In twin setbacks for the Bush administration's war on terror, federal appeals courts on opposite coasts ruled that the US military cannot indefinitely hold prisoners without access to lawyers or US courts.
One ruling on Thursday favored the 660 "enemy combatants" being held at the US naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The other involved Jose Padilla, an American who was seized in Chicago in an alleged plot to detonate a radioactive "dirty bomb" and was declared to be an enemy combatant.
In Padilla's case, the New York-based 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals ordered Padilla, a former gang member, released from military custody within 30 days and, if the government chooses, tried in civilian courts. The White House said the government would appeal and seek a stay of the decision.
In the other case, the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that prisoners held at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base should have access to lawyers and the US court system. It was the first such ruling by a federal appeals court anywhere in the country.
"Even in times of national emergency -- indeed, particularly in such times -- it is the obligation of the judicial branch to ensure the preservation of our constitutional values and to prevent the executive branch from running roughshod over the rights of citizens and aliens alike," Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt wrote in ruling in favor of a Libyan captured in Afghanistan and held in Cuba.
The two rulings highlighted tensions between national security and civil rights since the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.
An order by President George W. Bush in November 2001 allows captives to be detained as "enemy combatants" if they are members of al-Qaeda, engage in or aid terrorism, or harbor terrorists. The designation may also be applied if it is "the interest of the United States" to hold an individual during hostilities.
The Justice Department this week said such a classification allows detainees to be held without access to lawyers until US authorities are satisfied they have disclosed everything they know about terrorist operations.
But the New York court ruled 2-1 that Padilla's detention was not authorized by Congress and that the Bush administration could not designate him as an enemy combatant without such approval.
Michael Greenberger, a University of Maryland law professor and former Clinton administration Justice Department official, said the government "is being painted into a corner that is not very favorable. How bad of a corner will be determined by the US Supreme Court."
Padilla, a convert to Islam, was arrested in May last year at Chicago's O'Hare Airport as he returned from Pakistan. Within days, he was moved to the Navy brig in Charleston, South Carolina. The government said he had proposed the bomb plot to Abu Zubaydah, then al-Qaeda's top terrorism coordinator.
In ordering his release from military custody, the court said the government was free to transfer Padilla to civilian authorities who could bring criminal charges. Padilla could also be held as a material witness in connection with grand jury proceedings, the court said.
"As this court sits only a short distance from where the World Trade Center stood, we are as keenly aware as anyone of the threat al-Qaeda poses to our country and of the responsibilities the president and law enforcement officials bear for protecting the nation," Circuit Judge Rosemary Pooler wrote.
"But presidential authority does not exist in a vacuum, and this case involves not whether those responsibilities should be aggressively pursued, but whether the president is obligated, in the circumstances presented here, to share them with Congress," she wrote.
In a dissent, Circuit Judge Richard Wesley said that as commander-in-chief, the president "has the inherent authority to thwart acts of belligerency at home or abroad that would do harm to United States citizens."
Chris Dunn, an attorney with the New York Civil Liberties Union, called the ruling historic.
"It's a repudiation of the Bush administration's attempt to close the federal courts to those accused of terrorism," he said.
The White House said the ruling was inconsistent with the president's constitutional authority as well as with other court rulings.
"The president's most solemn obligation is protecting the American people," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said.
"We believe the 2nd Circuit ruling is troubling and flawed," he said.
Padilla's lawyer, Donna Newman, did not return a call for comment. Newman has battled in court to be able to meet with Padilla; she has not done so since he was designated an enemy combatant the month after his arrest.
Thursday's 2-1 decision in San Francisco was the first federal appeals court ruling to rebuke the Bush administration's position on the Guantanamo detainees, who have been held without charge, some for nearly two years.
The administration maintains that because the 660 men were picked up overseas on suspicion of terrorism and are being held on foreign land, they may be detained indefinitely without charge or trial.
Le Tuan Binh keeps his Moroccan soldier father’s tombstone at his village home north of Hanoi, a treasured reminder of a man whose community in Vietnam has been largely forgotten. Mzid Ben Ali, or “Mohammed” as Binh calls him, was one of tens of thousands of North Africans who served in the French army as it battled to maintain its colonial rule of Indochina. He fought for France against the Viet Minh independence movement in the 1950s, before leaving the military — as either a defector or a captive — and making a life for himself in Vietnam. “It’s very emotional for me,”
The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Central Committee is to gather in July for a key meeting known as a plenum, the third since the body of elite decisionmakers was elected in 2022, focusing on reforms amid “challenges” at home and complexities broad. Plenums are important events on China’s political calendar that require the attendance of all of the Central Committee, comprising 205 members and 171 alternate members with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at the helm. The Central Committee typically holds seven plenums between party congresses, which are held once every five years. The current central committee members were elected at the
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi reaffirmed his pledge to replace India’s religion-based marriage and inheritance laws with a uniform civil code if he returns to office for a third term, a move that some minority groups have opposed. In an interview with the Times of India listing his agenda, Modi said his government would push for making the code a reality. “It is clear that separate laws for communities are detrimental to the health of society,” he said in the interview published yesterday. “We cannot be a nation where one community is progressing with the support of the Constitution while the other
CODIFYING DISCRIMINATION: Transgender people would be sentenced to three years in prison, while same-sex relations could land a person in jail for more than a decade Iraq’s parliament on Saturday passed a bill criminalizing same-sex relations, which would receive a sentence of up to 15 years in prison, in a move rights groups condemned as an “attack on human rights.” Transgender people would be sentenced to three years’ jail under the amendments to a 1988 anti-prostitution law, which were adopted during a session attended by 170 of 329 lawmakers. A previous draft had proposed capital punishment for same-sex relations, in what campaigners had called a “dangerous” escalation. The new amendments enable courts to sentence people engaging in same-sex relations to 10 to 15 years in prison, according to the