Mon, Jun 24, 2013 - Page 3 News List

Ma’s ‘one China’ view has left public powerless: poll

SELF-UNDETERMINATION:Of those polled, a majority said the ‘one China’ stance took away their options, with an expert saying it left Taiwanese just one future: unification

By Chris Wang  /  Staff reporter

Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Lin Chia-lung, left, announces the results of a Taiwan Thinktank public opinion poll at a press conference at National Taiwan University yesterday.

Photo: CNA

By supporting the “one China” framework, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has stripped Taiwanese of their options to decide the nation’s future, violating his campaign pledge that the nation’s 23 million people would have the power to do so, according to the majority of respondents in a public opinion poll released yesterday.

The survey, conducted by Taiwan Thinktank, showed that most respondents were displeased with Ma’s recent handling of cross-strait affairs and major domestic policies, including the proposed 12-year education program and the planned national referendum to decide the fate of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in Gongliao District (貢寮), New Taipei City (新北市).

The discontent contributed to Ma’s low 17.4 percent approval rating, the lowest mark since the think tank began conducting its polls in March last year, while his disapproval rating of 73.3 percent also hit a record high, Hsu Yung-ming (徐永明), convener of the think tank’s poll panel, told a news conference.

Comments made by former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) in his recent meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — which highlighted the “one China” framework and the shared ancestry of the countries’ peoples — seems to have caused a backlash among Taiwanese, with 61.6 percent of those polled saying the KMT’s ideology had stripped the people of their options for the future and 71.5 percent of those polled saying it violated Ma’s campaign promise.

“The KMT’s statement basically told Taiwanese that they would have only one option in the future: unification,” said Tung Li-wen (董立文), an associate professor of the Graduate School of Public Security at Central Police University and a Taiwan Thinktank consultant.

Most of the survey’s participants said they are not impressed with how the Ma administration conducted the negotiations with Beijing for the service trade agreement signed on Friday in Shanghai, nor with the proposed establishment of representative offices for the Straits Exchange Foundation in China and for the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits in Taiwan.

Since almost all the key details about the service pact were not disclosed, discussed or reviewed before it was signed, more than half — 58.8 percent — of the respondents said the process was inappropriate and 80.4 percent supported the Legislative Yuan reviewing the pact.

With regards to the representative offices, 77.6 percent of those polled said the issue was not urgent, while 69.7 percent of the respondents said that if they are established, they should be authorized with the same functions as foreign consulates.

The survey found that 79.9 percent of the respondents viewed Taiwan and China as different countries, with only 12.1 percent supporting a “one China” structure and 8 percent declining to answer.

On the issue of independence and unification, 8.8 percent of the poll participants said they were pro-unification in general, with 1.2 percent of them saying they favored immediate unification and 7.6 percent preferring maintaining the “status quo” for the time being and unifying in the future.

By contrast, 20.6 percent supported Taiwan independence, including 6.4 percent who called for immediate independence and 14.2 percent who preferred a more gradual independence process.

This story has been viewed 8043 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top