Opinions appear to be divided over whether former People First Party (PFP) legislator Lin Cheng-er’s (林正二) conviction for vote-buying in 2007 should apply to his previous term as legislator or include his current term.
The Supreme Court on July 11 upheld the Taiwan High Court’s ruling during a second retrial that Lin was guilty of vote-buying when he instructed his aides to invite all Aboriginal voters to a free dinner during his 2007 campaign for a seat on the Seventh Legislature. Lin was sentenced to 20 months in prison and deprived of his civil rights for one-and-a-half years.
The Supreme Court added that the sentence cannot be suspended.
In accordance with Article 117 of the Public Officials Election and Recall Law (公職人員選舉罷免法), Lin should have had his office or powers suspended during the retrial held in May last year, and every vote he had cast during that time should be declared invalid.
Article 117 states that if an elected official is convicted of vote-buying and the sentence is not suspended, the official should have their office or powers suspended on the date of trial and prior to the final verdict to prevent the defendant from using their power to try to influence the judicial process or drag out the legal battle.
The controversy lies in that Lin was convicted of vote-buying during his campaign for the Seventh Legislature, but he was still able to run for the Eighth Legislature and was re-elected. That gave rise to the question of whether the sentence should only apply to the previous legislative term for which he faced prosecution, or whether it should be expanded to cover his current term in the Eighth Legislature.
Huang Li-hsin (黃麗馨), director of the Ministry of the Interior’s Department of Civil Affairs, said that the ministry does not comment on individual cases. However, he added that criminal conduct should be limited to the term of service for which the charge had been brought to court.
Central Election Commission Vice Chairman Liu Yi-chou (劉義周) said that if a legislator was accused of vote-buying during their term, but the final verdict was only delivered after they had successfully run for another term, the verdict should not be limited to the term in which the charges were brought against the defendant.
However, Liu added that the commission was tasked only with election process and affairs, and the ministry would better explain the specifics.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Wu Yi-chen (吳宜臻) said that if Article 117 was written to prevent elected officials from using their positions to interfere with the judicial process, the outcome of the judicial procedure should not be limited to the term in which they were prosecuted.
There is no clear definition in the said article that states the result of judicial process should be limited to “the particular term of election one held when prosecuted,” Wu said.
If there are doubts about the law, an amendment should be made and the ministry should be tasked with fixing the problem, Wu said.
Other experts on the functions of the legislature said that Article 117 only states that legislators are forbidden from voting during legislative sessions, but are still entitled to their wages, since they have only been suspended from exercising their power, but still retain their position as legislators.
The controversy over the Lin case has also drawn attention to similar cases, such as Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Liao Cheng-ching (廖正井), who had also been accused of vote-buying during his campaign for the Seventh Legislature.
Officials have said that Liao’s powers were not suspended immediately after he was found guilty in 2009 because the courts did not necessarily mail the verdict to the individual’s office or because there was a time lapse in the mailing of the verdict.
Wu said Huang’s comments were only an excuse for administrative inaction.
Lin’s suspension could also cause the PFP caucus in the Legislative Yuan to disband due to a lack of members.
PFP spokesman Thomas Lee (李桐豪) said the issue was still under discussion and that the party would consider forming a political coalition if necessary.
An increase in Taiwanese boats using China-made automatic identification systems (AIS) could confuse coast guards patrolling waters off Taiwan’s southwest coast and become a loophole in the national security system, sources familiar with the matter said yesterday. Taiwan ADIZ, a Facebook page created by enthusiasts who monitor Chinese military activities in airspace and waters off Taiwan’s southwest coast, on Saturday identified what seemed to be a Chinese cargo container ship near Penghu County. The Coast Guard Administration went to the location after receiving the tip and found that it was a Taiwanese yacht, which had a Chinese AIS installed. Similar instances had also
GOOD DIPLOMACY: The KMT has maintained close contact with representative offices in Taiwan and had extended an invitation to Russia as well, the KMT said The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) would “appropriately handle” the fallout from an invitation it had extended to Russia’s representative to Taipei to attend its international banquet last month, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said yesterday. US and EU representatives in Taiwan boycotted the event, and only later agreed to attend after the KMT rescinded its invitation to the Russian representative. The KMT has maintained long-term close contact with all representative offices and embassies in Taiwan, and had extended the invitation as a practice of good diplomacy, Chu said. “Some EU countries have expressed their opinions of Russia, and the KMT respects that,” he
VIGILANCE: The military is paying close attention to actions that might damage peace and stability in the region, the deputy minister of national defense said The People’s Republic of China (PRC) might consider initiating a hack on Taiwanese networks on May 20, the day of the inauguration ceremony of president-elect William Lai (賴清德), sources familiar with cross-strait issues said. While US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken’s statement of the US expectation “that all sides will conduct themselves with restraint and prudence in the period ahead” would prevent military actions by China, Beijing could still try to sabotage Taiwan’s inauguration ceremony, the source said. China might gain access to the video screens outside of the Presidential Office Building and display embarrassing messages from Beijing, such as congratulating Lai
Four China Coast Guard ships briefly sailed through prohibited waters near Kinmen County, Taipei said, urging Beijing to stop actions that endanger navigation safety. The Chinese ships entered waters south of Kinmen, 5km from the Chinese city of Xiamen, at about 3:30pm on Monday, the Coast Guard Administration said in a statement later the same day. The ships “sailed out of our prohibited and restricted waters” about an hour later, the agency said, urging Beijing to immediately stop “behavior that endangers navigation safety.” Ministry of National Defense spokesman Sun Li-fang (孫立方) yesterday told reporters that Taiwan would boost support to the Coast Guard