The police officer caught on film attacking Ian Tomlinson during the G20 protests in London could face manslaughter charges after a second postmortem concluded that the newspaper vendor died from internal bleeding and not a heart attack.
The dramatic new evidence, made public on Friday, provoked an immediate response from the victim’s family, who said that they had been “badly misled” by police.
It emerged on Friday that the London Metropolitan police officer who was suspended from duty has now been interviewed under caution on suspicion of manslaughter by investigators from the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC).
This came 10 days after the Guardian newspaper first revealed footage of Tomlinson being struck and pushed to the ground minutes before he collapsed and died in the old City of London, the British capital’s financial district.
The New York fund manager who handed the Guardian the video evidence said that he felt vindicated by the findings.
“Now I’m glad I came forward. It’s possible Mr Tomlinson’s death would have been swept under the rug otherwise. You needed something incontrovertible. In this case it was the video,” he said.
Tomlinson, a 47-year-old newspaper vendor, had been attempting to walk home from work the when he collapsed and died at about 7:25pm on April 1. Moments earlier he had been attacked from behind by a constable from the Met’s territorial support group near the Bank of England.
The first postmortem results — which were released by police — said Tomlinson had died of a heart attack. The second postmortem was ordered by the family’s legal team and the IPCC after the footage was broadcast.
Last night’s developments will place enormous pressure on the IPCC. Initially, the watchdog allowed City of London police to conduct its own inquiry, even though witnesses were coming forward to say they had seen Tomlinson being in contact with police.
The second postmortem was conducted Nat Cary, who was able to scrutinize video evidence before conducting his examination. In a statement last night, City of London coroners court said Cary had provisionally concluded that internal bleeding was the cause of Tomlinson’s death.
“Dr Cary’s opinion is that the cause of death was abdominal hemorrhage. The cause of the hemorrhage remains to be ascertained,” he said.
“Dr Cary accepts that there is evidence of coronary atherosclerosis but states that in his opinion its nature and extent is unlikely to have contributed to the cause of death,” Cary said.
Jules Carey, the lawyer acting for Tomlinson’s family, said: “The video footage of the unprovoked and vicious assault on Ian by the police officer would easily justify charges of assault being brought against the officer. The findings of Dr Nat Cary significantly increase the likelihood that the officer will now face the more serious charge of manslaughter.”
On Friday, politicians and campaigners called for the IPCC to conduct its investigation with renewed urgency. London Mayor Boris Johnson said that the watchdog should now come to “a fast and transparent conclusion.”
Liberal Democrat Home Affairs spokesman Chris Huhne, said: “This is an alarming finding. It suggests that Mr Tomlinson’s treatment by the police officer caught on video may have been the final contributing factor in his death. These findings put further pressure on the IPCC to investigate the matter with all urgency.”