Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) yesterday accused President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of “distorting history” by lying to Taiwanese with his claim that the so-called “1992 consensus” was a decision made during Lee’s presidency.
Lee’s statement, made via a posting on his Facebook page, came as a response to remarks made by Ma in an interview with the Chinese-language China Times on Thursday that the “1992 consensus” had been decided when Lee was president.
In the statement yesterday, Lee said he had publicly stated, on numerous occasions, that there was no consensus during the cross-strait talks in 1992 in Hong Kong, adding that late Straits Exchange Foundation chairman Koo Chen-fu (辜振甫) had also said that there was no such a consensus.
Lee said that Su Chi (蘇起), a former National Security Council secretary under Ma’s administration, had admitted creating the term.
“Ma’s continuous remarks that the ‘1992 consensus’ exists is unacceptable as it is an action that distorts history and is effectively lying to Taiwanese,” Lee said.
Lee said the National Unification Council (NUC) was established because of the conclusion of wartime status across the Strait. Its establishment also included temporary arrangements because of the acceptance of the different opinions within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), Lee said.
The NUC’s actual proposal at the time was “two political entities” and because China was unable to accept the “separate interpretations” of “two political entities,” there was no consensus, Lee said, adding that even now there is no consensus on the “separate interpretation” of “one China.”
The so-called “1992 consensus” referred to by China only has “one China,” and not “one China, with each side having its own interpretation,” Lee said.
“As such, where is the ‘consensus’?” he asked.
If Ma wishes to insist that there is a “1992 consensus,” he should first explain whether China agrees to “separate interpretations” and should also ask Beijing to publicly announce whether they agree to “separate interpretations” and thus acknowledge that the Republic of China (ROC) exists, Lee said.
Otherwise, it is selling out Taiwan’s sovereignty and bowing to China, Lee said.
If Taiwan and China reach a consensus, such an action must first follow a domestic democratic process and the reaching of a domestic consensus, Lee said.
Separately yesterday, Taiwan Solidarity Union Chairman Huang Kun-huei (黃昆輝) called a press conference and said Ma’s talk of the “1992 consensus” was in effect murdering the ROC.
He went on to urge voters to support Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in next month’s elections.
Urging voters to “abandon Ma and save Taiwan,” Huang added that “a government which cares nothing for the people is already severely threatening the democratic development of Taiwan.”
Translated by Jake Chung, Staff Writer
Taipei has once again made it to the top 100 in Oxford Economics’ Global Cities Index 2025 report, moving up five places from last year to 60. The annual index, which was published last month, evaluated 1,000 of the most populated metropolises based on five indices — economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance. New York maintained its top spot this year, placing first in the economics index thanks to the strength of its vibrant financial industry and economic stability. Taipei ranked 263rd in economics, 44th in human capital, 15th in quality of life, 284th for environment and 75th in governance,
Greenpeace yesterday said that it is to appeal a decision last month by the Taipei High Administrative Court to dismiss its 2021 lawsuit against the Ministry of Economic Affairs over “loose” regulations governing major corporate electricity consumers. The climate-related lawsuit — the first of its kind in Taiwan — sought to require the government to enforce higher green energy thresholds on major corporations to reduce emissions in light of climate change and an uptick in extreme weather. The suit, filed by Greenpeace East Asia, the Environmental Jurists Association and four individual plaintiffs, was dismissed on May 8 following four years of litigation. The
A former officer in China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who witnessed the aftermath of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre has warned that Taiwan could face a similar fate if China attempts to unify the country by force. Li Xiaoming (李曉明), who was deployed to Beijing as a junior officer during the crackdown, said Taiwanese people should study the massacre carefully, because it offers a glimpse of what Beijing is willing to do to suppress dissent. “What happened in Tiananmen Square could happen in Taiwan too,” Li told CNA in a May 22 interview, ahead of the massacre’s 36th anniversary. “If Taiwanese students or
The New Taipei City Government would assist relatives of those killed or injured in last month’s car-ramming incident in Sansia District (三峽) to secure compensation, Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said yesterday, two days after the driver died in a hospital. “The city government will do its best to help the relatives of the car crash incident seek compensation,” Hou said. The mayor also said that the city’s Legal Affairs, Education and Social Welfare departments have established a joint mechanism to “provide coordinated assistance” to victims and their families. Three people were killed and 12 injured when a car plowed into schoolchildren and their
RSS