Badly thought out waste management policies, outlined in a petition against a planned incinerator by Miaoli County (苗栗) residents and handed in to the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) last week, are driving people to new levels of social activism.
Last Friday, about 300 Miaoli residents, accompanied by legislators and county councilors, delivered a petition to EPA Administrator Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), that expressed their opposition to a planned waste incinerator in Chunan (竹南) township.
In the petition letter, protesters said the chosen site for the incinerator is inappropriate due to its proximity to potentially inundated areas of the Chungkang River (中港溪) and to the seismically-active Touhuanping Fault (斗煥坪斷層).
Activists contend that the local government is risking the lives of residents because the incinerator would be built on a 5m-high base, making people in low-lying areas adjacent to the site more vulnerable to flooding.
Residents also questioned the necessity of the incinerator, which is designed to burn 500 tonnes of waste per day.
Based on Chunan Anti-incinerator Self-help Association's estimates, the 500 tonnes of daily waste now produced by county residents will decrease to about 300 tonnes after waste recycling, the collection of food leftovers and limits on plastic shopping bags are more fully instituted.
Lin Wen-bing (林文炳), executive-secretary of the association, said that transferring the waste to incinerators in Taichung and Hsinchu that now run below capacity would be a better solution than the construction of yet another incinerator.
In addition, association chief Lai Jing-jung (賴金榮) pointed out that the local government invited public bids for the construction of the incinerator without receiving the required agreement of representatives from the county's 18 townships.
Far from the vocal support they were seeking, what residents heard from EPA head Hau last Friday was a promise to press local government officials to reconsider their position and review procedures for inviting bids.
The frustrated residents then turned to the Miaoli County Government, expressing their opposition by displaying banners and handing the petition to county officials.
"If the government delivers a bid without communicating with residents first, we will file a lawsuit against officials involved with administrative neglect," Lai said.
In addition, protestors said it was ironic that the county government plans to demand that its 18 township offices accept the byproducts of the incinerator -- bottom ash and toxic fly ash.
Huang Hung-chang (
"Building the incinerator is essential to solving the looming garbage crisis," Huang said, "And we still have plans to build a final repository for bottom ash and fly ash."
Chen Jian-zhi (陳建志), director of the waste policy committee of the Green Citizens' Action Alliance, told the Taipei Times that the Chunan incinerator was just one of Taiwan's many ill-considered waste-management policies.
Based on the alliance's vast experience in this area, Chen said that residents, regardless of location, generally oppose incinerators for the same reasons, including: lack of waste to burn, ill-advised site selection, the poor management of bottom ash and fly ash and a questionable decision-making process.
In addition, Chen sid that local governments carrying out build-operate-transfer (BOT) or build-operate-own (BOO) incinerator projects all face a common dillema -- no place to dump the by-products of waste incineration.
"When the Miaoli County government demands 18 township offices take the residue back, it is actually shirking its responsibility," Chen said.
Many cases involving the illegal dumping of bottom ash and fly ash, Chen said, could be attributed to the lack of qualified final repositories. According to Chen, Tungshih (東勢) township in Taichung County dumps the hazardous waste on the riverbed of the Tachia River (大甲溪).
Chen said, however, that the dilemma could be attributed the EPA's failure to expeditiously establish policies to deal with the large amount of bottom ash and fly ash being produced by the nation's incinerators.
After all, on the basis of EPA's original estimates in during the 1990s, Taiwan's 36 incinerators would have been capable of burning 30,400 tons of municipal solid waste per day by the end of next year.
Environmentalists say they regret the fact that the nation's waste management policy hasn't followed changes in Taiwanese society. The unexpected success of waste recycling programs, for example, has led to a fact that there isn't enough garbage to burn in the existing incinerators.
In March, the EPA announced that four BOO/BOT incinerator projects would be abandoned due to pressure from local residents. Although the change in policy cuts the total capacity for treating waste by 3,250 tons per day, activists said, strategies that are in accord with social changes should be ongoing.
Activists said that last year, Taiwan generated only 20,000 tons of household waste per day. Even with this, all operating and planned incinerators leave 7,150 tons of unused capacity, which often results in the illegal burning of hazardous industrial waste.
By observing the flourishing community-based anti-incinerator movement, some of the more aggressive elements of the movement now believe they have the political strength to push for a more thorough revision of Taiwan's waste management policies.
"Even thought local differences do exist, the hope of stopping the construction of unnecessary incinerators is the same," Chen said. "The integration of anti-incinerator groups will force the government to review its out-of-date waste management policies.
Chen said that anti-incinerator groups in southern Taiwan had built a network to support one another and that the network was expanding into the rest of the country.
George Cheng (
By working with the US-based Global Anti-Incinerator Alliance, an international alliance of individuals, academics, non-governmental organizationsand others working to end waste incineration, Taiwan Watch offers many local anti-incinerator groups updated information and strategies.
"What we want is to highlight that the problems caused by incinerators are global and deserve more attention," Cheng said.
Next month, Taiwan Watch will issue a report on Taiwan's anti-incinerator movement at an environmental forum held in Tokyo and exchange opinions with their counterparts in Japan, a country regarded by others as incinerator-friendly.
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all