The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) yesterday responded to criticism from party members and across the Taiwan Strait about its “lame” China policy review, insisting that the review was a responsible move and an ongoing effort, and that the party’s core values and position could stand the test of time.
The provisional review, which was announced on Thursday, made no significant recommendations. It said that the spirit of the party’s 1999 resolution on the nation’s future remained unchanged, but that it would be flexible in the way it engages with China.
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) told a news conference in Beijing yesterday that the DPP “still stubbornly insisted on its Taiwan independence ideology based on ‘one country on each side’ ... and incited hostility and confrontation with its so-called core values.”
Photo: Liu Hsin-de, Taipei Times
TAO Director Zhang Zhijun (張志軍) was also quoted as saying that the DPP would “have a hard time finding an opening [of the bilateral engagement] if it could not keep up with the times and public opinion and if it failed to be open-minded.”
Beijing’s response “was not helpful to the DPP’s effort in improving bilateral relations,” DPP spokesperson Xavier Chang (張惇涵) said yesterday, adding that the DPP’s basic position toward China has been accepted by the majority of Taiwanese and could stand the test of time.
“We stand firm on the values that should be upheld, but will be more flexible in our policies,” he said.
The most notable development on Thursday was the replacement of the “constitutionalism consensus” — the provisional conclusion that previously served as the DPP’s foundation for cross-strait engagements — with “actively seeking public consensus in Taiwan,” which was proposed by former DPP chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文).
Tsai said on Facebook yesterday that her initiative of the “Taiwan consensus,” which proposed to seek maximum consensus in Taiwan before dealing with China, would help the DPP formulate a set of distinctive China policies that could better those of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and safeguard the nation’s sovereignty.
“The initiative of ‘Taiwan is the Republic of China (ROC) and the ROC is Taiwan’ that I proposed during the presidential campaign in 2012 has been, by far, accepted by the majority of Taiwanese. With that as the foundation, we could eventually find the maximum consensus, which is what I called the Taiwan consensus,” Tsai wrote.
Former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) yesterday expressed disappointment that his proposal of “Two sides, two constitutions (憲法各表)” was not adopted and included in the review, saying that the DPP “still tried to bypass the issue of the ROC and its Constitution” in its discussions.
Hsieh’s proposal was based on the idea that the ROC and the People’s Republic of China’s constitutions are both legitimate and the two sides share a special relationship, but govern separately.
The former premier said the DPP’s China policy remained ambiguous and unclear and “perhaps that was why support for the DPP’s China policy still lagged behind support for the KMT’s — 27 percent to 35 percent — despite the KMT’s sorry performance.”
Several academics and DPP members described the review as a failure, with former DPP lawmaker Julian Kuo (郭正亮) saying that the removal of the constitutionalism consensus marked a setback for Su, while National Chengchi University professor Tung Cheng-yuan (童振源) was pessimistic about Beijing’s willingness to engage the DPP in the future after the party’s failure to adjust its political position.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), spokeswoman Yang Chih-yu (楊智伃) and Legislator Hsieh Lung-chieh (謝龍介) would be summoned by police for questioning for leading an illegal assembly on Thursday evening last week, Minister of the Interior Liu Shyh-fang (劉世芳) said today. The three KMT officials led an assembly outside the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office, a restricted area where public assembly is not allowed, protesting the questioning of several KMT staff and searches of KMT headquarters and offices in a recall petition forgery case. Chu, Yang and Hsieh are all suspected of contravening the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法) by holding
PRAISE: Japanese visitor Takashi Kubota said the Taiwanese temple architecture images showcased in the AI Art Gallery were the most impressive displays he saw Taiwan does not have an official pavilion at the World Expo in Osaka, Japan, because of its diplomatic predicament, but the government-backed Tech World pavilion is drawing interest with its unique recreations of works by Taiwanese artists. The pavilion features an artificial intelligence (AI)-based art gallery showcasing works of famous Taiwanese artists from the Japanese colonial period using innovative technologies. Among its main simulated displays are Eastern gouache paintings by Chen Chin (陳進), Lin Yu-shan (林玉山) and Kuo Hsueh-hu (郭雪湖), who were the three young Taiwanese painters selected for the East Asian Painting exhibition in 1927. Gouache is a water-based
Taiwan would welcome the return of Honduras as a diplomatic ally if its next president decides to make such a move, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said yesterday. “Of course, we would welcome Honduras if they want to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan after their elections,” Lin said at a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee, when asked to comment on statements made by two of the three Honduran presidential candidates during the presidential campaign in the Central American country. Taiwan is paying close attention to the region as a whole in the wake of a
OFF-TARGET: More than 30,000 participants were expected to take part in the Games next month, but only 6,550 foreign and 19,400 Taiwanese athletes have registered Taipei city councilors yesterday blasted the organizers of next month’s World Masters Games over sudden timetable and venue changes, which they said have caused thousands of participants to back out of the international sporting event, among other organizational issues. They also cited visa delays and political interference by China as reasons many foreign athletes are requesting refunds for the event, to be held from May 17 to 30. Jointly organized by the Taipei and New Taipei City governments, the games have been rocked by numerous controversies since preparations began in 2020. Taipei City Councilor Lin Yen-feng (林延鳳) said yesterday that new measures by
RSS