Yesterday marked the first anniversary of the occupation of the Executive Yuan’s main building in Taipei, which took place from the night of March 23 to the early hours of March 24 last year. However, the Executive Yuan museum, inaugurated this year, fails to commemorate the event — the most well-known invasion of an administrative building in Taiwan’s history.
Days after protesters occupied the Legislative Yuan’s main chamber on March 18, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and then-premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) remained unwavering in their refusal to accept the protesters’ call for the retraction of a cross-strait service trade agreement.
Jiang met with the activists on March 22 last year, but gave no indication of a change in the government’s stance.
A group of protesters decided to occupy the Executive Yuan on March 23 in response.
Jiang, in turn, ordered the eviction of the protesters. The six waves of forced removals by riot police proved to be the most severe conflict seen during the Sunflower movement.
The Executive Yuan has insisted on suing the occupiers, even after Jiang’s resignation following the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) defeat in the nine-in-one elections in November last year.
The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office last month indicted 93 people on charges tied to the siege of the Executive Yuan.
Still, the incident is not mentioned in the Executive Yuan museum, which purports to exhibit the history of the government body.
In a section relating to former premier Jiang’s Cabinet, only the policy plans of the proposed free economic pilot zones are on display — there is no material related to the Sunflower movement or the occupation of the Executive Yuan.
In the historical material section, Jiang is pictured visiting hospitalized victims of last year’s fatal gas pipeline explosions in Kaohsiung, but there are no images of him meeting protest leaders outside the Legislative Yuan or denouncing the incident at an international news conference.
Executive Yuan deputy secretary-general Sung Yu-hsieh (宋餘俠) said that the museum was constrained by a lack of available space, and that materials would probably be updated in the future.
As to whether the occupation had earned a place in the Executive Yuan’s history, Sung said that as every government body has a book recording its major events, “[The occupation] records certainly are there.”
National Chengchi University Graduate Institute of Taiwan History director Hsueh Hua-yuan (薛化元) said that the occupation of the Executive Yuan is a major event of historical significance, regardless of how one feels about it, and thereby should be duly recorded.
The Executive Yuan’s history should be centered on the body itself instead of the premiers, Hsueh added, and the occupation should be placed in the museum’s “Time Corridor” section.
Academia Sinica modern history researcher Chen Yi-shen (陳儀深) said that it is to be expected that the objects of the Sunflower movement’s protests would not hold positive views about the occupation, but history per se should reflect what actually happened.
The omission should be interpreted as a lack of confidence, Chen said.
Only when the Executive Yuan is willing to lay out the facts could it make the needed improvements, Chen added, who also suggested the Academia Historica work on a history of the nation’s student movements, that would encompass the Wild Lily student movement in 1990, the Wild Strawberry movement in 2008 and the Sunflower movement.
Academia Historica Edit and Compilation Section head Chang Shih-ying (張世瑛) said the institution had been collecting material during the Sunflower movement.
The institution has worked on post-war democratic activism, social and women’s rights and environmental movements, and an account of the student movement was under consideration, Chang said.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods