Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) appeared in court yesterday for his final pre-trial hearing in which the defense and the prosecution continued to argue over the need to summon potential witnesses.
At his hearing last Wednesday, Chen and his lawyers requested that the court summon more than 30 witnesses, including former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), former Chinese Nationalist Party chairman Lien Chan (連戰), Special Investigation Panel (SIP) prosecutor Yueh Fang-ju (越方如) and Chen's son, Chen Chih-chung (陳致中).
Chen's lawyer, Cheng Wen-lung (鄭文龍), yesterday asked the court to summon six more witnesses in connection with the presidential “state affairs fund” and the Longtan (龍潭) land deal cases. Cheng requested that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), among others, be summoned to clarify how the presidential “state affairs fund” is used.
PHOTO: CNA
Prosecutors dismissed the need to summon several witnesses, including Ma, Lee and Lien, saying they were irrelevant to the case.
In response, Cheng said that because the “state affairs fund” had always been used as a special fund by presidents and heads of government agencies, it was important to ask past and present presidents how they used the fund.
“Lee used a larger portion of the [fund] and the reimbursement process was not as secure. Why didn't the Special Investigation Panel investigate Lee? Does the SIP think his expenses are legal, but Chen Shui-bian's are illegal?” Cheng said.
Defense attorneys said Ma should be called as he declassified papers that had previously been classified under Chen Shui-bian's administration for political reasons, and the best way for the court to verify this was to call him to give testimony.
Yueh should be called to answer questions on whether prosecutors struck a deal with former Chinatrust Financial Holding Co vice chairman Jeffrey Koo Jr (辜仲諒) to persuade him to return to Taiwan and testify against the former first family, Cheng said.
When the court asked for Chen Shui-bian's comment, the former president spoke for an hour.
Chen Shui-bian said he suspected foul play in the way prosecutor Eric Chen (陳瑞仁) questioned Lee about his usage of the “state affairs fund.”
“Eric Chen can question [Lee] for hours and then afterwards let Lee treat him to a meal ... This is very strange,” he said.
He then listed several instances in which Lien and Ma had inappropriately taken large amounts of money from special funds and used them for personal expenses.
Prosecutors rebutted the defense's arguments by saying that how the “state affairs fund” is used should be determined by law — not the subjective views given by witnesses.
Responding to an argument by Chen Shui-bian's lawyers that prosecutors have allowed politics to influence the case, prosecutor Lin Che-hui said: “Prosecutors act on behalf of the country, not any individual person.”
Lin said that Chen Shui-bian and his lawyers' attempt to politicize the case by “guessing at the motives behind the investigation is meaningless.”
He added that if the former president suspected prosecutors had cut a deal with Koo, this could be brought out during cross examination.
Presiding Judge Tsai Shou-hsun (蔡守訓) later announced his decision, rejecting requests to summon Ma, Lee, Lien and Yueh, but approved the calling of 35 other witnesses.
Cheng also retracted his request to summon Chen Chih-chung to prevent the idea of a “huge confrontation between father and son.”
Prosecutors requested that the court summon Wu Wang-hsia (吳王霞), the mother of former first lady Wu Shu-jen (吳淑珍), to clarify whether Wu Shu-jen had used her mother's account to transfer money and to determine how much the former first couple knew about such money transfers. Tsai approved the request.
The two sides reached an agreement that the Longtan land deal would be tried before the “state affairs fund” and money-laundering cases. Chen Shui-bian and his lawyers asked the court to speed up the trial by scheduling more witnesses to appear on the same day.
“We just hope that we can hurry up and be done with the necessary proceedings. After all, [Chen Shui-bian] is still being detained,” Cheng later told reporters.
The first day of trial will be next Thursday, when the court will call Wu Shu-jen's friend Tsai Ming-chieh (蔡明杰) and Taiwan Cement Group (台泥) chairman Leslie Koo (辜成允) to testify.
Meanwhile, the SIP yesterday announced that the former first family's physician, Huang Fang-yen (黃芳彥), has been placed on the wanted list.
The SIP had said it would put Huang on the wanted list if he continued to ignore the summons for questioning.
Local cable TV stations have aired footage showing Huang living in California. Although Huang has told reporters he would return to Taiwan as soon as he has taken care of personal matters in the US, he has not answered the prosecution's summons.
Citing the Code of Criminal Procedure (刑事訴訟法), SIP spokesperson Chen Yun-nan (陳雲南) said that prosecutors may arrest a person if he ignores three summons. Prosecutors may also put the person on the wanted list if law enforcement personnel are unsure of his or her whereabouts.
“Huang is suspected of helping the former first lady hide diamonds, jewelry and NT$60 million [US$2 million],” Chen Yun-nan said.
Huang was listed as a defendant two weeks ago for allegedly violating the Money Laundering Control Act (洗錢防制法) by helping the former first family hide and launder money.
Taipei has once again made it to the top 100 in Oxford Economics’ Global Cities Index 2025 report, moving up five places from last year to 60. The annual index, which was published last month, evaluated 1,000 of the most populated metropolises based on five indices — economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance. New York maintained its top spot this year, placing first in the economics index thanks to the strength of its vibrant financial industry and economic stability. Taipei ranked 263rd in economics, 44th in human capital, 15th in quality of life, 284th for environment and 75th in governance,
Greenpeace yesterday said that it is to appeal a decision last month by the Taipei High Administrative Court to dismiss its 2021 lawsuit against the Ministry of Economic Affairs over “loose” regulations governing major corporate electricity consumers. The climate-related lawsuit — the first of its kind in Taiwan — sought to require the government to enforce higher green energy thresholds on major corporations to reduce emissions in light of climate change and an uptick in extreme weather. The suit, filed by Greenpeace East Asia, the Environmental Jurists Association and four individual plaintiffs, was dismissed on May 8 following four years of litigation. The
A former officer in China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who witnessed the aftermath of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre has warned that Taiwan could face a similar fate if China attempts to unify the country by force. Li Xiaoming (李曉明), who was deployed to Beijing as a junior officer during the crackdown, said Taiwanese people should study the massacre carefully, because it offers a glimpse of what Beijing is willing to do to suppress dissent. “What happened in Tiananmen Square could happen in Taiwan too,” Li told CNA in a May 22 interview, ahead of the massacre’s 36th anniversary. “If Taiwanese students or
The New Taipei City Government would assist relatives of those killed or injured in last month’s car-ramming incident in Sansia District (三峽) to secure compensation, Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said yesterday, two days after the driver died in a hospital. “The city government will do its best to help the relatives of the car crash incident seek compensation,” Hou said. The mayor also said that the city’s Legal Affairs, Education and Social Welfare departments have established a joint mechanism to “provide coordinated assistance” to victims and their families. Three people were killed and 12 injured when a car plowed into schoolchildren and their
RSS