Facing more questions over a cross-strait concert on Sunday that ended early due to a protest that ended in violence, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) yesterday said the Taipei City Government did its duty properly, but cannot avoid criticism from people who have particular political intentions.
“Sing! China: Shanghai-Taipei Music Festival,” promoted by the Taipei and Shanghai municipal governments, began as scheduled at 2pm on Sunday at National Taiwan University’s athletics field, but was abruptly ended at 4pm due to protests.
The demonstrators consisted of students who claimed their right to use the venue was violated for a week and pro-Taiwan independence groups protesting the venue having been renamed “Taipei City Taiwan University” by organizers on posters and tickets, which they said was part of China’s “united front” tactics.
Three students were allegedly injured by a pro-unification group’s members outside the venue as the crowd dispersed.
After a meeting yesterday morning, Ko told reporters that “in regards to standard operating procedures, neither the Taipei Police Department nor the Taipei Department of Cultural Affairs has done anything wrong.”
The cultural department had asked organizers to change “Taipei City Taiwan University” on the posters and tickets, which is just the type of action the department is responsible for, he said.
“If it [the original design circulating on the Internet] is used to discredit us as being pro-China in order to achieve political goals, then we cannot do anything about it,” Ko said. “The public should be smart enough to understand.”
Police respected the principle of university autonomy, he said, but added that in the future, if intelligence indicates the possibility of protests at major events, the police department and the Ministry of Education should develop a communication mechanism.
The festival was created through a memorandum of understanding on cultural exchanges signed with the Shanghai municipal government in 2010, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Taipei City Councilor Wang Shih-chien (王世堅) said on a political talk show, adding that Ko should not shift the blame for the incident, as all 21 concerts organized under the agreement have been held over the past three years, after he became mayor.
In response to Ko’s remark on Monday that Taiwanese “need not be afraid of germs [China’s ‘united front’ tactics] if we have a strong immune system,” DPP Legislator Tuan Yi-kang (段宜康) yesterday in a radio interview called Ko the “biggest germ” and said: “Do parents give their children sewage water and say: ‘You will be all right as long as you have a good immune system?”
Asked whether he felt he was being smeared as being pro-China, Ko said: “The pan-green and pan-blue political ideologies should not interfere with or obstruct the nation’s development. That is wrong.”
“Things should not be exaggerated. It is way out of line to call me a member of the Chinese Community Party,” he added. “Why are they so earnestly smearing me as pro-China now?”
Asked whether he feels the DPP is intentionally discrediting him, Ko said: “Everyone knows very well in their hearts, so I am not going to debate it today.”
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods