Heated debate is expected in a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) meeting tomorrow, despite it having been scheduled as an occasion for the party to finalize and unveil its “new and improved” China policy, with DPP members still arguing about the independence clause and the party’s stance on facilitating cross-strait exchanges.
The moderate wing of the party, led by former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷), published articles on various platforms ahead of tomorrow’s meeting — the finale of a series of seminars and expanded meetings held in the past seven months — to criticize the party’s “conservative stance” in the draft report.
The meeting drew even more attention from DPP members and political observers after DPP caucus convener Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) proposed freezing the party’s Taiwan independence clause to reduce tensions between Beijing and the DPP, and to facilitate bilateral dialogue.
Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times
Hsieh, who advocated “two sides, two constitutions (兩岸兩憲)” as the foundation of bilateral engagement, said in an op-ed piece published by the Chinese-language United Daily News yesterday that his initiative had been revised to the “constitutionalism consensus,” which is vastly different from his proposal.
The former premier urged the DPP to “review, integrate and summarize” the three resolutions on Taiwan’s political status — the independence clause written in 1991, the resolution on Taiwan’s future in 1999 and the resolution on a normal country in 2007 — and unify the party’s position on the highly contentuous issue.
Former DPP legislator Julian Kuo (郭正亮) lambasted the draft report, which was sent to DPP politicians for final review, saying that DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang’s (蘇貞昌) China policy “was more conservative and unrealistic than [that of] former DPP chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文).”
Su’s position on China was based on the 1999 resolution on Taiwan’s future, which was a “cliche,” Kuo said, adding that the DPP under Su’s leadership has been “passive” about cross-strait engagement and highlighted political confrontation.
Kuo described as “unfeasible” the DPP’s provisional conclusion of its new China policy that stressed support of human rights, freedom and a democratic movement in China, and advocated a “value-based diplomacy.”
“From what I’ve seen, the DPP still has not found the solution to replace the Chinese Nationalist Party’s [KMT] so-called ‘1992 Consensus,’ which has been accepted by Beijing as the foundation for bilateral exchanges,” Kuo said.
Responding to the criticism, the DPP’s Policy Research Committee executive director Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) said that the draft report was a summary of the consensus of previous meetings and could be revised again, if that was the consensus of those who would attend the meeting.
“We still think that freezing the independence clause is not an issue, because Taiwan is already a sovereign and independent country,” he said, adding that he was unsure if Ker would again propose freezing the clause.
Meanwhile, National Chengchi University professor Tung Cheng-yuan (童振源) and former Straits Exchange Foundation president Hung Chi-chang (洪奇昌) reportedly will announce a three-point initiative on the DPP’s China policy, which would propose freezing the independence clause and passage of a resolution that recognizes the Republic of China (ROC); establishing a non-partisan committee to promote peaceful development across the Taiwan Strait; and endorsing Hsieh’s “two sides, two constitutions” proposal.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), spokeswoman Yang Chih-yu (楊智伃) and Legislator Hsieh Lung-chieh (謝龍介) would be summoned by police for questioning for leading an illegal assembly on Thursday evening last week, Minister of the Interior Liu Shyh-fang (劉世芳) said today. The three KMT officials led an assembly outside the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office, a restricted area where public assembly is not allowed, protesting the questioning of several KMT staff and searches of KMT headquarters and offices in a recall petition forgery case. Chu, Yang and Hsieh are all suspected of contravening the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法) by holding
PRAISE: Japanese visitor Takashi Kubota said the Taiwanese temple architecture images showcased in the AI Art Gallery were the most impressive displays he saw Taiwan does not have an official pavilion at the World Expo in Osaka, Japan, because of its diplomatic predicament, but the government-backed Tech World pavilion is drawing interest with its unique recreations of works by Taiwanese artists. The pavilion features an artificial intelligence (AI)-based art gallery showcasing works of famous Taiwanese artists from the Japanese colonial period using innovative technologies. Among its main simulated displays are Eastern gouache paintings by Chen Chin (陳進), Lin Yu-shan (林玉山) and Kuo Hsueh-hu (郭雪湖), who were the three young Taiwanese painters selected for the East Asian Painting exhibition in 1927. Gouache is a water-based
Taiwan would welcome the return of Honduras as a diplomatic ally if its next president decides to make such a move, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said yesterday. “Of course, we would welcome Honduras if they want to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan after their elections,” Lin said at a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee, when asked to comment on statements made by two of the three Honduran presidential candidates during the presidential campaign in the Central American country. Taiwan is paying close attention to the region as a whole in the wake of a
OFF-TARGET: More than 30,000 participants were expected to take part in the Games next month, but only 6,550 foreign and 19,400 Taiwanese athletes have registered Taipei city councilors yesterday blasted the organizers of next month’s World Masters Games over sudden timetable and venue changes, which they said have caused thousands of participants to back out of the international sporting event, among other organizational issues. They also cited visa delays and political interference by China as reasons many foreign athletes are requesting refunds for the event, to be held from May 17 to 30. Jointly organized by the Taipei and New Taipei City governments, the games have been rocked by numerous controversies since preparations began in 2020. Taipei City Councilor Lin Yen-feng (林延鳳) said yesterday that new measures by