The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) yesterday said that responsibility for maintaining peace and stability in cross-strait relations rest with both sides in response to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) recent remarks that rejection of the “common political basis” would bring about volatility and instability in relations.
At a panel discussion with members of the 12th National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference in Beijing on Wednesday, Xi spoke of the importance of adherence to what he called cross-strait “common political basis” — the “1992 consensus” — while urging vigilance against Taiwan independence.
Xi’s comments on the “1992 consensus” were mere repetition, but they cast doubt on the President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration’s claim that the formula allows for Taiwan’s interpretation of “one China” being the Republic of China (ROC) and were interpreted by academics in China and the US as a statement targeted at the DPP, whose return to power in the presidential election in January next year is on the cards.
Asked by the Taipei Times yesterday, the Presidential Office and the Mainland Affairs Council both declined to comment on Xi terming China’s assertion that “the mainland and Taiwan belong to the same one China” as the “core element” of the “1992 consensus,” while making no mention of “respective interpretation” of what the “one China” is — the part of the formula repeatedly emphasized by the Ma administration.
The “1992 consensus” has played an “irreplaceable” role in establishing mutual trust, opening dialogue and negotiations, and improving cross-strait relations, Xi said, adding that the trust would no longer exist and that relations would regress back to the past when they were volatile and unstable, should the common political basis be challenged.
“We have unswervingly insisted that adherence to the ‘1992 consensus’ is the basis of and a prerequisite to our interaction with Taiwan authority and every political party,” Xi said. “Any political party or group in Taiwan will be able to engage with China without hindrance as long as [they adhere to the 1992 consensus].”
DPP Department of Chinese Affairs Director Chao Tien-lin (趙天麟) yesterday was questioned by reporters over whether the party recognizes the “1992 consensus” and whether it has alternatives to the “1992 consensus” palatable to China.
Chao said that the party would stick to the ground rules, titled “three benefits and three demands,” which the party has recently announced, to pursue cross-strait relations “beneficial to the nation’s development of freedom and democracy, peace, security, stability in the region and the reciprocity and interests of both sides of the strait.”
In the meantime, the DPP insists on transparency and democracy in government policymaking processes, multi-sided participation and equal opportunities in cross-strait exchange processes, and the result of exchanges contributing to the good of society, Chao said.
Maintaining peace and stability in cross-strait relations requires the expectations of people on both sides of the strait and the international community to be met, Chao said, adding that “the responsibility [to achieve the goal] falls on each side of the strait.”
In response to Xi’s statement on the “1992 consensus,” Presidential Office spokesperson Charles Chen (陳以信) said that under the framework of the ROC Constitution, the government would continue to seek to maintain “status quo” through a policy of “no unification, no independence and no use of force” in the Taiwan Strait and look to the “1992 consensus, one China with each side having its own interpretation” to serve as the basis from which to promote the development of peaceful cross-strait relations.
Meanwhile, in receiving visitors from the Hoover Institute at Stanford University yesterday morning, Ma said his cross-strait policy based on the ideas Chen stated not only stabilized cross-strait relations, but also consolidated Taiwan-US relations.
Taiwan has received more than US$70 million in royalties as of the end of last year from developing the F-16V jet as countries worldwide purchase or upgrade to this popular model, government and military officials said on Saturday. Taiwan funded the development of the F-16V jet and ended up the sole investor as other countries withdrew from the program. Now the F-16V is increasingly popular and countries must pay Taiwan a percentage in royalties when they purchase new F-16V aircraft or upgrade older F-16 models. The next five years are expected to be the peak for these royalties, with Taiwan potentially earning
STAY IN YOUR LANE: As the US and Israel attack Iran, the ministry has warned China not to overstep by including Taiwanese citizens in its evacuation orders The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday rebuked a statement by China’s embassy in Israel that it would evacuate Taiwanese holders of Chinese travel documents from Israel amid the latter’s escalating conflict with Iran. Tensions have risen across the Middle East in the wake of US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran beginning Saturday. China subsequently issued an evacuation notice for its citizens. In a news release, the Chinese embassy in Israel said holders of “Taiwan compatriot permits (台胞證)” issued to Taiwanese nationals by Chinese authorities for travel to China — could register for evacuation to Egypt. In Taipei, the ministry yesterday said Taiwan
Taiwan is awaiting official notification from the US regarding the status of the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) after the US Supreme Court ruled US President Donald Trump's global tariffs unconstitutional. Speaking to reporters before a legislative hearing today, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said that Taiwan's negotiation team remains focused on ensuring that the bilateral trade deal remains intact despite the legal challenge to Trump's tariff policy. "The US has pledged to notify its trade partners once the subsequent administrative and legal processes are finalized, and that certainly includes Taiwan," Cho said when asked about opposition parties’ doubts that the ART was
If China chose to invade Taiwan tomorrow, it would only have to sever three undersea fiber-optic cable clusters to cause a data blackout, Jason Hsu (許毓仁), a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator, told a US security panel yesterday. In a Taiwan contingency, cable disruption would be one of the earliest preinvasion actions and the signal that escalation had begun, he said, adding that Taiwan’s current cable repair capabilities are insufficient. The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC) yesterday held a hearing on US-China Competition Under the Sea, with Hsu speaking on