An academic analysis concludes the “pivot” or “rebalance” in US relations with the Asia-Pacific region has generally overlooked Taiwan.
Beginning in 2008, Chinese and US leaders have agreed with President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) reversal of Taipei’s past intense competition with China in favor of policy reassuring Beijing, it says.
The analysis, titled Balancing Acts: The US Rebalance and Asia-Pacific Stability, was published this week by the George Washington University’s Sigur Center for Asian Studies.
In the view of Chinese and US leaders, the past five years of stability and growing exchanges across the Taiwan Strait stand “in favorable contrast” with repeated crises in the previous decade, the analysis says.
“Today, Taiwan remains an exception to the turmoil along China’s eastern rim, in the Korean Peninsula, and the East China Sea and the South China Sea,” it says.
It says that neither Beijing nor Washington nor Taipei sees their interests served by new tensions in cross-strait relations.
“Against this background, the US rebalance has generally avoided explicit reference to Taiwan,” the analysis says.
It quotes Ma as telling US National Security Adviser James Jones in June last year that Taiwan not only welcomed the rebalancing, but also hoped to further strengthen its interaction with the US on the economic, trade, security and cultural fronts.
“But Taiwan has not strongly associated with the rebalance,” the analysis says.
Because Taiwan has the same claims as China to disputed territories in the East China Sea and the South China Sea, it has adopted “sometimes confrontational” policies toward Japan and South China Sea disputants.
These policies “exacerbate tensions and work against US efforts to calm regional tensions,” the analysis says.
The 50-page report was written by four George Washington University faculty members: Robert Sutter, Michael Brown, Mike Mochizuki and Deepa Ollapally, and a student, Timothy Adamson.
“Although commentators in China and some observers elsewhere have suggested that the rebalance was designed to contain China, this is a simplistic reading of the new policy,” the analysis says.
“In geostrategic terms, the rebalance is the [US President Barack] Obama administration’s grand strategy for US foreign policy,” it says.
According to the analysis, the rebalance has more promise for advancing US interests, especially economic interests, than US policy efforts in most other parts of the world. Looking at the prospects for US-China relations, the analysis says that “a happy ending is possible,” but not guaranteed.
The new US policy is based on the need for strategic reassurance in the face of a rising and increasingly assertive China, it says.
“The rebalance is also driven by a desire to reassure US allies, friends, and other countries in the region that the US has not been exhausted after a decade of war, that it has not been weakened by economic and political problems at home and that it is not going to disengage from Asia-Pacific affairs,” it says.
According to the analysis, Obama is himself a “driving force” behind the rebalance. As a result, recent changes in the staff of the US National Security Council will not have “significant impact” on the new policy.
Looking ahead, the analysis says, it remains to be seen if China can sustain a more moderate stance toward US policy.
“China remains deeply skeptical of the rebalance, although Beijing has been somewhat eased by Washington’s attempts to provide reassurances over US intentions and its emphasis on the diplomatic, rather than the military elements of the new policy,” it says.
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
FLU SEASON: Twenty-six severe cases were reported from Tuesday last week to Monday, including a seven-year-old girl diagnosed with influenza-associated encephalopathy Nearly 140,000 people sought medical assistance for diarrhea last week, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) said on Tuesday. From April 7 to Saturday last week, 139,848 people sought medical help for diarrhea-related illness, a 15.7 percent increase from last week’s 120,868 reports, CDC Epidemic Intelligence Center Deputy Director Lee Chia-lin (李佳琳) said. The number of people who reported diarrhea-related illness last week was the fourth highest in the same time period over the past decade, Lee said. Over the past four weeks, 203 mass illness cases had been reported, nearly four times higher than the 54 cases documented in the same period
Heat advisories were in effect for nine administrative regions yesterday afternoon as warm southwesterly winds pushed temperatures above 38°C in parts of southern Taiwan, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) said. As of 3:30pm yesterday, Tainan’s Yujing District (玉井) had recorded the day’s highest temperature of 39.7°C, though the measurement will not be included in Taiwan’s official heat records since Yujing is an automatic rather than manually operated weather station, the CWA said. Highs recorded in other areas were 38.7°C in Kaohsiung’s Neimen District (內門), 38.2°C in Chiayi City and 38.1°C in Pingtung’s Sandimen Township (三地門), CWA data showed. The spell of scorching
A group of Taiwanese-American and Tibetan-American students at Harvard University on Saturday disrupted Chinese Ambassador to the US Xie Feng’s (謝鋒) speech at the school, accusing him of being responsible for numerous human rights violations. Four students — two Taiwanese Americans and two from Tibet — held up banners inside a conference hall where Xie was delivering a speech at the opening ceremony of the Harvard Kennedy School China Conference 2024. In a video clip provided by the Coalition of Students Resisting the CCP (Chinese Communist Party), Taiwanese-American Cosette Wu (吳亭樺) and Tibetan-American Tsering Yangchen are seen holding banners that together read: