The latest international deal on climate, reached early on Saturday after days of hard bargaining, was described by exhausted delegates as a “step forward” in grappling with global warming. If they step too far, however, they’re going to bump into an elephant in the room.
That would be the US Republican Party and nobody at the Cancun meetings wanted to talk about the impending Republican takeover of the US House of Representatives. It essentially rules out any new, legally binding pact requiring the US and other major emitters of global warming gases to reduce their emissions.
In endless hours of speeches at the annual UN climate conference, the US political situation was hardly mentioned, despite its crucial role in how the world will confront what the Cancun final documents called “one of the greatest challenges of our time.”
Not everyone held their tongue. Seas rising from warming, and threatening their homes, got Pacific Islanders talking.
Nauru President Marcus Stephen spoke despairingly of “governments deadlocked because of ideological divisions.”
Tuvalu Deputy Prime Minister Enele Sopoaga referred to the “backward politics” of one unnamed developed nation.
A US friend, Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi told a large gathering here: “The key thing for us is not whether the American Congress is controlled by this or that party,” but that richer nations help the developing world with financial support — for clean energy sources, new seawalls, new water systems and other projects to try to stem and cope with climate change and the droughts, floods, disease and extreme weather it portends.
“Which party” does matter, however. Many Republicans dismiss scientific evidence of human-caused warming, citing arguments by skeptics that the large majority of scientists are wrong or that the consequences of warming are overstated.
Early in the two-week conference here, four Republican members of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee sent a letter to US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton demanding a freeze on about US$3 billion in planned US climate aid for this year and next year.
The senators said some findings of the UN’s climate change panel “were found to be exaggerated or simply not true” and said that at a time of record US budget deficits, “no American taxpayer dollars should be committed to a global climate fund based on information that is not accurate.”
The leader of the protest, Senator John Barrasso, called the financing an “international climate change bailout.”
What will they call the long-term finance plan embraced at the Cancun conference, for US$100 billion a year in US and other international climate financing by 2020?
Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg, who with Zenawi co-chaired a UN panel on climate financing, was asked how this US opposition can be overcome.
“I believe that many things might happen in American politics in a period of 10 years,” he replied.
Such long, wishful views have dominated the climate talks for two decades, as the US remained outside the 1997 Kyoto Protocol and the modest mandatory reductions in emissions that other industrial nations accepted.
For the world to agree on a new, all-encompassing treaty with deeper cuts to succeed Kyoto, whose targets expire in 2012, the US Congress must pass legislation to cap US industrial emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
Instead, the Cancun talks, waiting for another day, focused on small steps on climate: Some advances in establishing a system to compensate developing nations for protecting their forests, for example, and in setting up a global clearinghouse for “green” technology for developing nations.
Cancun’s chief accomplishment was to decide to create, with details to come, a Green Climate Fund that will handle those expected tens of billions of dollars in climate support.
This slowly, slowly approach began at the climate summit in Copenhagen last year, when the US, China, other big emitters and some small ones pledged to carry out voluntary reductions in emissions.
Some say this will be the way global warming will be addressed, not with “topdown,” legally binding treaties, but with self-assigned targets, bilateral deals to help create low-carbon economies and aspirational goals set by G20 summits. If the world busies itself with such voluntary activities, this thinking goes, it may all add up to climate protection.
However, scientists do numbers better than politicians. And the latest UN scientific calculation shows that the current emissions--reduction pledges, even if all are fulfilled, will barely get the world halfway to keeping temperatures rising to dangerous levels. The US pledge — based on executive, not congressional action — is for a mere 3 percent reduction of emissions below 1990 levels.
If too little is done, the UN science network foresees temperatures rising by up to 6.4oC by 2100. In a timely reminder of what’s at stake, NASA reported last week that January to November this year was the warmest globally in the 131-year record.
At that rate, climate will become the elephant no one can ignore.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is to visit Russia next month for a summit of the BRICS bloc of developing economies, Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) said on Thursday, a move that comes as Moscow and Beijing seek to counter the West’s global influence. Xi’s visit to Russia would be his second since the Kremlin sent troops into Ukraine in February 2022. China claims to take a neutral position in the conflict, but it has backed the Kremlin’s contentions that Russia’s action was provoked by the West, and it continues to supply key components needed by Moscow for
Japan scrambled fighter jets after Russian aircraft flew around the archipelago for the first time in five years, Tokyo said yesterday. From Thursday morning to afternoon, the Russian Tu-142 aircraft flew from the sea between Japan and South Korea toward the southern Okinawa region, the Japanese Ministry of Defense said in a statement. They then traveled north over the Pacific Ocean and finished their journey off the northern island of Hokkaido, it added. The planes did not enter Japanese airspace, but flew over an area subject to a territorial dispute between Japan and Russia, a ministry official said. “In response, we mobilized Air Self-Defense
CRITICISM: ‘One has to choose the lesser of two evils,’ Pope Francis said, as he criticized Trump’s anti-immigrant policies and Harris’ pro-choice position Pope Francis on Friday accused both former US president Donald Trump and US Vice President Kamala Harris of being “against life” as he returned to Rome from a 12-day tour of the Asia-Pacific region. The 87-year-old pontiff’s comments on the US presidential hopefuls came as he defied health concerns to connect with believers from the jungle of Papua New Guinea to the skyscrapers of Singapore. It was Francis’ longest trip in duration and distance since becoming head of the world’s nearly 1.4 billion Roman Catholics more than 11 years ago. Despite the marathon visit, he held a long and spirited
The pitch is a classic: A young celebrity with no climbing experience spends a year in hard training and scales Mount Everest, succeeding against some — if not all — odds. French YouTuber Ines Benazzouz, known as Inoxtag, brought the story to life with a two-hour-plus documentary about his year preparing for the ultimate challenge. The film, titled Kaizen, proved a smash hit on its release last weekend. Young fans queued around the block to get into a preview screening in Paris, with Inoxtag’s management on Monday saying the film had smashed the box office record for a special cinema