Iraq and the US have agreed that all US troops will leave by the end of 2011, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said on Monday, but Washington said no final deal had been reached.
“There is an agreement actually reached, reached between the two parties on a fixed date, which is the end of 2011, to end any foreign presence on Iraqi soil,” Maliki said in a speech to tribal leaders in Baghdad’s heavily fortified Green Zone.
“An open time limit is not acceptable in any security deal that governs the presence of the international forces,” he said.
Maliki’s remarks were the most explicit statement yet that the increasingly assertive Iraqi government expects the US presence to end in three years as part of a deal between Washington and Baghdad to allow them to stay beyond this year.
Previously, Iraqi officials have said they want US troops to end patrols of Iraqi towns and villages by the middle of next year and combat troops to leave Iraq by 2011, but Washington has been reluctant to embrace a firm deadline for all troops to go.
A bilateral pact is needed to replace a UN Security Council resolution adopted after the US-led invasion in 2003, which has formed the legal basis for the US troop presence ever since, but expires at the end of this year.
In Washington, State Department spokesman Robert Wood said a draft agreement had been prepared but it needed to “go through a number of levers in the Iraqi political system before we actually have an agreement from the Iraqi side.”
“Until we have a deal, we don’t have a deal,” he said.
US officials declined to comment on Maliki’s 2011 withdrawal date.
Iraqi parliament speaker Mahmud Mashhadani poured further cold water on the pact, saying Iraq’s lawmakers would never endorse it in its current form. The parliamentary stamp is a crucial legal requirement.
“What I understand is that the Iraqi parliament will not pass this agreement,” the Sunni Arab politician said on Monday.
“At this moment the Iraqi government and parliament are not ready for such a deal, which will face a lot of hurdles,” he said.
On Friday, the chief Iraqi negotiator Mohammed al-Haj Hammoud said that the security pact had been finalized by both sides and had already been approved by Bush.
He said that under the 27-point deal all US combat troops would be withdrawn from Iraqi cities by next June ahead of a complete withdrawal by 2011.
Maliki’s Shiite-led government has been increasingly assertive in pushing for a deadline for the roughly 144,000 US troops to leave Iraq, especially since an Iraqi-led crackdown on Shiite militias this year proved a success.
US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said on a visit to Baghdad last week that a deal was close, but not yet final.
Iraqi officials say a draft agreement was completed last week and must now be circulated to political leaders for approval before it can be submitted to parliament next month.
The talks come as violence has dropped to levels not seen in Iraq since 2004, a welcome change that US officials attribute to the 30,000 extra troops US President George W. Bush sent to Iraq last year and to Sunni tribal leaders’ decision to back security efforts.
Maliki said any deal would need to include a “specific date, not an open one” for withdrawal.
He also said the pact would not grant anyone absolute immunity from Iraqi law. Washington wants to protect its soldiers from being tried in Iraqi courts, terms it also requires in many other countries where it has bases.
“We will not accept to put the lives of our sons on the line by guaranteeing absolute immunity for anybody, whether Iraqis or foreigners,” Maliki said. “The sanctity of Iraqi blood should be respected.”
A commitment to withdraw all troops would resemble the plan offered by US Democratic presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama, who proposes withdrawing combat troops by mid-2010.
“Success in Iraq depends on an Iraqi government that is reconciling its differences and taking responsibility for its future and a timetable is the best way to press the Iraqis to do just that,” Obama said. “I welcome the growing convergence around this pragmatic and responsible position.”
Republican presidential contender Senator John McCain said he also believes withdrawals are likely in coming years, but that it would be dangerous to commit in advance to a firm timetable.
“Whenever you win wars, your troops come home. And our troops will be coming home, but it will be dictated by the conditions on the ground and the success or the lack of success,” McCain said at a fundraising lunch in California.
BACKLASH: The National Party quit its decades-long partnership with the Liberal Party after their election loss to center-left Labor, which won a historic third term Australia’s National Party has split from its conservative coalition partner of more than 60 years, the Liberal Party, citing policy differences over renewable energy and after a resounding loss at a national election this month. “Its time to have a break,” Nationals leader David Littleproud told reporters yesterday. The split shows the pressure on Australia’s conservative parties after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s center-left Labor party won a historic second term in the May 3 election, powered by a voter backlash against US President Donald Trump’s policies. Under the long-standing partnership in state and federal politics, the Liberal and National coalition had shared power
NO EXCUSES: Marcos said his administration was acting on voters’ demands, but an academic said the move was emotionally motivated after a poor midterm showing Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr yesterday sought the resignation of all his Cabinet secretaries, in a move seen as an attempt to reset the political agenda and assert his authority over the second half of his single six-year term. The order came after the president’s allies failed to win a majority of Senate seats contested in the 12 polls on Monday last week, leaving Marcos facing a divided political and legislative landscape that could thwart his attempts to have an ally succeed him in 2028. “He’s talking to the people, trying to salvage whatever political capital he has left. I think it’s
Polish presidential candidates offered different visions of Poland and its relations with Ukraine in a televised debate ahead of next week’s run-off, which remains on a knife-edge. During a head-to-head debate lasting two hours, centrist Warsaw Mayor Rafal Trzaskowski, from Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s governing pro-European coalition, faced the Eurosceptic historian Karol Nawrocki, backed by the right-wing populist Law and Justice party (PiS). The two candidates, who qualified for the second round after coming in the top two places in the first vote on Sunday last week, clashed over Poland’s relations with Ukraine, EU policy and the track records of their
UNSCHEDULED VISIT: ‘It’s a very bulky new neighbor, but it will soon go away,’ said Johan Helberg of the 135m container ship that run aground near his house A man in Norway awoke early on Thursday to discover a huge container ship had run aground a stone’s throw from his fjord-side house — and he had slept through the commotion. For an as-yet unknown reason, the 135m NCL Salten sailed up onto shore just meters from Johan Helberg’s house in a fjord near Trondheim in central Norway. Helberg only discovered the unexpected visitor when a panicked neighbor who had rung his doorbell repeatedly to no avail gave up and called him on the phone. “The doorbell rang at a time of day when I don’t like to open,” Helberg told television
RSS