National Taiwan University student Hung Chung-yen (洪崇晏) yesterday denied being the “mastermind” behind the demonstration outside the Zhongzheng First Police Precinct station on Friday, but showed his support for the cause by attending an event yesterday outside the Legislative Yuan in Taipei organized by groups seconding the Alliance of Referendum for Taiwan’s petition to make the plaza in front of the legislature a place where people can congregate.
The demonstration outside Taipei’s Zhongzheng First Police Precinct office was triggered by police’s forced eviction of protesters from the plaza — which the alliance had occupied since day one of the students’ seizure of the Legislative Yuan’s chamber — and its subsequent announcement that it had permanently revoked all assembly and parade permits for the group.
Hung yesterday said that he — like the other protesters — went to Friday’s event in response to a call circulating on the Internet earlier that day urging the public to “pass by” the police station.
Photo: Liu Hsin-de, Taipei Times
“If there was a mastermind of the protest, it would be President Ma [Ying-jeou’s, 馬英九] administration and those executive agencies who turned a blind eye to the public’s calls and expressions of dissent,” he said.
“I will not try to avoid any criminal charges I might be accused of for ‘violating’ the unconstitutional Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法). I want to show the ridiculousness of this ‘bad law,’” Hung added.
The clause of the act regarding the need to obtain authorities’ approval before staging a protest was ruled unconstitutional by the Council of Grand Justices earlier this year.
At yesterday’s rally, Anti-Nuclear Action Alliance convener Kao Cheng-yan (高成炎) criticized the legislature for failing to hold a scheduled floor meeting yesterday, making it impossible for it to receive the plaza petition.
“What was the point of chasing the students away from the occupied chamber so desperately then?” he asked.
Calling on the legislature to return the plaza to the people, he said that the Legislative Yuan’s front gate did not exist when the 520 Peasant movement broke out in 1988.
“In addition, I petitioned several times for the anti-nuclear cause in the 1990s on the front plaza without applying for a permit,” Kao said, adding that in 1999, the space was also used by hunger-strikers demanding the passage of a referendum act.
Taiwan Environmental Protection Union secretary-general Andy Tung (董建宏) said the space in front of the legislature’s building should be used to enable public participation, instead of muting people’s voices.
Hung also underlined the need for the public to keep demanding that the government probe the forced dispersion of alliance protesters.
“This case should not simply end with the police reinstating the alliance’s right to assembly,” he said, adding that someone has to be held accountable for the erroneous decision.
Rebuffing accusations that he harbors a grudge against the police, Hung said that he has supported the establishment of a police labor union since last year, when he took to the streets with officers’ families to call for better treatment of law enforcement personnel.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods