In the week since the Bangladeshi president sent soldiers onto the streets to quell violent political protests, there has been an unexpected turn in public sentiment -- a growing number of people are clamoring for them to stay on and take charge.
It is an option that is still largely discussed in private -- over sweet, milky tea in the back rooms of grimy shops or over whiskey and sodas at upscale dinner parties.
But with the coming election shaping up to be the latest in a string of bloody and chaotic votes, the sentiment is there, even if the military appears unready to make such a move.
"I know it sounds absurd, we fought so hard to end military rule. But what else can we do?" said Faruq Hossain, a 46-year-old Dhaka shop owner. "Everyone knows we're headed for a disaster."
Disasters, natural and man made, have plagued Bangladesh since independence from Pakistan in 1971 and many hoped this crowded and poor country had seen the last of its political calamities when rigidly authoritarian military rule ended in 1990.
The desire to see its return is a testament to the disaster that is Bangladeshi democracy, a violent, deeply corrupt process that centers on two women whose hatred for one another runs so deep they have not said a word to each other for years.
Khaleda Zia, who leads the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, and Sheikh Hasina Wazed, who heads the Awami League, have traded turns as prime minister since democracy was restored, with each handing out government jobs and contracts to their supporters when in power.
With few issues separating their two relatively centrist parties, elections are "all a matter of face and ego and getting to control the patronage of the state for the next five years," said a Western diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he works with both parties.
The vast majority of Bangladesh's 147 million people, meanwhile, have remained mired in grinding poverty, and there is deep frustration as the country finds itself already embroiled in another bloody election season weeks ahead of the vote, slated for Jan. 23.
At least 34 people have been killed since October in protests and street clashes between rival political camps.
Repeated nationwide strikes have brought commerce to a standstill. Hit especially hard are garment factories that are the source of countless J. Crew sweaters and Banana Republic shirts -- and more than 75 percent of Bangladesh's much-needed hard currency.
The scenario most often spelled out in conversations over the past few days with dozens of Bangladeshis is the military taking over for a limited time -- maybe a few months, no more than a few years -- to sort out the chaotic and corrupt political scene.
"The question," said Faruq Sobhan, a former foreign secretary, "is whether they will want to go once they have power."
Others say it is beside the point at this stage.
"I don't see any alternative to the army," said Nazim Kamran Chowdhury, a former lawmaker from Zia's party.
Nor do many others -- a survey of 3,301 conducted this summer found that 51 percent of Bangladeshis thought the country should be governed by the military. No margin of error was given.
"I'm sure the number has grown by now," Chowdhury said. "These two parties have ruined the country, particularly these two ladies."
The politics here are so bitter that the Constitution requires the outgoing government to step down 90 days ahead of an election and a caretaker administration to oversee the vote.
RSS