The waiter serves up a generous helping of hyperbole with his sales patter as he points to a giant garoupa gawping out of the glass of a neon-lit fish tank on the pavement outside a seafront restaurant in Hong Kong.
“This is a very special fish. It is more than 100 years old,” he says, gesturing to the fish struggling to turn its 1m-long body in the confines of the tank.
“If you want to eat it, it will cost you around HK$500,000 [US$64,500]. You will need a very big party,” he said.
For months now, this magnificent creature has been on show to passers-by, working its way onto hundreds of snapshots as it tries to circle in the tank that suddenly became its home after decades cruising the inky, limitless depths of the Indian Ocean.
Capture brought no quick death for this and dozens of other large exotic fish crammed into tanks lining the pavement in seafood restaurants across Hong Kong and Asia.
The taste among Asian diners for exotic fish appears defiantly recession-proof. Falling fish stocks and rising prices have if anything, it seems, sharpened people’s appetite for luxury seafood.
However, the increasingly popular practice of enticing customers to restaurants with the display of huge fish in small tanks is troubling animal welfare experts.
The Society for the Protection of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) in Hong Kong has likened it to the way caged leopards or shackled elephants were displayed in the region’s colonial days.
SPCA executive director Sandy Macalister said of the display of garoupa in Hong Kong’s restaurants: “These wonderful animals, which since the 1940s have lived and bred in the coral depths, now lie behind thick distorting glass in a narrow tank on the footpath.”
“If a passerby or a restaurant patron knew that these magnificent creatures were more than 65 years old, would that make a difference?” she said.
Macalister said laws should be changed to stop big fish being put on public display in cramped conditions by restaurants.
“The problem is that until very recently, no one has really understood fish in the same way that no one understands lobsters and crabs,” she said.
“In fact they have sophisticated brains, and animal welfare science shows that they are feeling things we never knew they felt,” she said. “Some of those fish you see outside restaurants have probably been around since the 1940s. They are used to swimming around freely in the depths. The next thing they know, they are in a tank on a footpath. It’s cruel and it must be terrifying for them.”
Expert research suggests that in spite of common misconceptions, fish have memories and feelings similar to other animals, according to Macalister, meaning that being kept for months or years in a hugely restricted space amounts to a sublime form of torture for a mature adult fish.
“The only thing with a fish is it can’t express it,” he said. “They learn and they have memories, and they can identify people. They feel stress and they feel pain. People used to believe fish couldn’t remember anything for longer than three seconds, but we know now that isn’t true.”
Macalister said that as the law currently stood, it was very difficult for prosecutions to be brought.
“The issue is defining what is too small in terms of a tank,” he said. “If the fish has clean water and he has got the space to move around, then it’s not prosecutable under law.”