Despite the seemingly peaceful atmosphere across the Taiwan Strait, what appears to the public as President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) further tilting toward China during his second term has aggravated people’s anxieties about China and created a sense of urgency for them to speak against cross-strait unification, local political observers said.
Tung Chen-yuan (童振源), a professor at National Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of Development Studies, said that while China has shown goodwill toward Taiwan since Ma began his second term in May, such as by signing the cross-strait service trade agreement, it has yet to abandon its “fundamental hostility” toward the nation.
“For instance, China has not given up its attempts to suppress Taiwan’s international presence or intimidate the nation with its military superiority, nor has it changed [its ways of] handling cross-strait sovereignty disputes. Several public surveys also show that there is a widespread public perception that China is antagonistic toward Taiwan,” Tung said.
At a time when the majority of Taiwanese are still wary about China, its gestures of goodwill only breed doubts about its motives, Tung said.
“To make matters worse, Ma’s China-leaning stance has become ever more apparent during his second term,” Tung said, citing Ma’s reply to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) congratulatory letter on his re-election as Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman in July and his controversial Double Ten National Day speech last month.
Ma said in the reply that “both sides of the Taiwan Strait reached a consensus in 1992 to express each other’s insistence on the ‘one China’ principle,” abandoning the “different interpretations” (各表) phrase that the Taiwanese government usually used when explaining the consensus.
In his National Day address, Ma defined cross-strait relations as “not international relations,” a statement critics said has weakened the nation’s sovereignty and made cross-strait issues an internal matter.
“These incidents have unnerved many in Taiwan, prompting them to speak up and express their opposition to unification [in opinion polls],” Tung said.
According to the latest survey conducted by cable news channel TVBS on the public’s position on cross-strait relations, as many as 71 percent of respondents preferred independence over unification.
Nearly 68 percent of respondents in a separate opinion poll by the Taiwan Indicators Survey Research (TISR) said they opposed making unification with China a national goal should a cross-strait peace treaty be signed.
TISR general manager Tai Li-an (戴立安) said since the service trade treaty was inked in June, the number of respondents to opinion polls who oppose the pact has consistently outnumbered those who support it.
OVERHAUL NEEDED: The government should improve its agricultural processing capabilities and expand to new markets to limit its reliance on China, an expert said China’s ban on Taiwanese pineapples was “unsurprising,” and Taiwan should have years ago altered its produce export strategies and target customers, experts said. China on Friday abruptly suspended imports of pineapples from Taiwan, saying that it had on multiple occasions discovered “harmful biological entities” on the fruit. Calling it an “unfriendly” move, the Council of Agriculture (COA) said that 99.79 percent of the pineapples sent to China since last year have met China’s import standards. Chiao Chun (焦鈞), the author of Fruits and Politics — A Recollection of Cross-strait Agricultural Interaction Over the Past Decade (水果政治學：兩岸農業交流十年回顧與展望), said that China’s announcement is clearly targeting
The Council of Agriculture yesterday signed a Taiwan-Australia Agricultural Cooperation Implementation clause to open a new export market for the nation’s pineapple crop. The clause is an addition to existing cooperation measures, it said. China on Friday last week abruptly announced that it would suspend pineapple imports from Taiwan starting on Monday, on grounds that it had on multiple occasions discovered “harmful organisms” in shipments of the fruit. The public and private sectors have since joined hands to purchase the local fruit to help the nation’s pineapple farmers. Canberra has requested that all pineapples for export to Australia have their crown buds removed,
DECADES OF INFLUENCE: Over the past 20 years, China has made inroads with Aborigines, funding political campaigns and trips, a legislator said Lawmakers have called on the National Security Bureau to investigate claims of pervasive Chinese influence among Aboriginal communities. Legislators pointed to a surge in communist propaganda and Chinese-funded projects over the past few years, which they say are aimed at infiltrating and buying political influence among Aboriginal communities. “China has for decades carried out wide-ranging ‘united front’ tactics and propaganda campaigns targeting Aborigines,” said Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Ying (陳瑩), a member of the Puyuma community in Taitung County. “Now, they are influencing elections for local councilors and village chiefs, offering money for candidates to mount their campaigns, and to
DISSATISFACTION? If the referendums collect more than 700,000 signatures each, they would have gotten the most signatures in the shortest time, the party said The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) two referendum petitions — one on banning the importation of pork with traces of ractopamine and the other on holding referendums on the same day as national elections — had as of Thursday gathered 691,398 and 674,497 signatures respectively, the party said yesterday. If the petitions collect more than 700,000 signatures apiece, they would have garnered the most signatures in the shortest time since the Referendum Act (公民投票法) was amended in 2017, party officials said. The KMT proposed the “anti-ractopamine pork” or “food safety” referendum just days after President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) announcement on Aug. 28 last