The Council for Hakka Affairs (CHA) praised the legislature’s passage of the Hakka Basic Act (客家基本法) on Tuesday as a milestone in preserving Hakka culture, but activists were more reserved on what impact the Act would have.
The Hakka Basic Act, proposed by the council last year, aims to preserve Hakka culture and encourage the use of the Hakka language in public affairs. The Act requires counties and cities with a population that is more than 10 percent Hakka to create an agency to manage Hakka affairs. It also requires a Hakka language test in certain national exams and requires public servants in townships and cities where more than one-third of the population is Hakka to pass the Hakka proficiency test.
The Act also stipulates that at public places like schools, hospitals, train stations and courts, public announcements must be made in Hakka along with other languages and Hakka translation services must be available.
In addition, the Act asks the government to create a “Hakka Day.”
“We Hakka are not asking for privileges — all the clauses in the Hakka Basic Act are positive and non-exclusive measures aimed at granting equal rights [for Hakka] but not at the expense of other ethnic groups” CHA Minister Huang Yu-chen (黃玉振) said in a statement. “Hence it’s a law that will protect the ethnic and cultural diversity in this country.”
“It’s a milestone in Hakka affairs, and draws a long-lasting blue print for the development of the Hakka people,” he said.
Some Hakka activists and academics were reserved about what impact the Act would have.
“Of course the Hakka Basic Act will have a positive effect [on the protection of Hakka culture], but the question is: ‘How big will the impact be?’” said Chiang Ming-hsiu (江明修), dean of the College of Hakka Studies at National Central University.
He said that the former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government and the current Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government have done much to preserve Hakka culture, and that the Act still leaves most policy-making power in the hands of the government.
“So the main function of the law is to provide a legal basis on what the government is already doing,” Chiang said.
Lee Chiao (李喬), a long-time Hakka culture preservationist and writer, said that the intention behind the Hakka Basic Act is very good, “but the key will be how the law is turned into policies, how these policies are implemented and what exact measures the government has in mind.”
DPP Department of Hakka Affairs director Yiong Cong-ziin (楊長鎮) criticized the Act as a “blank cartridge.”
“The law appears to be very good at first sight, but take a closer look and you find it’s actually empty inside,” Yiong told the Taipei Times by telephone. “Eighty percent of the contents can be implemented through executive measures, and thus there’s no need to go through all the trouble of making a new law for those.”
He said that, for instance, having public announcements in Hakka at public places such as train stations is a policy that has been in practice since the DPP was in power.
“A Hakka Basic Act should deal with something more fundamental, not some policy measures that can be done even without a law,” Yiong said.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods