The Mainland Affairs Council urged China to face the reality that both sides of the Taiwan Strait have been under separate rule for the past 67 years.
The council was responding to remarks made by Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (李克強), who on Thursday said that both sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to “one China,” adding that it is a fact that cannot be changed.
Li and former vice president Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) met on the sidelines of the Boao Forum for Asia in China’s Hainan Province, with Li saying that cross-strait relations would not change because a party that is known for its pro-Taiwanese independence stance is taking over as the nation’s ruling party.
Li said that China plans to continue peaceful development of bilateral ties based on the “political foundation of the [so-called] 1992 consensus.”
The council said that the “1992 consensus,” which has served as the basis for institutionalized negotiations and exchanges between the two sides over the past eight years, highlights the sovereignty of the Republic of China (ROC).
Li said the fruitful results from years of peaceful development of cross-strait ties were ample proof that maintaining the foundations of the “1992 consensus” would be a good way to create a bright future for both sides.
Not only can such a foundation maintain peace across the Strait, but it can also create benefits for people on both sides, he told Siew.
“The government has been insisting on defining cross-strait relations in accordance with the ROC Constitution,” the council said, urging China to respect and understand the opinion and feelings of Taiwanese.
Saying that “maintaining benevolent cross-strait interactions is the common responsibility of both sides,” the council said that Taiwan and China should have the wisdom to show good will to each other and engage in practical cooperation to create long-lasting peace and stability across the Strait.
The “1992 consensus” refers to a supposed understanding reached during cross-strait talks in 1992 that both Taiwan and China acknowledge that there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
Former KMT lawmaker Su Chi (蘇起) in 2006 admitted he made up the term in 2000, when he was head of the council, before the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) handed power to the Democratic Progressive Party.
The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of
Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday expressed “grave concerns” after Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) reiterated the city-state’s opposition to “Taiwanese independence” during a meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強). In Singapore on Saturday, Wong and Li discussed cross-strait developments, the Singaporean Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. “Prime Minister Wong reiterated that Singapore has a clear and consistent ‘one China’ policy and is opposed to Taiwan independence,” it said. MOFA responded that it is an objective fact and a common understanding shared by many that the Republic of China (ROC) is an independent, sovereign nation, with world-leading
‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to
RSS