Semantic quibbles on the "1992 consensus" are not Beijing's primary design in meeting with opposition leaders, an expert on cross-strait affairs said yesterday.
"Beijing is not overly concerned about [these] communiques [with opposition leaders], because ultimately it has to be acceptable to the government," said Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), professor of China Studies at Tamkang University, suggesting that Beijing was more interested in using the opportunity to clarify its political stance on Taiwan.
Chang was responding to People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong's (宋楚瑜) introduction yesterday of the notion of "two sides on each side of the Strait, one China" to replace the so-called "1992 consensus." Soong put forth the notion in a communique issued after a meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao (宋楚瑜).
Beijing's other primary motivation in extending invitations to Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
He expressed doubt over whether Soong's semantic contribution to the debate on the existence or not of a "1992 consensus" could make much headway in resolving the cross-strait stalemate.
"This might seem like a step in the wrong direction for the pan-green political camp," Chang said.
According to the pan-blue camp, the "1992 consensus" refers to an agreement on the "one China" principle, with each side having its own interpretation. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) does not acknowledge the consensus, saying the notion was fabricated in 2000 by then Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) head Su Chi (蘇起).
Beijing insists that negotiations are possible only if both sides recognize the "1992 consensus" and the "one China" principle.
The notion refers to oral statements that negotiators of the semi-official Straits Exchange Foundation and its Chinese counterpart, the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait, had issued regarding the "one China" formula at the conclusion of a meeting in Hong Kong in 1992. The DPP has denied that a consensus was reached, but suggested last October that the 1992 meeting could serve as the basis for future negotiation, indicating that the meeting was a mark of both parties' willingness to put aside political differences.
Chang said that, despite the focus that has been placed on Soong's promise to redefine the "1992 consensus," Beijing has its eye on wooing the Taiwanese audiences tuning in to live coverage of Hu and Soong's meeting.
"Beijing is using this meeting to publicize its stance on Taipei," Chang said, indicating that Beijing had put its best foot forward, giving opposition leaders high-profile receptions and repeating claims that it is committed to peace.
Chang said that Beijing has been successful in this tactic and warned that the government had to wake up to the new strategies being employed by its opponent.
Taiwan has received more than US$70 million in royalties as of the end of last year from developing the F-16V jet as countries worldwide purchase or upgrade to this popular model, government and military officials said on Saturday. Taiwan funded the development of the F-16V jet and ended up the sole investor as other countries withdrew from the program. Now the F-16V is increasingly popular and countries must pay Taiwan a percentage in royalties when they purchase new F-16V aircraft or upgrade older F-16 models. The next five years are expected to be the peak for these royalties, with Taiwan potentially earning
STAY IN YOUR LANE: As the US and Israel attack Iran, the ministry has warned China not to overstep by including Taiwanese citizens in its evacuation orders The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday rebuked a statement by China’s embassy in Israel that it would evacuate Taiwanese holders of Chinese travel documents from Israel amid the latter’s escalating conflict with Iran. Tensions have risen across the Middle East in the wake of US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran beginning Saturday. China subsequently issued an evacuation notice for its citizens. In a news release, the Chinese embassy in Israel said holders of “Taiwan compatriot permits (台胞證)” issued to Taiwanese nationals by Chinese authorities for travel to China — could register for evacuation to Egypt. In Taipei, the ministry yesterday said Taiwan
Taiwan is awaiting official notification from the US regarding the status of the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) after the US Supreme Court ruled US President Donald Trump's global tariffs unconstitutional. Speaking to reporters before a legislative hearing today, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said that Taiwan's negotiation team remains focused on ensuring that the bilateral trade deal remains intact despite the legal challenge to Trump's tariff policy. "The US has pledged to notify its trade partners once the subsequent administrative and legal processes are finalized, and that certainly includes Taiwan," Cho said when asked about opposition parties’ doubts that the ART was
If China chose to invade Taiwan tomorrow, it would only have to sever three undersea fiber-optic cable clusters to cause a data blackout, Jason Hsu (許毓仁), a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator, told a US security panel yesterday. In a Taiwan contingency, cable disruption would be one of the earliest preinvasion actions and the signal that escalation had begun, he said, adding that Taiwan’s current cable repair capabilities are insufficient. The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC) yesterday held a hearing on US-China Competition Under the Sea, with Hsu speaking on
RSS