room.
That would be the US Republican Party and nobody at the Cancun meetings wanted to talk about the impending Republican takeover of the US House of Representatives. It essentially rules out any new, legally binding pact requiring the US and other major emitters of global warming gases to reduce their emissions.
In endless hours of speeches at the annual UN climate conference, the US political situation was hardly mentioned, despite its crucial role in how the world will confront what the Cancun final documents called “one of the greatest challenges of our time.”
Not everyone held their tongue. Seas rising from warming, and threatening their homes, got Pacific Islanders talking.
Nauru President Marcus Stephen spoke despairingly of “governments deadlocked because of ideological divisions.”
Tuvalu Deputy Prime Minister Enele Sopoaga referred to the “backward politics” of one unnamed developed nation.
A US friend, Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi told a large gathering here: “The key thing for us is not whether the American Congress is controlled by this or that party,” but that richer nations help the developing world with financial support — for clean energy sources, new seawalls, new water systems and other projects to try to stem and cope with climate change and the droughts, floods, disease and extreme weather it portends.
“Which party” does matter, however. Many Republicans dismiss scientific evidence of human-caused warming, citing arguments by skeptics that the large majority of scientists are wrong or that the consequences of warming are overstated.
Early in the two-week conference here, four Republican members of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee sent a letter to US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton demanding a freeze on about US$3 billion in planned US climate aid for this year and next year.
The senators said some findings of the UN’s climate change panel “were found to be exaggerated or simply not true” and said that at a time of record US budget deficits, “no American taxpayer dollars should be committed to a global climate fund based on information that is not accurate.”
The leader of the protest, Senator John Barrasso, called the financing an “international climate change bailout.”
What will they call the long-term finance plan embraced at the Cancun conference, for US$100 billion a year in US and other international climate financing by 2020?
Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg, who with Zenawi co-chaired a UN panel on climate financing, was asked how this US opposition can be overcome.
“I believe that many things might happen in American politics in a period of 10 years,” he replied.
Such long, wishful views have dominated the climate talks for two decades, as the US remained outside the 1997 Kyoto Protocol and the modest mandatory reductions in emissions that other industrial nations accepted.
For the world to agree on a new, all-encompassing treaty with deeper cuts to succeed Kyoto, whose targets expire in 2012, the US Congress must pass legislation to cap US industrial emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
Instead, the Cancun talks, waiting for another day, focused on small steps on climate: Some advances in establishing a system to compensate developing nations for protecting their forests, for example, and in setting up a global clearinghouse for “green” technology for developing nations.
Cancun’s chief accomplishment was to decide to create, with details to come, a Green Climate Fund that will handle those expected tens of billions of dollars in climate support.
This slowly, slowly approach began at the climate summit in Copenhagen last year, when the US, China, other big emitters and some small ones pledged to carry out voluntary reductions in emissions.
Some say this will be the way global warming will be addressed, not with “topdown,” legally binding treaties, but with self-assigned targets, bilateral deals to help create low-carbon economies and aspirational goals set by G20 summits. If the world busies itself with such voluntary activities, this thinking goes, it may all add up to climate protection.
However, scientists do numbers better than politicians. And the latest UN scientific calculation shows that the current emissions--reduction pledges, even if all are fulfilled, will barely get the world halfway to keeping temperatures rising to dangerous levels. The US pledge — based on executive, not congressional action — is for a mere 3 percent reduction of emissions below 1990 levels.
If too little is done, the UN science network foresees temperatures rising by up to 6.4oC by 2100. In a timely reminder of what’s at stake, NASA reported last week that January to November this year was the warmest globally in the 131-year record.
At that rate, climate will become the elephant no one can ignore.
Far from the violence ravaging Haiti, a market on the border with the Dominican Republic has maintained a welcome degree of normal everyday life. At the Dajabon border gate, a wave of Haitians press forward, eager to shop at the twice-weekly market about 200km from Haiti’s capital, Port-au-Prince. They are drawn by the market’s offerings — food, clothing, toys and even used appliances — items not always readily available in Haiti. However, with gang violence bad and growing ever worse in Haiti, the Dominican government has reinforced the usual military presence at the border and placed soldiers on alert. While the market continues to
An image of a dancer balancing on the words “China Before Communism” looms over Parisian commuters catching the morning metro, signaling the annual return of Shen Yun, a controversial spectacle of traditional Chinese dance mixed with vehement criticism of Beijing and conservative rhetoric. The Shen Yun Performing Arts company has slipped the beliefs of a spiritual movement called Falun Gong in between its technicolored visuals and leaping dancers since 2006, with advertising for the show so ubiquitous that it has become an Internet meme. Founded in 1992, Falun Gong claims nearly 100 million followers and has been subject to “persistent persecution” in
ONLINE VITRIOL: While Mo Yan faces a lawsuit, bottled water company Nongfu Spring and Tsinghua University are being attacked amid a rise in nationalist fervor At first glance, a Nobel prize winning author, a bottle of green tea and Beijing’s Tsinghua University have little in common, but in recent weeks they have been dubbed by China’s nationalist netizens as the “three new evils” in the fight to defend the country’s valor in cyberspace. Last month, a patriotic blogger called Wu Wanzheng filed a lawsuit against China’s only Nobel prize-winning author, Mo Yan (莫言), accusing him of discrediting the Communist army and glorifying Japanese soldiers in his fictional works set during the Japanese invasion of China. Wu, who posts online under the pseudonym “Truth-Telling Mao Xinghuo,” is seeking
‘SURPRISES’: The militants claim to have successfully tested a missile capable of reaching Mach 8 and vowed to strike ships heading toward the Cape of Good Hope Yemen’s Houthi rebels claim to have a new, hypersonic missile in their arsenal, Russia’s state media reported on Thursday, potentially raising the stakes in their attacks on shipping in the Red Sea and surrounding waterways against the backdrop of Israel’s war with Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The report by the state-run RIA Novosti news agency cited an unidentified official, but provided no evidence for the claim. It comes as Moscow maintains an aggressively counter-Western foreign policy amid its grinding war on Ukraine. However, the Houthis have for weeks hinted about “surprises” they plan for the battles at sea to counter the