Thu, Oct 25, 2012 - Page 19 News List

War of words over Armstrong escalates

DOPING FALLOUT:The UCI said that the USADA should have let an independent body investigate, and the USADA said the UCI tried to bury the matter and evade responsibility


A day after Lance Armstrong was stripped of his seven Tour de France titles and banned for life, the war of words between the International Cycling Union (UCI) and the US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) escalated.

Though Armstrong’s exposure as a drug cheat was effectively sealed when the UCI on Monday ratified USADA’s sanctions against the American, the two bodies have been quick to hurl accusations and critiques at one another.

UCI president Pat McQuaid conceded cycling was in crisis at a news conference on Monday, but he has since called into question USADA’s evidence and methods while raising grounds for a possible appeal by Armstrong.

In a “Decision” document posted on UCI’s Web site and signed by McQuaid, the USADA’s report was said to have included “animated or overstated language,” as well as “incorrect and incomplete statements.”

“It would have been better that the evidence collected by USADA had been assessed by a neutral body or person who was not involved in collecting the evidence and prosecuting the defendant,” the document said.

“This would have avoided both the criticism of [a] witch hunt against Mr Armstrong and the criticism that the UCI had a conflict of interest,” it said.

USADA chief executive Travis Tygart, who on Monday had called for a full and independent investigation into professional cycling, has since heaped further blame on UCI.

“The truth is Lance Armstrong, on their watch, pulled off the greatest heist sport has ever seen,” Tygart said in an e-mail to the Guardian newspaper. “Instead of attempting to explain or justify their inadequacies, the UCI should acknowledge their responsibility and failures and find ways to make it right.”

In response to UCI’s suggestion that USADA should have handed over its case file for an independent body to open disciplinary proceedings, Tygart said: “We set forth our position on why they were conflicted in this case on many different grounds. They accepted money from him [Armstrong], they accused us of a witch-hunt [without seeing any evidence], they sued the chief whistleblower, they discouraged witnesses from participating. They simply are trying to divert attention away from their own failures in this whole sad saga, and those that love the sport of cycling and clean sport should not allow that to happen.”

Armstrong, 41, had previously elected not to contest USADA charges, prompting USADA to propose his punishment pending confirmation from cycling’s world governing body.

Former Armstrong teammates at his US Postal and Discovery Channel outfits, where he won his seven successive Tour titles from 1999 to 2005, testified against him and themselves and were given reduced bans by the US authorities.

McQuaid, who has been widely criticized for his and the UCI’s handling of the Armstrong affair, was lambasted by World Anti-Doping Agency chief John Fahey earlier on Tuesday.

“Looking back, clearly the doping was widespread,” Fahey told Fox Sports. “If that doping was widespread, then the question is legitimately put: Who was stopping it? Who was working against it? Why wasn’t it stopped?”

Fahey said the UCI had to “take the blinkers off” while asking a range of pertinent questions.

“Look at the past, examine the people who are there, ask themselves the questions: ‘Are those same people still in the sport and can they proceed forward with those people remaining?’ I don’t think there’s any credibility if they don’t do that. I think they need to get confidence back into the sport so that its millions of supporters around the world will watch and support the sport going forward,” Fahey added.

This story has been viewed 1515 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top