Fri, Sep 12, 2008 page3

• AIT denies tougher guidelines

  NO CHANGE? US State Department guidelines on relations with Taiwan issued to all diplomatic personnel this month were almost twice as long as the 2006 version

  • By Charles Snyder / STAFF REPORTER IN WASHINGTON
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  A comparison of State Department guidelines issued this month to all US diplomatic personnel explaining US policy on interactions with Taiwan and a parallel document issued in September 2006 shows that the latest guidelines contain a broad range of new prohibitions, despite statements by US and Taiwanese officials that the new guidelines offer “nothing new.”

  The new guidelines, sent to all US diplomatic posts in an annual cable in advance of the Double Ten Day celebrations, are nearly twice as long as the 2006 document. The Taipei Times obtained a copy of the 2006 version on Wednesday.

  Officials at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) became the first officials from either side to confirm the existence of the guidelines after a story about them appeared in the Taipei Times on Tuesday.

  The Taipei Times has yet to receive a copy of last year’s guidelines, so it was not clear whether the additional prohibitions were added this month or a year ago, when tensions between US President George W. Bush, seeking China’s international support, and former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) were at rock bottom.

  But the 2006 document contained significantly fewer prohibitions than the current one.

  For instance, this year’s cable added a ban on flying the Taiwanese flag at any US government building, inserted a long section that severely limits US correspondence with Taiwanese officials, makes reference to the US’ so-called “one China” policy, contains a long section on the US’ policy toward Taiwan’s membership in international organizations and has a detailed list of curbs and prohibitions on travel by US officials to Taiwan.

  None of these appeared in the 2006 cable.

  In no part of the recent document are the tight restrictions on meetings between US and Taiwanese officials relaxed.

  The cables are based on US government restrictions on interactions with Taiwan in force in one form or another since the US broke diplomatic relations in 1978, and most recently issued as formal guidelines in 2001, just after Bush took office. However, references in the 2006 cable indicate that the annual cables have been issued at least since 1991, when Bush’s father, George Bush, was president.

  One of the more striking additions to the current cable is the section on Taiwan’s international participation, which does not directly relate to the cable’s main subject.

  “Consistent with our one China policy,” it says, the US does not support Taiwanese membership in organizations requiring statehood, although it does support “as appropriate” Taiwan’s “involvement” in other international bodies.

  “Within the parameters of our one China policy,” it adds, the US “does not take a position on what Taiwan’s title should be in international organizations. The United States supports flexible arrangements and nomenclature acceptable to both the PRC [People’s Republic of China] and Taiwan and opposes attempts by either side to use nomenclature for political purposes inconsistent with US policy.”

  Washington’s “overall goal,” it says, is “to enable the people on [sic] Taiwan to comply with international regulations and guidelines and receive appropriate international assistance and advice, despite Taipei’s general lack of recognition as an independent state.”

  If that paragraph was added last year, as appears likely, instead of this month, that would coincide with Chen’s efforts to win an election-day referendum to have Taiwan join the UN using the name Taiwan, a move, vehemently opposed by both China and the Bush administration, that poisoned Washington-Taipei relations last year.

  The other additions to the cable, such as the travel restrictions, the convoluted rules on written correspondence and the strictures on attending official affairs and parties, are not inconsistent with the 2001 guidelines.

  In Taiwan, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday reiterated that the latest guidelines do not offer any new insight into Washington’s Taiwan policy.

  The document, ministry spokesman Henry Chen (陳銘政) said, has been sent each year since 1991 and although there have been minor changes, the overall principles remain the same.

  AIT Director Stephen Young echoed Henry Chen’s remarks and said that US policy toward Taiwan had “not changed at all.”

  “The media just made a story out of it,” he said yesterday.

  AIT Press Officer Lawrence Walker said the AIT was a non-governmental organization that is instructed to carry out unofficial relations between Taiwan and the US and therefore a bulk of the guidelines do not pertain to AIT staff, such as attending the Double Ten Day celebrations.

  ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY JENNY W. HSU
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Taiwan denies hacking, as China issues bounties

  • 2

    Chinese carrier group entered Japanese waters

  • 3

    Taiwan in Time: Snapshots of early Japanese-era Taipei

  • 4

    Woman sentenced to six years for recruiting for China

  • 5

    Greenpeace to appeal dismissal of regulations suit