The Council of Grand Justices on Friday dismissed a request by the Control Yuan for a constitutional interpretation of the legality of the Act Governing the Handling of Ill-gotten Properties by Political Parties and Their Affiliate Organizations (政黨及其附隨組織不當取得財產處理條例).
The council said it was not within the remit of the Control Yuan to request a constitutional interpretation.
The Control Yuan in 2016 received a petition asking it to investigate the legality of the act — through which the Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee was created — and it found that the act and the committee were unconstitutional, with the latter contravening the Basic Code Governing Central Administrative Agencies Organizations (中央行政機關組織基準法).
Photo: Wu Cheng-fong, Taipei Times
The Control Yuan last year filed the request for a constitutional interpretation.
The council gave four reasons for its dismissal of the request.
First, the right to request constitutional interpretations resides with the Judicial Yuan; the Control Yuan does not have the right to do so.
Second, the request was based on the premise that it was normal for the council to process constitutional interpretations filed by the Control Yuan, but this practice was abolished in 1992 after the elections for the second Legislative Yuan, which normalized the constitutional system, so the council no longer has to comply with Control Yuan requests.
Third, the Control Yuan launched its investigation before determining whether the act was unconstitutional, but it is only delegated to impeach, censure and audit.
Fourth, the Control Yuan may request a constitutional interpretation on the condition that laws are potentially unconstitutional; it cannot request interpretations based on its own investigations.
If the procedure the Control Yuan went through to file the request were constitutional, that would mean it had the power to second-guess laws passed by the Legislative Yuan, which would unbalance the five branches of government, the council said.
However, the resolution was not a consensus, with grand justices Tang Te-tsung (湯德宗), Huang Hsi-chun (黃璽君), Lin Chun-yi (林俊益), Chang Chiung-wen (張瓊文) and Wu Chen-huan (吳陳鐶) saying that the request should have been processed, while Huang Horng-hsya (黃虹霞) expressed partial agreement.
Nine justices said that the request should be dismissed.
It was the first time the council has made public the individual stances of the grand justices.
Control Yuan members Chang Kuei-mei (仉桂美) and Liu Te-shun (劉德勳), who filed the request, criticized the dismissal, saying the Judicial Yuan has trampled on the constitutional system and the five branches of government.
“The Control Yuan might as well be abolished,” they said, adding that the council had imposed on itself a “historical burden” and that there would be a heavy price to pay for its decision.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus secretary-general William Tseng (曾銘宗) called the council’s decision “regrettable,” while he questioned the need for the council.
Democratic Progressive Party caucus director-general Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋) said the Legislative Yuan stands by the laws that are passed based on prevalent public opinion.
“If members of the Control Yuan can request constitutional interpretations whenever they are not happy [with a law], the checks and balances of the constitutional system would be thrown into turmoil,” Lee said.
Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee spokeswoman Shih Chin-gang (施錦芳) said the committee respects the council’s decision.
Additional reporting by Chen Yu-fu and Su Fun-her
Beijing could eventually see a full amphibious invasion of Taiwan as the only "prudent" way to bring about unification, the US Department of Defense said in a newly released annual report to Congress. The Pentagon's "Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China 2025," was in many ways similar to last year’s report but reorganized the analysis of the options China has to take over Taiwan. Generally, according to the report, Chinese leaders view the People's Liberation Army's (PLA) capabilities for a Taiwan campaign as improving, but they remain uncertain about its readiness to successfully seize
Taiwan is getting a day off on Christmas for the first time in 25 years. The change comes after opposition parties passed a law earlier this year to add or restore five public holidays, including Constitution Day, which falls on today, Dec. 25. The day marks the 1947 adoption of the constitution of the Republic of China, as the government in Taipei is formally known. Back then the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) governed China from Nanjing. When the KMT, now an opposition party in Taiwan, passed the legislation on holidays, it said that they would help “commemorate the history of national development.” That
Trips for more than 100,000 international and domestic air travelers could be disrupted as China launches a military exercise around Taiwan today, Taiwan’s Civil Aviation Administration (CAA) said yesterday. The exercise could affect nearly 900 flights scheduled to enter the Taipei Flight Information Region (FIR) during the exercise window, it added. A notice issued by the Chinese Civil Aviation Administration showed there would be seven temporary zones around the Taiwan Strait which would be used for live-fire exercises, lasting from 8am to 6pm today. All aircraft are prohibited from entering during exercise, it says. Taipei FIR has 14 international air routes and
The Ministry of National Defense (MND) today released images of the military tracking China’s People's Liberation Army (PLA) movements during the latest round of Chinese drills around Taiwan. The PLA began "Justice Mission 2025" drills today, carrying out live-fire drills, simulated strikes on land and maritime targets, and exercises to blockade the nation's main ports. The exercises are to continue tomorrow, with the PLA announcing sea and air space restrictions for five zones around Taiwan for 10 hours starting from 8:30am. The ministry today released images showing a Chinese J-16 fighter jet tracked by a F-16V Block 20 jet and the