A key congressional committee will try to settle the public debate over the CIA’s harsh interrogation program by investigating whether those methods actually worked, US Senate officials said on Thursday.
The Senate Intelligence Committee’s investigation is an attempt to inject fact into an argument that is often shaped by anecdotes and news reports. Officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to disclose details of the committee’s discussions.
US President Barack Obama halted the CIA’s interrogation program last month. The spy agency is now prohibited from employing methods not approved for use by the US military while the program undergoes a White House review to determine whether additional interrogation methods may be necessary.
The Senate committee review seeks to document what actually happened during CIA interrogations and whether valuable information was gained that would not have been obtained otherwise. A report is expected to be released in six months to a year.
The Senate probe is not meant as a first step toward prosecuting CIA officers who used harsh interrogations, the officials said.
Obama administration officials have said they will not seek charges against those who were following guidelines set by the attorney general.
The Intelligence Committee is already investigating the CIA’s destruction in 2007 of videotapes of the interrogation of Abu Zubaydah to encompass the origins and effectiveness of the so-called “enhanced interrogation program” authorized by former US president George W. Bush. Scores of secret documents have already been assembled by the committee.
The CIA’s enhanced interrogation methods are secret. But former CIA director Michael Hayden told reporters in January that the tactics — at one point they included waterboarding, which simulates drowning — were effective in eliciting information from the more hardened terror suspects who are taken prisoner.
The CIA held fewer than 100 prisoners at secret detention sites and used enhanced interrogation techniques on about a third of them, Hayden said. He said just three underwent waterboarding, with 2003 the last time it was used.
“I am convinced that the program got the maximum amount of information, particularly out of that first generation of detainees. The Abu Zubaydahs, the Khalid Sheik Muhammeds,” Hayden said, referring to top al-Qaeda operatives who were detained and questioned with harsh techniques.
“I just can’t conceive of any other way, given their character, given their commitment to what it is they do,” Hayden said.
Current CIA Director Leon Panetta, however, is less convinced.
“My personal view at this stage is that the Army Field Manual gives us all of the tools we need,” Panetta said on Thursday at his first on-the-record meeting with reporters.
Committee member Senator Ron Wyden, a Democrat and a Senate confidante of Obama’s, said last month that declassifying many of the top-secret documents collected for the videotape investigation would reveal whether severe methods yielded useful intelligence and what the legal arguments were for allowing them.
Critics of coercive interrogation programs say they do not work because those subjected to them will say whatever they think the interrogator wants to hear to make the interrogation stop.
Conversely, they say coercive methods can increase resistance because they confirm the prisoner’s preconceived notions about their jailers and increase a sense of righteous martyrdom.
They contend the most effective methods are those that build both dependence and rapport between the subject and the interrogator, making the subject want to provide accurate information.
Advocates of harsh interrogations say some prisoners are trained to resist standard interrogation techniques and only more coercive methods will break their will and convince them that resistance is futile.
They also say sometimes there is not enough time to build a rapport to get needed information, the so-called “ticking bomb” scenario.
As the sun sets on another scorching Yangon day, the hot and bothered descend on the Myanmar city’s parks, the coolest place to spend an evening during yet another power blackout. A wave of exceptionally hot weather has blasted Southeast Asia this week, sending the mercury to 45°C and prompting thousands of schools to suspend in-person classes. Even before the chaos and conflict unleashed by the military’s 2021 coup, Myanmar’s creaky and outdated electricity grid struggled to keep fans whirling and air conditioners humming during the hot season. Now, infrastructure attacks and dwindling offshore gas reserves mean those who cannot afford expensive diesel
Does Argentine President Javier Milei communicate with a ghost dog whose death he refuses to accept? Forced to respond to questions about his mental health, the president’s office has lashed out at “disrespectful” speculation. Twice this week, presidential spokesman Manuel Adorni was asked about Milei’s English Mastiff, Conan, said to have died seven years ago. Milei, 53, had Conan cloned, and today is believed to own four copies he refers to as “four-legged children.” Or is it five? In an interview with CNN this month, Milei referred to his five dogs, whose faces and names he had engraved on the presidential baton. Conan,
Le Tuan Binh keeps his Moroccan soldier father’s tombstone at his village home north of Hanoi, a treasured reminder of a man whose community in Vietnam has been largely forgotten. Mzid Ben Ali, or “Mohammed” as Binh calls him, was one of tens of thousands of North Africans who served in the French army as it battled to maintain its colonial rule of Indochina. He fought for France against the Viet Minh independence movement in the 1950s, before leaving the military — as either a defector or a captive — and making a life for himself in Vietnam. “It’s very emotional for me,”
The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Central Committee is to gather in July for a key meeting known as a plenum, the third since the body of elite decisionmakers was elected in 2022, focusing on reforms amid “challenges” at home and complexities broad. Plenums are important events on China’s political calendar that require the attendance of all of the Central Committee, comprising 205 members and 171 alternate members with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at the helm. The Central Committee typically holds seven plenums between party congresses, which are held once every five years. The current central committee members were elected at the