Taipei Times (TT): When did you begin to focus on this issue?
Hodgkinson: In terms of formally having some involvement with this issue, I think maybe it was sometime back in 1992 when the Center for Capital Punishment Studies was established.
PHOTO: CHIANG YING-YING, TAIPEI TIMES
TT: What inspired you to devote yourself to study this subject? What was your previous experience relating to death penalty?
Hodgkinson: I was curious that, in the UK, we do not have the death penalty; but in Texas there is a death penalty. I was curious about the way they did it in England and what they did in Texas. Why is it that there is a death penalty? I just couldn't understand why. Then I began to get more interested in this issue at a theoretical level.
I am a frequent contributor to the British and foreign press. Prior to joining the [Westminster] university in 1989, I had worked for the Inner London Probation Service for 15 years where I developed expertise on offenders serving life sentences and those with mental disorders. I'm also an adviser on the death penalty to the Council of Europe and a member of the British Foreign Secretary's Death Penalty Panel.
TT: What does the Center for Capital Punishment Studies do?
Hodgkinson: The Center for Capital Punishment Studies is under the School of Law at the university and was established in 1992. It is regularly consulted by the media and others researching the death penalty. The center also has a library specializing in death-penalty issues, which is open to all with a scholarly interest in the subject.
TT: Do you think it's fair for the public to pay taxes to keep criminals alive in prison once the death penalty is replaced by a reviewable life sentence?
Hodgkinson: I think we really cannot get rid of our responsibilities when things go wrong. When a person commits crimes that may result in the death penalty, it will be a sign that there is something wrong with the person's family, education and society. Simply executing a serial killer does not really solve the problems caused by what he did or the problems which made him do so.
In the US, a death penalty case can cost taxpayers US$2.5 million to US$3.5 million from trial to execution. For a prisoner who has been detained for 40 years, it costs approximately US$400,000. So a reviewable life sentence is actually cheaper than the death penalty.
But the real problem is way beyond that. Why do we spend so much money to execute somebody? And even when it is time to execute the criminal, does this person really regret what she or he has done? Does it work? It would not be a smart move to put somebody in an electric chair with so much money if this person never really regrets.
TT: In your research, did you find that the state encourages criminals once there is no death penalty?
Hodgkinson: I do not have evidence for this. But just restrict your thinking to the facts of murder and homicide. In regions without the death penalty, these kinds of cases are actually not as numerous as in regions with the death penalty.
In the Philippines, there are 21 offences which can end up with the death penalty. However, as far as we can see, the crime rate there did not drop a bit because of these strict laws.
TT: What problems are faced in replacing the death penalty with reviewable life sentences?
Hodgkinson: First of all, the government must carry out a well-organized plan for replacing death penalty. It doesn't have to be a reviewable life sentence, but it has to be a sufficient penalty to "educate" the criminals.
Second, how does the government persuade the public that our society is still a safe place once the death penalty is gone.
Political issues can be an obstacle to the process of making the death penalty disappear. For instance, the way they did it in South Africa was to ask the grand justices to "announce" it through its Council of the Grand Justices. Once the grand justices said that death penalty was actually against human rights and the Constitution and should be replaced, politicians could simply support it and make it happen. They did not have to worry about their own political careers being objected to by those who were pro-death penalty because it was the grand justices' interpretation of the Constitution. It was the law and they were just following it.
TT: Officials from the Ministry of Justice say that, rather than replace the death penalty, they will let judges make their own decisions and will trust their decision on whether a criminal should be sentenced to death. In other words, judges will not sentence somebody to death that easily, according to the ministry's new policy. Do you regard this as progress? What is your view toward Taiwan's efforts on this issue?
Hodgkinson: If it's a transition method, I think it's a good thing. But on the whole, I think it is very dangerous to do so because judges will have too much power if this is the case.
It's my understanding that the Ministry of Justice established the Association for Protection of Victims of Criminal Acts (
Editorial: The death penalty must be killed
Taiwan is to receive the first batch of Lockheed Martin F-16 Block 70 jets from the US late this month, a defense official said yesterday, after a year-long delay due to a logjam in US arms deliveries. Completing the NT$247.2 billion (US$7.69 billion) arms deal for 66 jets would make Taiwan the third nation in the world to receive factory-fresh advanced fighter jets of the same make and model, following Bahrain and Slovakia, the official said on condition of anonymity. F-16 Block 70/72 are newly manufactured F-16 jets built by Lockheed Martin to the standards of the F-16V upgrade package. Republic of China
Taiwan-Japan Travel Passes are available for use on public transit networks in the two countries, Taoyuan Metro Corp said yesterday, adding that discounts of up to 7 percent are available. Taoyuan Metro, the Taipei MRT and Japan’s Keisei Electric Railway teamed up to develop the pass. Taoyuan Metro operates the Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport MRT Line, while Keisei Electric Railway offers express services between Tokyo’s Narita Airport, and the Keisei Ueno and Nippori stations in the Japanese capital, as well as between Narita and Haneda airports. The basic package comprises one one-way ticket on the Taoyuan MRT Line and one Skyliner ticket on
A new tropical storm formed late yesterday near Guam and is to approach closest to Taiwan on Thursday, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) said. Tropical Storm Pulasan became the 14th named storm of the year at 9:25pm yesterday, the agency said. As of 8am today, it was near Guam traveling northwest at 21kph, it said. The storm’s structure is relatively loose and conditions for strengthening are limited, WeatherRisk analyst Wu Sheng-yu (吳聖宇) said on Facebook. Its path is likely to be similar to Typhoon Bebinca, which passed north of Taiwan over Japan’s Ryukyu Islands and made landfall in Shanghai this morning, he said. However, it
Starlux Airlines, Taiwan’s newest international carrier, has announced it would apply to join the Oneworld global airline alliance before the end of next year. In an investor conference on Monday, Starlux Airlines chief executive officer Glenn Chai (翟健華) said joining the alliance would help it access Taiwan. Chai said that if accepted, Starlux would work with other airlines in the alliance on flight schedules, passenger transits and frequent flyer programs. The Oneworld alliance has 13 members, including American Airlines, British Airways, Cathay Pacific and Qantas, and serves more than 900 destinations in 170 territories. Joining Oneworld would also help boost