The legality of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu’s (朱立倫) scheduled meeting with Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) General Secretary Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing on May 4 has been called into question, as his status as New Taipei City mayor means such a visit is subject to certain legal restrictions.
According to the National Immigration Agency, the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) stipulates that if the mayor of a municipality plans to visit China, the visit must be applied for in advance.
Under the Regulations Governing Public Servants and Special Status Personnel from the Taiwan Area Entering the Mainland Area (臺灣地區公務員及特定身分人員進入大陸地區許可辦法), the mayor of a municipality is only allowed to enter China when the visit is related to their official duties, or is a visit to a relative.
The agency is set to make a final decision on Wednesday over whether it is legitimate for Chu to conduct “cross-strait exchanges” in China, given that he is both the KMT chairman and New Taipei City mayor.
“The so-called Chu-Xi meeting is supposed to fall under Article 33-1 of the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area, which governs visits made by organizations to China,” Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋) said.
However, Lee said that based on his understanding, Chu applied for the scheduled meeting in his capacity as New Taipei City mayor, which means the visit would fall under Article 6 of the Regulations Governing Public Servants and Special Status Personnel from the Taiwan Area Entering the Mainland Area.
Article 6 of the regulations stipulates that city mayors or county commissioners may only be allowed to visit China if any of the following four conditions apply: They have a spouse or a relative within four degrees of kinship who has household registration in China; their spouse or relative within four degrees of kinship contracted a disease or passed away in China less than a year before the visit, or they are in a critical condition that makes a personal visit necessary; their visit is to conduct exchange events or meetings related to their official duties; they are chosen by or receive consent from their supervising agency to attend a specific event or meeting.
“Since none of the four conditions apply to the pending Chu-Xi meeting, the visit should naturally be denied, unless Chu is to carry out city-to-city exchanges during the visit,” Lee said.
According to sources familiar with the matter, who requested anonymity, the application for Chu’s visit has been filed by the New Taipei City Government as a “confidential document” with the Ministry of the Interior and there is no mention of the scheduled meeting between Chu annd Xi in Chu’s itinerary or the reasons given for the visit.
Relevant government officials have also been tight-lipped in what capacity Chu would visit China, the sources said.
The sources said that municipality mayors, city mayors and county commissioners usually cited job-related reasons, such as marketing for agricultural products, tourism or city-to-city exchanges, and they all made their visits in their capacity as mayor or commissioner.
In response, KMT spokesman Yang Wei-chung (楊偉中) downplayed the matter by saying that the application for the visit has been filed and examined in accordance with the law.
Taipei has once again made it to the top 100 in Oxford Economics’ Global Cities Index 2025 report, moving up five places from last year to 60. The annual index, which was published last month, evaluated 1,000 of the most populated metropolises based on five indices — economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance. New York maintained its top spot this year, placing first in the economics index thanks to the strength of its vibrant financial industry and economic stability. Taipei ranked 263rd in economics, 44th in human capital, 15th in quality of life, 284th for environment and 75th in governance,
Greenpeace yesterday said that it is to appeal a decision last month by the Taipei High Administrative Court to dismiss its 2021 lawsuit against the Ministry of Economic Affairs over “loose” regulations governing major corporate electricity consumers. The climate-related lawsuit — the first of its kind in Taiwan — sought to require the government to enforce higher green energy thresholds on major corporations to reduce emissions in light of climate change and an uptick in extreme weather. The suit, filed by Greenpeace East Asia, the Environmental Jurists Association and four individual plaintiffs, was dismissed on May 8 following four years of litigation. The
A former officer in China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who witnessed the aftermath of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre has warned that Taiwan could face a similar fate if China attempts to unify the country by force. Li Xiaoming (李曉明), who was deployed to Beijing as a junior officer during the crackdown, said Taiwanese people should study the massacre carefully, because it offers a glimpse of what Beijing is willing to do to suppress dissent. “What happened in Tiananmen Square could happen in Taiwan too,” Li told CNA in a May 22 interview, ahead of the massacre’s 36th anniversary. “If Taiwanese students or
The New Taipei City Government would assist relatives of those killed or injured in last month’s car-ramming incident in Sansia District (三峽) to secure compensation, Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said yesterday, two days after the driver died in a hospital. “The city government will do its best to help the relatives of the car crash incident seek compensation,” Hou said. The mayor also said that the city’s Legal Affairs, Education and Social Welfare departments have established a joint mechanism to “provide coordinated assistance” to victims and their families. Three people were killed and 12 injured when a car plowed into schoolchildren and their
RSS