The Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) yesterday called for the Legislative Yuan to immediately amend the Referendum Act (公民投票法) and abolish the Referendum Review Committee.
Dissatisfied with the committee’s move to veto his referendum application on the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) on June 4 last year, TSU chairman Huang Kun-huei (黃昆輝) filed an administrative lawsuit in the Taipei High Administrative Court.
The Referendum Act is dubbed the “birdcage” referendum act due to the unusually high eligibility threshold needed to even begin an application for a referendum, making it difficult for the public to propose legislation or amend the Constitution through a referendum.
According to current regulations, more than 80,000 signatures are required to propose a referendum, 870,000 are required to hold one and more than half the electorate must vote, with half of those voting supporting the referendum for it to pass.
After the Administrative Court dismissed his lawsuit, Huang appealed the ruling with the Supreme Administrative Court, which overruled the Taipei High Administrative Court on Thursday and ruled that the committee must review the application.
The court said the rejection of the proposed referendum on the grounds that any proposal on important policies must include a negative description was not stipulated in sub-paragraph 3 in Article 31 of the Referendum Act.
Huang said the decision by the Executive Yuan’s Referendum Review Committee to reject his application deprived people of their right to a referendum and caused the ECFA to be signed without a basis of public support.
The legitimacy of the accord would be determined only after a referendum over the ECFA was held, and the cross-strait investment accord being negotiated should also be suspended immediately, Huang said yesterday.
It has been two years now since the ECFA was signed, but Taiwan’s economy has not only failed to improve, it is trending toward recession, Huang said, adding that pushing for a referendum on the ECFA now could enable people to examine what the ECFA has done for Taiwan, and whether people agree with the government that the ECFA is good for Taiwan.
The illegal actions by the committee have denied people their say on the ECFA even two years after it was signed, Huang said.
“Who can pay the price for such damage to the rights of the people and the loss of the country?” Huang said, adding that the 21 members on the committee should immediately resign to apologize.
Huang said the TSU would be focusing all its efforts on the ECFA referendum and it would seek to gather the 860,000 signatures needed for a second application, adding that the TSU invites all pro-localization organizations and the Democratic Progressive Party to aid in the effort.
Taipei has once again made it to the top 100 in Oxford Economics’ Global Cities Index 2025 report, moving up five places from last year to 60. The annual index, which was published last month, evaluated 1,000 of the most populated metropolises based on five indices — economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance. New York maintained its top spot this year, placing first in the economics index thanks to the strength of its vibrant financial industry and economic stability. Taipei ranked 263rd in economics, 44th in human capital, 15th in quality of life, 284th for environment and 75th in governance,
Greenpeace yesterday said that it is to appeal a decision last month by the Taipei High Administrative Court to dismiss its 2021 lawsuit against the Ministry of Economic Affairs over “loose” regulations governing major corporate electricity consumers. The climate-related lawsuit — the first of its kind in Taiwan — sought to require the government to enforce higher green energy thresholds on major corporations to reduce emissions in light of climate change and an uptick in extreme weather. The suit, filed by Greenpeace East Asia, the Environmental Jurists Association and four individual plaintiffs, was dismissed on May 8 following four years of litigation. The
A former officer in China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who witnessed the aftermath of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre has warned that Taiwan could face a similar fate if China attempts to unify the country by force. Li Xiaoming (李曉明), who was deployed to Beijing as a junior officer during the crackdown, said Taiwanese people should study the massacre carefully, because it offers a glimpse of what Beijing is willing to do to suppress dissent. “What happened in Tiananmen Square could happen in Taiwan too,” Li told CNA in a May 22 interview, ahead of the massacre’s 36th anniversary. “If Taiwanese students or
The New Taipei City Government would assist relatives of those killed or injured in last month’s car-ramming incident in Sansia District (三峽) to secure compensation, Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said yesterday, two days after the driver died in a hospital. “The city government will do its best to help the relatives of the car crash incident seek compensation,” Hou said. The mayor also said that the city’s Legal Affairs, Education and Social Welfare departments have established a joint mechanism to “provide coordinated assistance” to victims and their families. Three people were killed and 12 injured when a car plowed into schoolchildren and their
RSS