Liberty Times: Hsinchu High School has the most students who signed a petition against the curriculum changes. Why do the students oppose the Ministry of Education’s plan?
Students: High-school students must study many different materials and it is difficult to persuade everyone to sign the petition against the changes. A group of students in the school are working together and finding all relevant information on the matter and have held workshops for open debates.
We have invited teachers and university professors to the workshops for discussion as well. The main discontent is focused on the procedure used to determine the curriculum and how the changes are not ideal and seek to use education as a tool to force ideologies upon people that are supported by a minority.
Photo: Hung Mei-hsiu, Taipei Times
The school’s attitude toward this matter greatly increased our efforts in persuading so many students to sign the petition. In contrast with other schools, where teachers and parents are telling students to focus on their studies and help increase the number of students who get accepted to top universities, Hsinchu High School officials are allowing students to pass out fliers on the matter at the school gates, as well as allowing open debates on the matter.
With more people coming together and understanding the issue, there will be more people signing the petition opposing the changes.
LT: Hsinchu Senior High School has already decided to continue using older versions of the history and civic education textbooks. Are students not afraid that they will be out of touch with materials presented in examinations?
Students: From what we understand, the teachers hope that the textbooks would refrain from slanted historical views, but the ministry’s recent official notice demanding that schools use the new textbooks has put pressure on the school’s administrators.
However, civic education teachers had already decided to use the older textbooks, and the history teachers made the same decision. They are waiting for the ministry to officially repeal its former notice under public pressure before making their choices official.
As for the examinations, according to our research, examinations usually avoid controversial content, as it would only cause more problems that the College Entrance Examination Center would want to avoid.
Primarily, students are opposing political forces intervening in their education. The prime target of our opposition is the Ministry of Education, which we feel should adhere to established procedures for deciding curricula.
LT: Participants in the meeting that passed the controversial changes said that textbooks were meant to serve political goals, adding that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) also amended the curriculum when it was in power from 2000 to 2008. Why are high-school students so strongly opposing the changes made now?
Students: Prior to the lifting of Martial Law, all senior-high schools had only one version of textbooks — the one compiled and published by the National Institute for Compilation and Translation — which is evidently an educational tool used by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
Following the permits issued to private companies to publish textbooks, the first curriculum was devised in 1999, with a temporary curriculum adopted by the DPP in 2006, followed by their proposal for a new curriculum in 2009.
Since the KMT returned to power, it threw out the DPP’s 2009 proposal and instead nominated its own 2012 curriculum, which is the controversial “minor adjustments” to high-school curricula that — despite its controversy — the ministry is adamant about implementing by August.
I made some effort to understand the processes in each of the aforementioned periods and found that the changes made under the DPP government were comparatively law-abiding, allowing for teachers to comment on the changes, while sending the proposals through an assembled curriculum committee, the Committee of Curriculum Development and the Committee of Curriculum Review.
Academics participating in the meetings at the time were all authorities in their respective fields and made the changes keeping the students in mind. The public hearings were also more structured.
However, this time, the curriculum changes have often been called a “black-box” operation that was manipulated by a minority of academics who had no expertise in the subjects being modified. Most of the teachers who conduct the teaching have been removed from the process, with some complaining of receiving the notice to attend the public hearings after the hearings have concluded.
Even students in their minors know that political intervention [in education] is wrong, and that is why we oppose these changes.
Translated by Jake Chung, staff writer
Taipei has once again made it to the top 100 in Oxford Economics’ Global Cities Index 2025 report, moving up five places from last year to 60. The annual index, which was published last month, evaluated 1,000 of the most populated metropolises based on five indices — economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance. New York maintained its top spot this year, placing first in the economics index thanks to the strength of its vibrant financial industry and economic stability. Taipei ranked 263rd in economics, 44th in human capital, 15th in quality of life, 284th for environment and 75th in governance,
Greenpeace yesterday said that it is to appeal a decision last month by the Taipei High Administrative Court to dismiss its 2021 lawsuit against the Ministry of Economic Affairs over “loose” regulations governing major corporate electricity consumers. The climate-related lawsuit — the first of its kind in Taiwan — sought to require the government to enforce higher green energy thresholds on major corporations to reduce emissions in light of climate change and an uptick in extreme weather. The suit, filed by Greenpeace East Asia, the Environmental Jurists Association and four individual plaintiffs, was dismissed on May 8 following four years of litigation. The
A former officer in China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who witnessed the aftermath of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre has warned that Taiwan could face a similar fate if China attempts to unify the country by force. Li Xiaoming (李曉明), who was deployed to Beijing as a junior officer during the crackdown, said Taiwanese people should study the massacre carefully, because it offers a glimpse of what Beijing is willing to do to suppress dissent. “What happened in Tiananmen Square could happen in Taiwan too,” Li told CNA in a May 22 interview, ahead of the massacre’s 36th anniversary. “If Taiwanese students or
The New Taipei City Government would assist relatives of those killed or injured in last month’s car-ramming incident in Sansia District (三峽) to secure compensation, Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said yesterday, two days after the driver died in a hospital. “The city government will do its best to help the relatives of the car crash incident seek compensation,” Hou said. The mayor also said that the city’s Legal Affairs, Education and Social Welfare departments have established a joint mechanism to “provide coordinated assistance” to victims and their families. Three people were killed and 12 injured when a car plowed into schoolchildren and their
RSS