A US security expert said yesterday US security policy regarding Taiwan has evolved dramatically over the past two years with the introduction of "strategic clarity" regarding US intentions should China attack Taiwan.
Retired Rear Admiral Michael McDevitt, now director of the Center for Strategic Studies in the US, made the comment at the Asia-Pacific Security Forum hosted by the Institute for National Policy Research in Taipei.
The forum's topic was "Global Governance in the Light of New Security Developments."
McDevitt said US President George W. Bush's comment on television to do "whatever it took to help Taiwan defend itself" was not a slip of the tongue, but a position advocated by both Bush, then a presidential candidate, and many of his senior advisors before the 2000 election.
"Strategic clarity is also involved in ensuring that Taipei un-derstands that a firm defense commitment if it was attacked did not give it a license to provoke Beijing and drag the US into conflict," McDevitt said.
But Christopher Hughes, director of the Asia Research Center at the London School of Economics, raised a question about the "strategic clarity" of US intentions if China attacks.
The US' stance on Taiwan's referendum issue has been very unclear, Hughes said, and China will expect more clarity on this issue when Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
Beijing views Taiwan's introduction of a referendum law as President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) attempt to provide a legal foundation for the country's independence, while the government here reiterated referendums are necessary steps toward a deeper democracy.
Ralph Cossa, president of the Pacific Forum Center of Strategic International Studies in Honolulu, said what the US intended to do regarding referendums is to stay out of Taiwan's politics, because it thinks any comments would probably be misinterpreted and used incorrectly by both China and Taiwan.
"That's smart politics. It's not a matter of ambiguity or clarity or anything else," Cossa said.
One of the most insightful things that was said, according to Cossa, was: "Lee Teng-hui (
"I believe the US tried to change from strategic ambiguity about China-Taiwan to strategic clarity and making it very clear to Taiwan that we will help defend the nation. But we do not support independence. The problem is Taiwan only hears what it wants to hear," Cossa said.
Cossa said there has been the perception in Washington that Chen has been waving a red flag in front of Beijing, hoping to illicit the type of reaction that would spark a nationalist reaction in Taiwan that would gain him votes in the upcoming election.
"There are some risks involved in the current activity, which could result in the US concluding that Chen is becoming a troublemaker. That would not be in Taiwan's best interest," Cossa said.
David Brown, associate director of the Asian studies department at Johns Hopkins University, said the US needs to be clear with China that the use of force is unacceptable.
"Some people have tried to describe what the Bush administration is doing right now as dual clarity. It has been clear with China: `Don't use force.' They are trying to be clear with Taiwan: `Don't change things unilaterally,'" Brown said.
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all