Pro-independence groups yesterday criticized president-elect Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), accusing him of breaking his election pledges to safeguard Taiwan’s sovereignty by accepting the idea that each side of the Taiwan Strait should be entitled to have its own interpretation of “one China.”
“We were touched when we heard Ma say he would defend Taiwan’s sovereignty with his life. However, sovereignty is not something Ma will be able to defend by sacrificing his life if [Taiwan] falls into this trap,” Northern Taiwan Society deputy director Janice Chen (陳昭姿) said at a press conference co-hosted with other pro-independence groups.
Ma has said he would resume talks with China if Beijing accepts the principle of “one China, with each side having its own interpretation.”
He also expressed optimism after a telephone conversation between Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and US President George W. Bush late last month.
Hu reportedly indicated in the phone conversation that he would be willing to reopen cross-strait talks on the basis of the so-called “1992 consensus,” which states that both sides agree to allow separate interpretations of “one China” on the two sides of the Strait.
The “1992 consensus” is not universally recognized as valid in Taiwan.
However, as Chinese state-run media have not reported that Hu and Bush broached the idea of separate interpretations during their conversation, Ma, who says Beijing agreed to the principle in 1992, said he would seek more information on the content of the conversation.
At yesterday’s press conference, the pro-independence groups urged the public to “be ready to take to streets” if Ma agrees to the idea of “one China” with separate interpretations.
“Some people might think the idea harmless if Taiwan can benefit from engaging with China, but the danger is that the ‘Taiwan issue’ will be considered by the international community to be China’s `internal affair,’” Northern Taiwan Society president Chang Shyue-Yih (張學逸) said.
Southern Taiwan Society president Cheng Cheng-iok (鄭正煜) said that accepting a consensus based on the “one China” policy was no different than agreeing with Beijing that Taiwan is part of China.
China’s definition of “one China” is that “there is only one China in the world, the People’s Republic of China being its sole legal government, and Taiwan is part of it,” Cheng said, adding that this leaves no room for Taiwan to have its own interpretation.
“If it is not that Ma is stupid enough to fall into this political trap set by China, it must be that Ma is so shrewd that he has devised this trick to dupe the public into believing that Taiwan could have its own definition of ‘one China’ [under the consensus],” he said.
Taiwan Hakka Society president Chang Yeh-shen (張葉森) urged Ma not to accept the “1992 consensus” without challenging Beijing’s definition of what “one China” means.
Central Taiwan Society president Michael Tai (戴正德) said Ma’s talk of the “consensus” ran counter to his campaign promise that the nation’s future would be decided by the 23 million people of Taiwan alone and not by China.
“Taiwan’s public, we have to prepare. If Ma accepts [this principle] we need to come forward and defend Taiwan’s sovereignty and dignity,” Tai said.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods