The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) denied a media report yesterday that its chairperson has been invited by the US government for a visit, calling it “groundless."
Citing anonymous sources, the Chinese-language China Times reported that the US invited DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) to visit after she took over as head of the party in late May to discuss the direction of the DPP’s China policy, but that Tsai was unwilling to “accept the invitation.”
The China Times said that following the student-led Sunflower movement against a cross-strait trade pact earlier this year, the DPP has again advocated a Taiwanese independence platform, and that Tsai was reluctant to visit over fears of a backlash from the US.
The DPP said in a statement yesterday that the media report was not true, denying that the US government had invited Tsai after she became DPP chairperson.
The report’s claims that Tsai was “unwilling” to go and that she “has not responded positively” are groundless, the DPP statement said.
The DPP said some individuals did invite Tsai to the US and the party did follow up, but because July and August are vacation months in the US, the other side felt that a visit during the summer was inappropriate.
After this month, Tsai would be in full campaign mode to back DPP candidates in the nation’s Nov. 29 elections, which is why no substantive conclusion has been reached on the timing of a visit, although the DPP aims to remain in contact with the individuals, the party’s statement said.
The DPP attaches great importance to exchanges with the US, and communications with it have been friendly and smooth, the statement added, saying the party regretted the misleading reports by the China Times.
Though the China Times cited unnamed sources for its report, it also quoted former DPP legislator Julian Kuo (郭正亮) as saying that the US could not agree with the DPP’s leaning toward Taiwanese independence advocates after the student protests in March.
The US Department of State invited Tsai for a visit after Tsai took over the party’s helm, but she was wavering and dared not accept the invitation, Kuo reportedly said.
Kuo said Tsai’s advocacy of a “Taiwan consensus” in her presidential campaign in 2012 was seen as empty by US officials, leading them to conclude that it was too vague to be an alternative to the so-called “1992 consensus.”
The “1992 consensus” refers to what the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) describes as a tacit understanding reached between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait that “there is only one China with each side free to interpret what that means.”
The DPP says the “1992 consensus” does not exist.
Kuo reportedly told the China Times that Tsai has been unable to come up with a substantive cross-strait program after losing the 2012 election and her party has now fallen prey to Taiwan independence forces, with momentum to block cross-strait trade development getting stronger.
Taipei has once again made it to the top 100 in Oxford Economics’ Global Cities Index 2025 report, moving up five places from last year to 60. The annual index, which was published last month, evaluated 1,000 of the most populated metropolises based on five indices — economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance. New York maintained its top spot this year, placing first in the economics index thanks to the strength of its vibrant financial industry and economic stability. Taipei ranked 263rd in economics, 44th in human capital, 15th in quality of life, 284th for environment and 75th in governance,
Greenpeace yesterday said that it is to appeal a decision last month by the Taipei High Administrative Court to dismiss its 2021 lawsuit against the Ministry of Economic Affairs over “loose” regulations governing major corporate electricity consumers. The climate-related lawsuit — the first of its kind in Taiwan — sought to require the government to enforce higher green energy thresholds on major corporations to reduce emissions in light of climate change and an uptick in extreme weather. The suit, filed by Greenpeace East Asia, the Environmental Jurists Association and four individual plaintiffs, was dismissed on May 8 following four years of litigation. The
A former officer in China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who witnessed the aftermath of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre has warned that Taiwan could face a similar fate if China attempts to unify the country by force. Li Xiaoming (李曉明), who was deployed to Beijing as a junior officer during the crackdown, said Taiwanese people should study the massacre carefully, because it offers a glimpse of what Beijing is willing to do to suppress dissent. “What happened in Tiananmen Square could happen in Taiwan too,” Li told CNA in a May 22 interview, ahead of the massacre’s 36th anniversary. “If Taiwanese students or
The New Taipei City Government would assist relatives of those killed or injured in last month’s car-ramming incident in Sansia District (三峽) to secure compensation, Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said yesterday, two days after the driver died in a hospital. “The city government will do its best to help the relatives of the car crash incident seek compensation,” Hou said. The mayor also said that the city’s Legal Affairs, Education and Social Welfare departments have established a joint mechanism to “provide coordinated assistance” to victims and their families. Three people were killed and 12 injured when a car plowed into schoolchildren and their