The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday accused the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) of playing a trick on it after the ruling party was caught by surprise when it found that a DPP legislator has set the first committee review of the cross-strait service trade agreement for this week.
“Given that we have acquiesced to the opposition parties’ demands that the agreement be subjected to a line-by-line review and subsequently voted on article by article, the DPP should not have played this trick on us,” KMT caucus whip Lin Hung-chih (林鴻池) said yesterday.
DPP Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁), one of the two conveners of the legislature’s Internal Administration Committee, on Friday scheduled a review of the agreement to take place on Wednesday and Thursday.
According to legislative precedent, the committee’s other convener, KMT Legislator Chang Ching-chung (張慶忠), should take charge of the pact’s review because it was the KMT which advocated the agreement, not the DPP, Lin said.
The caucus whip said he could not predict how the DPP would handle the review process during the committee stage, but that he knew the KMT faces an uphill battle in pushing through the service trade agreement if its political archrival has control over the proceedings.
The ruling party has summoned all of its lawmakers to a caucus meeting tomorrow to hash out response strategies for all possible outcomes of the review, Lin said.
Chen yesterday vowed that he would take a neutral stance and would not seek to dominate the proceedings.
“The cross-strait trade agreement has not been placed on the committee’s agenda before. The committee’s convener is mandated to handle any item that has not been taken care of by the other convener,” Chen said.
Chang said that what the DPP really wanted was to kill the agreement and that it had no intention of helping its ratification.
If the DPP insists on controlling the pact’s review during the committee phase, the KMT should argue that the agreement be allowed to pass the committee stage automatically because the review is in violation of regulations stipulating that it be completed within three months after the plenary session assigns it to the committee, Chang said.
Former minister of economic affairs Yiin Chii-ming (尹啟銘) had previously made the argument based on Article 61 of the Act Governing the legislative Yuan’s Powers (立法院職權行使法).
If ratified by the legislature, the cross-strait trade pact would open up 64 of the nation’s service sub-sectors to Chinese investment, including printing, tourism, restaurants, packaging, delivery service, car rentals, advertisement and the hair styling and beauty industry.
This compares with the 80 service sectors that China will open up to Taiwanese investment.
Since Taipei and Beijing signed the agreement in June last year, numerous public officials and members of the public have raised concerns about what they call the opaque process of its signing and criticized the government for failing to consult with the public before inking the pact.
In response to these concerns, the KMT in December last year agreed to hold a series of 16 public hearings before the line-by-line review of the agreement begins.
The last of these hearings is scheduled to be held tomorrow.
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all