When the Taiwan Broadcasting System (TBS, 公廣集團) was established two years ago, its mission was to provide the nation with a truly independent, non-profit public television service free from state interference.
However, the problems and conflicts of the past two years have led some to question whether the consolidation of five television stations has succeeded in creating one large independent public medium.
TBS consists of the Chinese Television Station (CTS), the Public Television Station (PTS), Hakka TV, Taiwan Indigenous Television (TiTV) and Taiwan Macroview Television, with each having different historical backgrounds and sources of funding.
PTS is supervised by the Public Television Service Foundation, whose operation is partially funded by the government while CTS was previously owned by the military. Although the Statue Regarding the Disposition of Government Shareholdings in the Terrestrial Television Industry (無線電視事業公股處理條例) dictated that political parties, the government and military withdraw from media operations, it also required one of the previously state-run TV stations to remain a public asset.
While Taiwan Television (TTV) went private, CTS became a member station of TBS.
Hakka TV and TiTV are funded by the Council of Hakka Affairs and the Indigenous Peoples Commission respectively. Each provides about NT$400 million (US$13 million) to subsidize their station. Their funding is partially appropriated by the PTS Foundation to offer program production support to both stations.
Macroview Television is in charge of TV broadcasts to overseas Taiwanese and is funded by the Overseas Compatriot Affairs Commission.
From the beginning, PTS and CTS management constantly argued over the style of news they should present, with the former criticizing the latter for having too much advertising in news broadcasts.
CTS, on other hand, has always been a commercial television station, but it is now commissioned to function as a public service. As such, CTS has had to forgo some sources of commercial revenue, such as running campaign ads for political parties.
While PBS receives annual funding of NT$900 million from the Government Information Office, CTS receives no subsidies.
Its status as a public medium also restricts the types of program CTS can produce. Shrinking ratings and advertising worsened its situation and the station had accumulated losses of NT$1 billion even before it became a public service broadcaster.
Neither Hakka TV or TiTV have benefited much from the consolidation. Both continued to outsource a majority of their production to private contractors or other TV stations. The PTS Foundation merely placed some of their production crews under the management of both stations.
Lawmakers are not satisfied with the operation of TBS. In a legislative meeting last month, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) described TBS as a “bottomless money pit.”
She suggested selling CTS to an interested private investor as TBS simply cannot afford to bear CTS’ financial losses year after year.
Wei Ti (魏玓), an assistant professor of communications and technology at National Chiao Tung University, disagreed.
He said investment in the public television system was small compared with other countries.
Wei said on average, the annual amount invested in public television is NT$389 per person in South Korea and NT$3,376 in Britain. In Taiwan, the amount is just NT$39 per person, he said.
Chen Shi-tsung (陳信聰), a former research fellow in the PTS’ strategy research and development department, said there would not be a public TV system big enough to compete with commercial television if CTS was spun off from TBS.
Chen said the Government Information Office should be the only government agency budgeting operational funds for TBS. To do so, the Public Broadcasting Act (公共廣播電視法) must be amended, he said.
POLAM KOPITIAM CASE: Of the two people still in hospital, one has undergone a liver transplant and is improving, while the other is being evaluated for a liver transplant A fourth person has died from bongkrek acid poisoning linked to the Polam Kopitiam (寶林茶室) restaurant in Taipei’s Far Eastern Sogo Xinyi A13 Department Store, the Ministry of Health and Welfare said yesterday, as two other people remain seriously ill in hospital. The first death was reported on March 24. The man had been 39 years old and had eaten at the restaurant on March 22. As more cases of suspected food poisoning involving people who had eaten at the restaurant were reported by hospitals on March 26, the ministry and the Taipei Department of Health launched an investigation. The Food and
The long-awaited Taichung aquarium is expected to open next year after more than a decade of development. The building in Cingshui District (清水) is to feature a large ocean aquarium on the first floor, coral display area on the second floor, a jellyfish tank and Dajia River (大甲溪) basin display on the third, a river estuary display and restaurant on the fourth, and a cafe and garden on the fifth. As it is near Wuci Fishing Port (梧棲漁港), many are expecting the opening of the aquarium to bring more tourism to the harbor. Speaking at the city council on Monday, Taichung City Councilor
A fourth person has died in a food poisoning outbreak linked to the Xinyi (信義) branch of Malaysian restaurant chain Polam Kopitiam (寶林茶室) in Taipei, Deputy Minister of Health and Welfare Victor Wang (王必勝) said on Monday. It was the second fatality in three days, after another was announced on Saturday. The 40-year-old woman experienced multiple organ failure in the early hours on Monday, and the family decided not to undergo emergency resuscitation, Wang said. She initially showed signs of improvement after seeking medical treatment for nausea, vomiting and diarrhea, but her condition worsened due to an infection, he said. Two others who
Taiwanese should be mindful when visiting China, as Beijing in July is likely to tighten the implementation of policies on national security following the introduction of two regulations, a researcher said on Saturday. China on Friday unveiled the regulations governing the law enforcement and judicial activities of national security agencies. They would help crack down on “illegal” and “criminal” activities that Beijing considers to be endangering national security, according to reports by China’s state media. The definition of what constitutes a national security threat in China is vague, Taiwan Thinktank researcher Wu Se-chih (吳瑟致) said. The two procedural regulations are to provide Chinese