TT: What future do you see for cross-strait relations once the two sides enter the WTO?
Shi Hwei-yow (許惠祐): The two sides will be entering a global organization covering a range of economic issues, such as trade, taxes, services, and intellectual property. The shipping industry is not a concern of the WTO, but the two sides will probably have no choice but to discuss the issue as it relates to exchanges involving other industries. The fundamental issues will be easier to discuss if the two sides resolve certain issues within the WTO framework. There might be possibilities for discussing direct transportation links.
TAIPEI TIMES FILE PHOTO
It's too early to talk about what the WTO can do for the two sides. But if the public believes that economic issues are more important than political issues, especially in this sluggish economy, I believe that the political issues will fade away. Taiwan's public will tire of the so called "one China" principle or the "1992 consensus," if these have no positive impact on their lives.
TT: What's your understanding of the so-called "1992 consensus?"
Shi: The "1992 consensus" is not an appropriate term of reference for the discussion of cross-strait affairs. Su-Chi (蘇起) coined the phrase last year in an attempt to find common ground between China and Taiwan. He didn't, however, define it any further. Somebody else then defined it as "one China, with each side having its own interpretation." Then somebody else defined it as the "one China principle." There is a wide gap between the two.
China's "one China principle" means that there is only one China, Taiwan is part of China, and China's territory is indivisible; the PRC is the only China.
Su Chi wanted to establish as much room as possible to get the two sides back to the negotiating table, but he didn't define the "1992 consensus," which was unhelpful and simply caused further conflict.
TT: How do you view the disputes caused by the "1992 consensus" between the current government and the opposition parties?
Shi: The opposition must explain the issue clearly, such as what China has done to us with the "one China" principle.
China has kept changing its position on the so-called "consensus." What is there for the government to recognize?
When the DPP was in opposition, it attacked both Taiwan's government and China, but the current opposition parties simply demand that the government recognize the "1992 consensus."
Our political parties should work to produce a common foreign policy. Let's have sensible debate. The national interest should be above party interests.
TT: How will the SEF assist Taiwanese businessmen investing in China after WTO entry?
Shi: We have solved many problems for them, such as military service issues for their children.
We are currently working on further opening the "small three-links," including allowing Taiwanese businessmen to travel to China from Kinmen (
TT: Will the ban on Chinese citizens visiting Taiwan be lifted soon?
Shi: I am lukewarm on the policy. What are we really hoping to gain by allowing Chinese to visit Taiwan? "Generating revenue" is just a slogan used by certain politicians. How much money can we make from them? We currently allow Chinese businessmen to visit upon application. Would this be fair, if we allowed tourists to do so without application? Moreover, we need to see how much we will need to spend to upgrade security. I doubt whether Chinese visitors can stimulate Taiwan's economy.
TT: Is there any chance of Taiwan and China resuming negotiations ? Do you think China wants to negotiate given that Hong Kong newspapers and some non-government groups have quoted China as saying that "the PRC and the ROC are both China?"
Shi: China's desire to negotiate and its refusal to do so are both part of its strategy. Mao Zedong (毛澤東) said that negotiating is a strategy and not negotiating is also a strategy.
The Chinese authorities make different remarks when they receive different Taiwanese visitors. We should not view those remarks too seriously. I will take what they said seriously if Jiang or another official made the remark, "the PRC and the ROC are both China," at the UN. There are many facets to the question of whether there will be negotiations, and its too early to tell.
NO-LIMITS PARTNERSHIP: ‘The bottom line’ is that if the US were to have a conflict with China or Russia it would likely open up a second front with the other, a US senator said Beijing and Moscow could cooperate in a conflict over Taiwan, the top US intelligence chief told the US Senate this week. “We see China and Russia, for the first time, exercising together in relation to Taiwan and recognizing that this is a place where China definitely wants Russia to be working with them, and we see no reason why they wouldn’t,” US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a US Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing on Thursday. US Senator Mike Rounds asked Haines about such a potential scenario. He also asked US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse
INSPIRING: Taiwan has been a model in the Asia-Pacific region with its democratic transition, free and fair elections and open society, the vice president-elect said Taiwan can play a leadership role in the Asia-Pacific region, vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) told a forum in Taipei yesterday, highlighting the nation’s resilience in the face of geopolitical challenges. “Not only can Taiwan help, but Taiwan can lead ... not only can Taiwan play a leadership role, but Taiwan’s leadership is important to the world,” Hsiao told the annual forum hosted by the Center for Asia-Pacific Resilience and Innovation think tank. Hsiao thanked Taiwan’s international friends for their long-term support, citing the example of US President Joe Biden last month signing into law a bill to provide aid to Taiwan,
China’s intrusive and territorial claims in the Indo-Pacific region are “illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive,” new US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo said on Friday, adding that he would continue working with allies and partners to keep the area free and open. Paparo made the remarks at a change-of-command ceremony at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii, where he took over the command from Admiral John Aquilino. “Our world faces a complex problem set in the troubling actions of the People’s Republic of China [PRC] and its rapid buildup of forces. We must be ready to answer the PRC’s increasingly intrusive and
STATE OF THE NATION: The legislature should invite the president to deliver an address every year, the TPP said, adding that Lai should also have to answer legislators’ questions The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday proposed inviting president-elect William Lai (賴清德) to make a historic first state of the nation address at the legislature following his inauguration on May 20. Lai is expected to face many domestic and international challenges, and should clarify his intended policies with the public’s representatives, KMT caucus secretary-general Hung Meng-kai (洪孟楷) said when making the proposal at a meeting of the legislature’s Procedure Committee. The committee voted to add the item to the agenda for Friday, along with another similar proposal put forward by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). The invitation is in line with Article 15-2