A new study by a China security expert at the US National Defense University cautioned that there might be a distinct downside to deeper cross-strait rapprochement between Taiwan and China.
Closer ties between the two sides could raise the prospect of “fundamental changes in China’s security challenges,” its author Michael Glosny said.
Glosny said that while other countries would be relieved by the rapprochement, many would also worry that a rising China no longer constrained by a focus on Taiwan would use its increased power to “challenge their interests elsewhere in Asia.”
“Former US Ambassador to China James Lilley referred to Taiwan as ‘the cork in China’s bottle,’” Glosny wrote. “Deeper rapprochement will remove the cork, freeing resources devoted to military preparation for Taiwan contingencies and giving the People’s Liberation Army [PLA] new options.”
The study, Getting Beyond Taiwan — Chinese Foreign Policy and PLA Modernization, just released by the Institute for National Strategic Studies, says that since the mid-1990s, China’s military modernization has focused on deterring Taiwanese independence and preparing for a military response if deterrence fails.
Given China’s assumption of US intervention in a conflict over Taiwan, the PLA has been developing military capabilities to deter, delay and disrupt US military support operations.
“The 2008 election of Taiwan President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has contributed to improved cross-strait economic and political cooperation and dramatically reduced the threat of Taiwan independence and war across the Taiwan Strait,” Glosny wrote.
Deeper rapprochement over the next five to 10 years would clearly be a positive development — removing the most likely source of war between the US and China, he said.
However, at the same time it would leave China free to “turn its attention” to other countries in the region.
“If China was no longer constrained by its focus on Taiwan, it could undermine regional stability. Maritime Southeast Asian states would worry that China might seize the Spratly Islands ... China might try to seize the Senkaku/Diaoyutai Islands or aggressively challenge Japan’s exclusive economic zone claims,” Glosny wrote.
“India would worry that China might take a tougher stance on unresolved land border disputes. Russia would fear that an unrestrained China could mount an aggressive move into the Russian Far East, both to reclaim territory and to try to seize energy resources in Siberia,” he added.
The study said that to date, countries in the region had been reluctant to pressure China to explain its skyrocketing defense budget and defense modernization plans.
“The removal of the Taiwan issue will make regional countries more likely to demand such explanations, as well as greater military transparency,” Glosny wrote. “This is likely to make China’s relations with its neighbors more acrimonious and make it more difficult to reassure them that it has peaceful and cooperative intentions.”
If the US reacts by strengthening defense ties with Asian countries, China could “unleash spirals of hostility,” the study said.
But if, on the other hand, the US reduces its presence in Asia, it could “lead to an independent Japan that acquires nuclear weapons and devotes more resources to military modernization,” it said.
“Regional powers, even without cooperation with Washington, are powerful enough to complicate China’s international environment, especially if they work together to prevent China’s dominance,” it said.
Nor will smooth relations across the Strait necessarily ensure better US-China relations.
“Shifting power dynamics often lead to friction, competition, and conflict,” the study said.
“American leaders would worry that China might try not only to drive US forces away from China’s coastal waters, but also to push the US out of East Asia. China might also devote significant resources to wage a global battle for military and political influence around the world,” he said.
“For Asia and the US, deeper rapprochement across the Strait will remove one major problem but will add a new layer of apprehension and concern about China’s future behavior on top of the existing uncertainties,” he said.
EVA Airways today confirmed the death of a flight attendant on Saturday upon their return to Taiwan and said an internal investigation has been launched, as criticism mounted over a social media post accusing the airline of failing to offer sufficient employee protections. According to the post, the flight attendant complained of feeling sick on board a flight, but was unable to take sick leave or access medical care. The crew member allegedly did not receive assistance from the chief purser, who failed to heed their requests for medical attention or call an ambulance once the flight landed, the post said. As sick
A drunk woman was sexually assaulted inside a crowded concourse of Taipei Railway Station on Thursday last week before a foreign tourist notified police, leading to calls for better education on bystander intervention and review of security infrastructure. The man, surnamed Chiu (邱), was taken into custody on charges of sexual assault, taking advantage of the woman’s condition and public indecency. Police discovered that Chiu was a fugitive with prior convictions for vehicle theft. He has been taken into custody and is to complete his unserved six-month sentence, police said. On Thursday last week, Chiu was seen wearing a white
EVA Airways, one of the leading international carriers in Taiwan, yesterday said that it was investigating reports that a cabin crew manager had ignored the condition of a sick flight attendant, who died on Saturday. The airline made the statement in response to a post circulating on social media that said that the flight attendant on an outbound flight was feeling sick and notified the cabin crew manager. Although the flight attendant grew increasingly ill on the return flight, the manager did not contact Medlink — a system that connects the aircraft to doctors on the ground for treatment advice during medical
The Taichung District Court yesterday confirmed its final ruling that the marriage between teenage heir Lai (賴) and a man surnamed Hsia (夏) was legally invalid, preventing Hsia from inheriting Lai’s NT$500 million (US$16.37 million) estate. The court confirmed that Hsia chose not to appeal the civil judgement after the court handed down its ruling in June, making the decision final. In the June ruling, the court said that Lai, 18, and Hsia, 26, showed “no mutual admiration before the marriage” and that their interactions were “distant and unfamiliar.” The judge concluded that the couple lacked the “true intention of
RSS