The Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) caucus yesterday invited the Ministry of Education (MOE) to report on its latest actions over the curriculum guidelines controversy since the resolution made by the legislature’s cross-caucus negotiation on Aug. 4, and afterward derided the report as “a hoax.”
K-12 Education Administration Deputy Director Wang Cheng-hsien (王承先), the only ministry official to attend the press conference and present the ministry’s report, reiterated that the adjustment process was “constitutional, legal and in accordance with due procedures.”
Saying that the controversy arose due to different groups of people’s “different viewpoints about parts of history, contexts of [historical] incidents and national identity,” Wang said that the ministry has established certain “practical measures,” pursuant to the legislature’s resolution and the Executive Yuan’s Cabinet decision, to quell the controversy over the curriculum adjustments.
The measures are what have previously been avowed by the Executive Yuan: the simultaneous acknowledgement of both new and old versions of textbooks, that the controversial parts will not be included in the college entrance exams, the convening of a review team on the curriculum guidelines adjustments and the guideline-setting process, and the drafting of legislation on educational neutrality.
Wang said a meeting with the textbook publishers has been scheduled for Monday to determine whether schools would run into problems concerning the signed contracts.
The controversies in history curriculum guidelines that have been recognized by the ministry “will be discussed by experts invited by the education administration, and an appendix encompassing the different historical interpretations to the history textbooks is to be produced for teachers to lead a rational discussion respecting diversity in the classroom,” Wang added.
The ministry has also decided to hold the said review conference on Aug. 28, Wang said.
TSU Legislator Lai Chen-chang (賴振昌) said the report did not accomplish what the ministry was asked to do, as the legislative resolution demanded that the ministry “immediately launch” the review process and allow the schools to freely “re-choose” textbooks, but the ministry referred to an official document issued in June as the basis for granting schools the right to freely choose their textbooks.
“Where is your official decree after the legislature made the resolution that schools’ rights to freely choose the textbooks should be guaranteed? You are well aware that bureaucrats need official sanction to support their actions. And what will the ministry do to compensate their losses if they changed to other textbooks?” TSU Legislator Chou Ni-an (周倪安) asked.
“Aug. 17 is simply too late. The schools have already finished selecting their textbooks by then. Likewise, the students will be starting their new semester by Aug. 28, the day you said that the adjustment review meeting will be taking place,” Chou said, calling the ministry’s measures a “hoax.”
Chang Wen-long (張文隆), a high-school history teacher invited by the TSU, said the ministry’s remarks about differing historical perspectives “obscure the point,” as it is the adjustment committee members’ “serious lack of expertise” on history that made the content intolerable.
Frustrated by the ministry’s actions, Chang, a member of one of the anti-curriculum change groups, pronounced that they would be taking “big actions” on Monday.
Tseng Hsin-chuan (曾新泉), an anti-curriculum change high-school student, said the groups continue to call for Minister of Education Wu Se-hwa’s (吳思華) resignation and the retraction of the new curriculum.
Lai said the ministry failed to respect the legislature’s resolution, and the minister’s absence at yesterday’s conference held by the TSU caucus — while attending the Chinese Nationalist Party’s Central Standing Committee meeting on Wednesday — showed contempt of the legislature.
Meanwhile, the ministry on Thursday night said that the names of the committee members who participated in the “minor adjustments” of the curriculum guidelines would not be made public because a majority of them voted against doing so.
Lai accused the ministry of passing the buck to the committee, “which is a political tactic used by the minister of education.”
GOOD DIPLOMACY: The KMT has maintained close contact with representative offices in Taiwan and had extended an invitation to Russia as well, the KMT said The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) would “appropriately handle” the fallout from an invitation it had extended to Russia’s representative to Taipei to attend its international banquet last month, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said yesterday. US and EU representatives in Taiwan boycotted the event, and only later agreed to attend after the KMT rescinded its invitation to the Russian representative. The KMT has maintained long-term close contact with all representative offices and embassies in Taiwan, and had extended the invitation as a practice of good diplomacy, Chu said. “Some EU countries have expressed their opinions of Russia, and the KMT respects that,” he
CHANGES: After-school tutoring periods, extracurricular activities during vacations or after-school study periods must not be used to teach new material, the ministry said The Ministry of Education yesterday announced new rules that would ban giving tests to most elementary and junior-high school students during morning study and afternoon rest periods. The amendments to regulations governing public education at elementary schools and junior high schools are to be implemented on Aug. 1. The revised rules stipulate that schools are forbidden to use after-school tutoring periods, extracurricular activities during summer or winter vacation or after-school study periods to teach new course material. In addition, schools would be prohibited from giving tests or exams to students in grades one to eight during morning study and afternoon break periods, the
Advocates of the rights of motorcycle and scooter riders yesterday protested in front of the Ministry of Transportation and Communications in Taipei, making three demands. They were joined by 30 passenger vehicles, which surrounded the ministry to make three demands related to traffic regulations — that motorcycles and scooters above 250cc be allowed on highways, that all motorcycles and scooters be allowed on inside lanes, and that driver and rider training programs be reformed. The ministry said that it has no plans to allow motorcycles on national highways for the time being, and said that motorcycles would be allowed on the inner
AMENDMENT: Contact with certain individuals in China, Hong Kong and Macau must be reported, and failure to comply could result in a prison sentence, the proposal stated The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) yesterday voted against a proposed bill by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers that would require elected officials to seek approval before visiting China. DPP Legislator Puma Shen’s (沈伯洋) proposed amendments to the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), stipulate that contact with certain individuals in China, Hong Kong and Macau should be reported, while failure to comply would be punishable by prison sentences of up to three years, alongside a fine of NT$10 million (US$309,041). Fifty-six voted with the TPP in opposition