Wed, Mar 12, 2014 - Page 3 News List

Lawmakers get ready to tackle thorny trade pact

CONVENER:The DPP and the KMT are fighting each other’s right to have a party member chair a joint committee that will review the cross-strait agreement

By Chris Wang  /  Staff reporter

Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chen Chi-mai, center, talks about the cross-strait service trade agreement during a press conference in Taipei yesterday.

Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times

Lawmakers are gearing up for battle today at the Legislative Yuan over who should preside over a joint committee meeting to screen the controversial cross-strait service trade agreement and whether the pact should be reviewed line-by-line, as stated in a previous consensus.

The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) have been arguing over who should serve as the convener of the meeting, which includes all eight legislative committees. The convener, who will also serve as chairman, is expected to gain the upper hand in dictating the meeting’s procedure.

Based on a previous interparty consensus, DPP Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) should be the designated convener because he was the convener of the last public hearing on Monday, the DPP argues.

However, the KMT caucus says that it should be given the convener’s seat because it was the party that initiated the motion last year for a review of the agreement.

To prevent a potential KMT “ambush,” the DPP, which says it does not oppose the pact, but wants the agreement renegotiated, sent several lawmakers, including Chen, to occupy the meeting room yesterday evening.

According to a consensus reached during interparty negotiations in June last year, the legislature is to review the pact clause-by-clause after the conclusion of 20 public hearings to solicit opinions from various sectors of industry about the agreement’s potential impact.

However, the KMT has said that it could declare the pact effective immediately on the basis of Article 61 of the Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Powers (立法院職權行使法), which states that any executive order that fails to complete a committee review within three months of the plenary session assigning it to the committee shall be deemed passed and effective immediately.

KMT whip Lin Hung-chih (林鴻池) accused Chen of usurping his post as convener, adding that the DPP tried to take over the meeting so that the agreement would not pass.

Speaking at a press conference yesterday morning, Chen pledged that he would preside over the meeting fairly and professionally.

He added that the proposed service trade pact is a quasi-agreement between two countries and should be reviewed by the Legislative Yuan as most democratic countries do with their free-trade agreements.

“The Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration wants the keep the DPP on the sidelines [of the joint meeting] because of its insistence that not one single clause of the pact should be altered,” he said.

Chen added that Article 61 does not apply to the service trade agreement because it is not an executive order.

Chen’s office released a survey of 185 academics, union representatives and non-governmental organization representatives who attended at least one of the 20 public hearings, and said the results showed widespread public suspicion about the trade agreement.

According to the survey, 56.2 percent of respondents said the negotiation process for the agreement was “opaque,” 45.4 percent did not support signing the agreement and 60.5 percent supported a clause-by-clause review.

The respondents were mainly concerned about three potential impacts of the agreement: an influx of Chinese workers (42.1 percent), effect on Taiwan’s small and medium enterprises (53.5 percent) and an acceleration of the outflow of talent to China (55.1 percent), said Chiang Chao-kuo (江肇國), director of Chen’s office.

This story has been viewed 2588 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top