A National Communications Commission (NCC) official faced tough questioning yesterday at the legislature’s Transportation Committee over the commission’s review of the Want Want China Times Group’s proposal to purchase China Network Systems.
The session started off on a bad note as lawmakers were displeased to see that only one of the seven commissioners — National Communications Commission Chairperson Su Herng (蘇蘅) — was at the session.
The lawmakers asked Su why three of the commissioners had quit reviewing the case.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾) asked whether the three commissioners were afraid to review the case, and suggested that since they had decided to avoid the case, then they should resign from their post.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Kuo Wen-cheng (郭玟成) said that having nearly half of the commissioners run away from reviewing a case was ridiculous.
DPP Legislator Yeh Yi-jin (葉宜津) asked if the proposed merger would be decided by the four remaining commissioners — three of whom specialize in telecommunications or Internet communications.
Su said she had tried to invite the three commissioners back, but that according to regulations, the remaining four could continue the review process.
Legislators also expressed concern that approving the merger would lead to a media monopoly that could reduce media diversity and freedom of the press.
Citing the Rupert Murdoch and News Corp scandal, Lo said the commission should consider whether approving Want Want’s proposed merger would have the -effect of creating a media monster.
Yeh asked if the commission had done its research and investigated how many households would be affected by the merger.
When Su replied that the data had been provided by Want Want, Yeh said the commission should be more aggressive in acquiring information related to the case to win the public’s trust.
Yeh asked Su to set a clear deadline of when the commission could decide on a set of standards for reviewing the case.
“With no clear review standards, how can you tell us you will be able to review the case fairly,” Yeh said.
“You have to promise us that the decision would not be made before clear review standards are set,” Yeh said.
Su did not give Yeh a definitive answer except to repeatedly say: “We will make an effort,” adding that she would forward the lawmakers’ advice to the commission.
DPP Legislator Lin Shu-fen (林淑芬) asked if the commission knew about a memo between Want Want and China Network Systems that the merger deal would end if Want Want could not gain its approval before the end of this year.
She urged the commission not to rush into a decision when there were still so many issues that need to be resolved to address public concerns.
Su said she did not know about the memo, but that the commission would follow strict standards in reviewing the case.
As for the legislators’ questions about whether Want Want’s merger funds include Chinese money and whether this might affect its media content, Su said investigation of the funding sources was done by the Ministry of Economic Affairs.
Su also maintained during the session that she could not answer some of the lawmakers’ questions because she could not make public the content of the ongoing review process and that as the commission works as a collegiate system, she could not represent the commission.
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) yesterday reported the first case of a new COVID-19 subvariant — BA.3.2 — in a 10-year-old Singaporean girl who had a fever upon arrival in Taiwan and tested positive for the disease. The girl left Taiwan on March 20 and the case did not have a direct impact on the local community, it said. The WHO added the BA.3.2 strain to its list of Variants Under Monitoring in December last year, but this was the first imported case of the COVID-19 variant in Taiwan, CDC Deputy Director-General Lin Ming-cheng (林明誠) said. The girl arrived in Taiwan on
South Korea is planning to revise its controversial electronic arrival card, a step Taiwanese officials said prompted them to hold off on planned retaliatory measures, a South Korean media report said yesterday. A Yonhap News Agency report said that the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs is planning to remove the “previous departure place” and “next destination” fields from its e-arrival card system. The plan, reached after interagency consultations, is under review and aims to simplify entry procedures and align the electronic form with the paper version, a South Korean ministry official said. The fields — which appeared only on the electronic form
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) is suspending retaliation measures against South Korea that were set to take effect tomorrow, after Seoul said it is updating its e-arrival system, MOFA said today. The measures were to be a new round of retaliation after Taiwan on March 1 changed South Korea's designation on government-issued alien resident certificates held by South Korean nationals to "South Korea” from the "Republic of Korea," the country’s official name. The move came after months of protests to Seoul over its listing of Taiwan as "China (Taiwan)" in dropdown menus on its new online immigration entry system. MOFA last week
A bipartisan group of US senators has introduced a bill to enhance cooperation with Taiwan on drone development and to reduce reliance on supply chains linked to China. The proposed Blue Skies for Taiwan Act of 2026 was introduced by Republican US senators Ted Cruz and John Curtis, and Democratic US senators Jeff Merkley and Andy Kim. The legislation seeks to ease constraints on Taiwan-US cooperation in uncrewed aerial systems (UAS), including dependence on China-sourced components, limited access to capital and regulatory barriers under US export controls, a news release issued by Cruz on Wednesday said. The bill would establish a "Blue UAS
RSS