Wed, Dec 05, 2007 News Editorials 636215326 visits
 Photo News
 More Taiwan News
 Johnny Neihu
 
 Community Compass
 
  • Back Issue

  •   << >>   Full List

  • TaipeiTimes
  •   Subscribe
  •   Advertise
  •   Employment
  •   FAQ
  •   About Us
  •   Contact Us
  •   Copyright
  • Search Most Read Story Most Viewed Photo
     Print
     Mail
     wiki links

    DPP defends 228 bill on crime probe

    RESPONSIBILITY: The KMT warned that the bill could impact on many innocent lives, while the DPP accused the KMT of trying to scare the public by twisting its intentions
    By Jimmy Chuang
    STAFF REPORTERS
    Wednesday, Dec 05, 2007, Page 3

    Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus secretary-general Wang Sing-nan (王幸男) vowed yesterday to push a proposed bill on investigating crimes committed during the 228 Incident and the White Terror era despite fierce opposition from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).

    "The KMT has said that the act would condemn all family members, even those that were not involved. But I believe in the bill and am willing to debate the content with any KMT member to prove them wrong," Wang said. "If I lose, I will resign as lawmaker. If they lose, they should leave the KMT or apologize."

    The draft bill would require family members of deceased defendants to assist in the investigation and attend trials on their behalf. The KMT said it was unreasonable as it would involve a large number of innocent people.

    Wang held a press conference at the legislature yesterday to rebut the KMT's claims and said that the opposition was manipulating the issue for electoral gains.

    "Nothing in the proposal says that an innocent family member will have to take responsibility on behalf of a guilty person if the guilty party is deceased," Wang said. "The KMT is simply twisting the issue."

    Wang said that the proposal was his and DPP caucus whip Wang Tuoh's (王拓) idea and had nothing to do with the DPP legislative caucus. He said its sole objective was to continue with investigations into the truth.

    Wang said he would continue to fight for the proposal rather than withdraw it in the face of KMT criticism.

    "There's still a long way to go," he said.

    When approached for comment in Taoyuan yesterday, KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said the proposed bill could backfire given its long-ranging implications.

    "The public thinks that the bill, if passed, will only involve relatives to the ninth degree [of the oppressor], but in fact, the bill could affect more than three generations [of the oppressors' family]," Ma said.

    Ma said that the proposal went against the legal principle that only the defendant should be held responsible for the crime.

    "It's therefore a very bad proposal," Ma said. "Moreover, I think the proposal would put family members of the victims of the 228 Incident in a difficult position."

    Ma also criticized the DPP's handling of the 228 Incident, saying it had not really taken the incident seriously in the past few years.

    "It's like what Chen Fang-ming [陳芳明] said, [the DPP] puts the issue aside every time after manipulating it," Ma said, quoting Chen, a professor of Taiwanese literature at National Chengchi University, from an article in yesterday's Chinese-language China Times.

    Meanwhile, KMT Legislator Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇) told a press conference that if the DPP's proposal passed, it could result in a "new 228 Incident" because the proposal could lead to nonstop reprisals.

    Wu urged Wang to apologize to the public, adding that DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) should relieve Wang as DPP caucus whip if he does not approve of Wang's proposal.

    KMT Legislator Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), who was also at the conference, called Wang a "terrorist," adding that Wang was not in a position to make such a proposal.

    Hung was referring to Wang's past, when Wang sent a letter bomb to then provincial governor Hsieh Tung-min (謝東閔) in October 1976. Hsieh lost a hand in the explosion.

    Wang was sentenced to life in prison in 1977, but was released on parole on May 5, 1990.

    "As a family member of a victim of the White Terror era, I felt great sorrow when I saw the bill," said Hung, whose father was imprisoned on Green Island because of political persecution.

    Also See: EDITORIAL: 228 bill fights injustice with injustice
    This story has been viewed 1562 times.

  • Advertising