The Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) has issued a strongly worded condemnation of the recent proposal that relations between Taiwan and China could be dealt with under a “one country, two areas (一國兩區)” formula.
According to a statement issued in Washington on Tuesday, the proposal — supported by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — puts Taiwan on a “slippery slope” and severely undermines Taiwan’s sovereignty and the freedom to choose its own future.
“We, together with our friends and relatives in Taiwan, have worked hard for a free and democratic Taiwan, and do not want to see those achievements swept away by an authoritarian China,” the statement said. “If the Ma government now agrees that Taiwan is an area under one country then it is implicitly saying that Taiwan is part of the PRC [People’s Republic of China].”
Signed by FAPA president Mark Kao (高龍榮), the statement concludes: “The future of Taiwan should be determined by the Taiwanese people themselves through democratic mechanisms and not negotiated away in shady backroom deals.”
FAPA said former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) suggested in a meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) last month that the “one country, two areas” formula be used.
It was later confirmed that the proposal had been authorized by Ma, FAPA said.
“We firmly believe that Taiwan is a free and democratic country unto itself — an independent and autonomous nation with its own democratically elected government,” Kao said. “Wu’s actions in Beijing dangerously undermine Taiwan’s already-shrinking international space.”
The statement said that the Ma administration’s argument that “one country, two areas” is consistent with the Republic of China Constitution “is simply outlandish.”
The Ma administration’s “new formulation” was also inconsistent with the views held by the “vast majority” of Taiwanese, it said.
A recent TVBS poll showed that only 19 percent of Taiwanese agree with the “one country, two areas” formula.
That formula — applied to Hong Kong — is a “complete non-starter when it comes to Taiwan,” Kao said.
“As citizens who deeply value democracy, we believe that the way the idea was raised was a basic violation of democratic principles,” he said.
“It occurred in a party-to-party forum between CCP-KMT [Chinese Communist Party-Chinese Nationalist Party], two parties that are known for their disregard of democracy,” he said.
“Such a mechanism lacks any transparency, accountability or legislative oversight, and is thus contrary to the basic values for which we stand,” Kao said.
Taipei has once again made it to the top 100 in Oxford Economics’ Global Cities Index 2025 report, moving up five places from last year to 60. The annual index, which was published last month, evaluated 1,000 of the most populated metropolises based on five indices — economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance. New York maintained its top spot this year, placing first in the economics index thanks to the strength of its vibrant financial industry and economic stability. Taipei ranked 263rd in economics, 44th in human capital, 15th in quality of life, 284th for environment and 75th in governance,
Greenpeace yesterday said that it is to appeal a decision last month by the Taipei High Administrative Court to dismiss its 2021 lawsuit against the Ministry of Economic Affairs over “loose” regulations governing major corporate electricity consumers. The climate-related lawsuit — the first of its kind in Taiwan — sought to require the government to enforce higher green energy thresholds on major corporations to reduce emissions in light of climate change and an uptick in extreme weather. The suit, filed by Greenpeace East Asia, the Environmental Jurists Association and four individual plaintiffs, was dismissed on May 8 following four years of litigation. The
A former officer in China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who witnessed the aftermath of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre has warned that Taiwan could face a similar fate if China attempts to unify the country by force. Li Xiaoming (李曉明), who was deployed to Beijing as a junior officer during the crackdown, said Taiwanese people should study the massacre carefully, because it offers a glimpse of what Beijing is willing to do to suppress dissent. “What happened in Tiananmen Square could happen in Taiwan too,” Li told CNA in a May 22 interview, ahead of the massacre’s 36th anniversary. “If Taiwanese students or
The New Taipei City Government would assist relatives of those killed or injured in last month’s car-ramming incident in Sansia District (三峽) to secure compensation, Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said yesterday, two days after the driver died in a hospital. “The city government will do its best to help the relatives of the car crash incident seek compensation,” Hou said. The mayor also said that the city’s Legal Affairs, Education and Social Welfare departments have established a joint mechanism to “provide coordinated assistance” to victims and their families. Three people were killed and 12 injured when a car plowed into schoolchildren and their
RSS