Liberty Times: How would you evaluate the ongoing government reforms introduced by President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration?
Chu Wu-hsien (朱武獻): The problem with the current reforms is that government remains far too large.
When we started reforming the government in 1987, there were about 20 ministries and committees in the government. When the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won the presidential election of 2004, it planned to shrink the government to a minimum of 22 ministries and committees.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
After some discussion and compromise, it was agreed prior to the DPP’s defeat in the 2008 presidential election that there would be 26 ministries and committees at most.
When the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) came to power there were 29 government ministries and committees.
The ROC Constitution was originally promulgated for the governance of 400 million people, 35 provinces and 12 cities under the jurisdiction of the Executive Yuan [in other words, it was a Constitution designed for China.]
Despite the KMT’s relocation to Taiwan in 1949, the basic structure of government is still based on the ideals of the nation’s founding father, Dr Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙), [which incorporates a National Congress, the five yuans and the Presidential Office].
It is a good thing that the National Assembly has been frozen [following a Constitutional amendment in 2000], but there are still seven yuan-level government agencies, namely the five yuans, the Presidential Office, and the National Security Council (NSC) — the secretaries-general of the Presidential Office and the NSC are on the same pay-grade as the heads of the five yuans.
These are the primary government agencies in charge of policy issues and they have to constantly negotiate with each other, but they all have too many high-level officials nominated by the president.
Take, for example, the treatment our government gives a Control Yuan or Examination Yuan committee member. Not only are they on the same pay grade as ministers, each one has a government vehicle as well as a secretary, an office and an assistant.
In addition, this huge organization also needs a large number of staff, adding to the cost for intra and inter-organization negotiations.
As I constantly tell our civil servants, a civil servant of the Republic of China (ROC) has to be good at negotiating, at least three times better than a Japanese civil servant [because of the large number of people one has to go through].
For example, the Judges Act (法官法), involves members from the Ministry of Civil Service, the Ministry of Examination and the Examination Yuan’s Civil Servants Protection and Training Committee, the Executive Yuan’s Central Personnel Administration (CPA) and the Secretariat and prosecutors under the Ministry of Justice affiliated with the Judicial Yuan.
It took about 10 years for the act to be passed and if it were not for the scandal involving “dinosaur judges,” which caused the public to pressure the government to speed up the process, I do not know how much longer it would have taken.
Meanwhile, there are currently 37 ministries and committees in the second-class government organization ranking. Although the Ma administration plans to shrink that to 29, I am of the opinion that 29 is still too many.
My reason for holding this opinion is because the four committees and ministries under the Examination Yuan are untouched. Add those to Academia Sinica and Academia Historica under the Presidential Office, the National Audit Office under the Control Yuan and the National Security Bureau under the NSC — and even if the Ma administration’s reforms pass, there will still be 30 to 40 ministries and committees in total.
If we compare our government with others around the world, then Taiwan clearly has the most ministry-level government organizations.
According to data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) from 2009, the Canadian government had about 24 ministry-level organizations, New Zealand had 22, Japan had 11 and South Korea had 15, the same number as the US.
OECD data show that China, even with its 1.3 billion population, only had 27 ministry-level organizations in 2008.
Taiwan, on the other hand, has nearly 40 ministry-level organizations with a total population of about 22.5 million.
Despite our relatively small population, our government organizations are large and burdened with high-level officials and president-nominated administrative officials. [For example], the Examination Yuan had 19 examination committee members, the Control Yuan has 29 Control Yuan Committee members and the Executive Yuan has about seven or nine ministers without portfolio.
The [financial] cost of keeping just one presidentially nominated committee member is quite high, [not to mention the number of people who are actually on the payroll].
Liberty Times: Do you have any specific suggestions for the Ma administration?
Chu: When the DPP was in power, the Legislative Yuan asked for the total number of ministry-level agencies to be kept at 22. However, since the KMT’s return to power, is has exceeded that number by seven.
The directors of the National Palace Museum and the Academia Historica are now also presidentially nominated minister-level officials, but as they are exempt from attending Executive Yuan meetings, they do not have the power to make policy decisions.
In my opinion, these two units could easily be folded into lower level government agencies under the Ministry of Education; is there really a need for the National Palace Museum and Academia Sinica to be headed by a person with ministerial authority?
There were also plans to combine the Executive Yuan’s CPA and the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting, and Statistics into the Executive Yuan, but now they are independent organizations under the jurisdiction of the Executive Yuan.
The KMT has always been more lenient with itself and harder on others. When the DPP was in power, third-level government agencies were strictly regulated and capped at 50, but since 2010, the KMT had raised the cap to 70, which needs to be discussed.
Take the Control Yuan’s committee members for example. Tasked with monitoring administrative personnel, the committee was originally designed for 445 people when the KMT ruled China. Now it has 29 members, each with the power equivalent to a minister.
In my research I have found that most countries have just one individual monitoring administrative personnel, with at most three. Japan’s National Personnel Authority, which serves in the same capacity, is only staffed with three members. Conversely, the Examination Yuan Committee should only have three to five members.
Even if the Control Yuan is an absolutely necessity [as stated in Sun’s separation of five powers], it does not need so many staff.
It is understandable that each president feels the need to use vacant positions as some kind of political reward. However, under the current circumstance of national financial hardship, we should endeavor to save money from the small things and start slowly shrinking the size of the government.
Translated by Jake Chung, staff writer
This is part one of a two-part interview. Part II will be published tomorrow.
An increase in Taiwanese boats using China-made automatic identification systems (AIS) could confuse coast guards patrolling waters off Taiwan’s southwest coast and become a loophole in the national security system, sources familiar with the matter said yesterday. Taiwan ADIZ, a Facebook page created by enthusiasts who monitor Chinese military activities in airspace and waters off Taiwan’s southwest coast, on Saturday identified what seemed to be a Chinese cargo container ship near Penghu County. The Coast Guard Administration went to the location after receiving the tip and found that it was a Taiwanese yacht, which had a Chinese AIS installed. Similar instances had also
GOOD DIPLOMACY: The KMT has maintained close contact with representative offices in Taiwan and had extended an invitation to Russia as well, the KMT said The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) would “appropriately handle” the fallout from an invitation it had extended to Russia’s representative to Taipei to attend its international banquet last month, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said yesterday. US and EU representatives in Taiwan boycotted the event, and only later agreed to attend after the KMT rescinded its invitation to the Russian representative. The KMT has maintained long-term close contact with all representative offices and embassies in Taiwan, and had extended the invitation as a practice of good diplomacy, Chu said. “Some EU countries have expressed their opinions of Russia, and the KMT respects that,” he
VIGILANCE: The military is paying close attention to actions that might damage peace and stability in the region, the deputy minister of national defense said The People’s Republic of China (PRC) might consider initiating a hack on Taiwanese networks on May 20, the day of the inauguration ceremony of president-elect William Lai (賴清德), sources familiar with cross-strait issues said. While US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken’s statement of the US expectation “that all sides will conduct themselves with restraint and prudence in the period ahead” would prevent military actions by China, Beijing could still try to sabotage Taiwan’s inauguration ceremony, the source said. China might gain access to the video screens outside of the Presidential Office Building and display embarrassing messages from Beijing, such as congratulating Lai
Four China Coast Guard ships briefly sailed through prohibited waters near Kinmen County, Taipei said, urging Beijing to stop actions that endanger navigation safety. The Chinese ships entered waters south of Kinmen, 5km from the Chinese city of Xiamen, at about 3:30pm on Monday, the Coast Guard Administration said in a statement later the same day. The ships “sailed out of our prohibited and restricted waters” about an hour later, the agency said, urging Beijing to immediately stop “behavior that endangers navigation safety.” Ministry of National Defense spokesman Sun Li-fang (孫立方) yesterday told reporters that Taiwan would boost support to the Coast Guard