Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Karen Yu (余宛如) on Thursday proposed that lawmakers be allowed to bring children under the age of three into the legislative chamber, triggering a mixed reaction from her colleagues, as well as government officials.
DPP Legislator Tuan Yi-kang (段宜康) tabled an extemporaneous motion yesterday in response to Yu’s proposal, demanding that the Legislative Yuan set up a daycare center for all parents working in the Legislative Yuan compound, including staff, journalists, lawmakers and their assistants.
Tuan said the Legislative Yuan should develop into a “friendly workplace,” and it should carry out childcare policies that the government has urged private businesses to follow based on the Act of Gender Equality in Employment (性別平等法), and set an example and reduce discrimination.
DPP Legislator Lin Shu-fen (林淑芬) immediately voiced her support for Tuan’s proposal.
Tuan’s motion was a friendly response to Yu, a DPP legislator-at-large who made the amendment proposal that has since stirred debate both in the legislature and on the Internet.
The regulations governing the legislative general assembly chamber states that no one other than chamber staff and government officials and their assistants are allowed into the general assembly chamber. Yu has proposed amending the regulations to exempt lawmakers and officials “with children under three who need care and breastfeeding” from the rule.
Her draft amendment was supported in signature by more than a dozen lawmakers — including Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Ko Chih-en (柯志恩) and New Power Party Legislator Kawlo Iyun Pacidal — and passed the first reading yesterday.
Yu made her first appearance in the Legislative Yuan on Feb. 1, when the first session of the new legislature convened, with her six-month-old child and said it was a pity that she could not bring her child into the chamber.
“This proposal is not for myself, as I have my family’s support in childcare, but what is on my mind is a presumption that the reason that there are so many double-income families who are not planning to have children is not only because of financial pressure, but also the conflicting nature between the working environment and childcare,” Yu said.
“Insofar as the Legislative Yuan is a highly symbolic institution, it should, in my opinion, hold an open attitude [to the measure],” Yu added.
Legislative Speaker Su Jia-chyuan (蘇嘉全) said lawmakers’ proposals reflect society’s different perspectives and would be reviewed by the legislative committee.
“Taiwan is a democratic country and surely the issue could be put into discussion. And it would be up to the legislature for a final decision on whether it is okay” to bring children under three into the chamber, Su said, adding that he would remain neutral in the debate.
However, not everyone is supportive of the idea.
Premier Simon Chang (張善政) said it would be “strange” to bring infants or toddlers to the chamber.
“Imagine you have small children crying or [people] breastfeeding when officials and lawmakers are in the middle of a question-and-answer session. It is strange,” he said.
“I think [Yu’s] idea is really about a childcare mechanism [in the Legislative Yuan], which can be done now, rather than bringing them into the general assembly chamber,” Chang added.
Minister of Justice Luo Ying-shay (羅瑩雪) said “unpredictable situations” would happen if small children, who would “cry, make noise and run around,” are allowed in the chamber.
KMT Legislator Jason Hsu (許毓仁) said it would not be appropriate for small children to be carried into the general assembly chamber, as “the congress hall is a serious place.”
Facebook community Impolite Netizen Group’s organizer yesterday apologized for his “indiscreet remark” made on Thursday upon hearing Yu’s proposal.
He had lambasted Yu for proposing a bill without “necessity” and for the possibility that people would have to watch small children crying in the chamber.
“After a long discussion with a coworker, I suddenly realized that I had made a big mistake by weighing in on the issue on the basis of taxpayers’ money, but this, if passed, would be a good example and have great impact on Taiwanese values in human rights, parents’ rights and women’s rights,” he said.
The first global hotel Keys Selection by the Michelin Guide includes four hotels in Taiwan, Michelin announced yesterday. All four received the “Michelin One Key,” indicating guests are to experience a “very special stay” at any of the locations as the establishments are “a true gem with personality. Service always goes the extra mile, and the hotel provides much more than others in its price range.” Of the four hotels, three are located in Taipei and one in Taichung. In Taipei, the One Key accolades were awarded to the Capella Taipei, Kimpton Da An Taipei and Mandarin Oriental Taipei. Capella Taipei was described by
EVA Airways today confirmed the death of a flight attendant on Saturday upon their return to Taiwan and said an internal investigation has been launched, as criticism mounted over a social media post accusing the airline of failing to offer sufficient employee protections. According to the post, the flight attendant complained of feeling sick on board a flight, but was unable to take sick leave or access medical care. The crew member allegedly did not receive assistance from the chief purser, who failed to heed their requests for medical attention or call an ambulance once the flight landed, the post said. As sick
The Taichung District Court yesterday confirmed its final ruling that the marriage between teenage heir Lai (賴) and a man surnamed Hsia (夏) was legally invalid, preventing Hsia from inheriting Lai’s NT$500 million (US$16.37 million) estate. The court confirmed that Hsia chose not to appeal the civil judgement after the court handed down its ruling in June, making the decision final. In the June ruling, the court said that Lai, 18, and Hsia, 26, showed “no mutual admiration before the marriage” and that their interactions were “distant and unfamiliar.” The judge concluded that the couple lacked the “true intention of
Minister of Economic Affairs Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) yesterday said that private-sector refiners are willing to stop buying Russian naphtha should the EU ask them to, after a group of non-governmental organizations, including the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA), criticized the nation’s continued business with the country. While Taiwan joined the US and its Western allies in putting broad sanctions on Russia after it invaded Ukraine in 2022, it did not explicitly ban imports of naphtha, a major hard-currency earner for Russia. While state-owned firms stopped importing Russian oil in 2023, there is no restriction on private companies to