Taipei Times: Can you briefly talk about your meeting with President Chen (陳水扁)?
Hans van Baalen: I had a one-hour discussion with your president ... We debated the Liberal International and [this year's] Prize for Freedom because we must find a place where we can physically give the award to the president. There are some hurdles to overcome ... we need to arrange a visa for the president to receive the prize in an EU country.
Another thing was cross-strait relations, [including] one-China policy or independence of Taiwan, and the relationship with China. The third item was the relationship with the EU, the US, and also the WTO. And we also talked about the elections of Dec. 1.
PHOTO: CHEN CHENG-CHANG, TAIPEI TIMES
TT: As you know, the Danish government made it very clear earlier this month that it would not grant Chen a visa to facilitate his trip to Denmark to receive the award. What's the main reason for Denmark's refusal?
Van Baalen: I speak now as the vice president of Liberal International, although I am also a member of the Dutch parliament.
We deplore the fact that the president was denied a visa for Denmark.
The Danish government referred to the EU's unofficial rule, which stated that the five most important political figures of the ROC, including the president, vice president, premier, foreign minister, and defense minister, would not get a visa even [if] they apply for private reasons. This is a thing we deplore very much because it is a human right to travel, and they are elected by the people, at least the president and the vice president are directly elected by the people.
So I think they should be able to travel, just as the US has issued a visa to the president recently when he was going to Latin America.
We would like the EU to adopt a line common to that of the US.
I myself have tabled, as a European affairs spokesman in parliament, questions to the Dutch government, and the Dutch government [is] also concerned [about] that EU line. This is something we deplore.
As Liberal International, we can lobby, we can speak out -- like I am doing now -- we can put pressure on our government, but we have no ability to issue a visa ourselves.
But I have promised President Chen to do my utmost to make it possible that we find options inside the EU. That means options other than Denmark.
TT: Will your country, Holland, become a possible destination for Chen to receive the award?
Van Baalen: Unhappily, no. I asked this question in parliament on July 5, which was the day before recess. The minister of foreign affairs, in a letter dated July 19, replied that the Dutch government [would] stick to the European line.
But you know there are differences in opinion inside the EU on that line. So I do not know what other governments will say. But we are exploring the options.
TT: As of now, what's the latest development in your exploration?
Van Baalen: Let me be clear on this. This is a matter on which I can't give you the information because it's by silent diplomacy. If tomorrow I said that country X, Y or Z is thinking of giving a visa [to Chen], you know what would happen.
So we would talk with governments and talk with members of parliament.
We have good relations with the European Parliament, in which the Liberals have tabled questions to the commissioner in charge of external relations, Chris Patten. We will explore other options.
TT: Who are the European Parliament members that have tabled related questions to Patten?
Van Baalen: Graham Watson, a member of the European Parliament for the Liberals.
TT: Is Liberal International's main goal to find an EU country that will grant Chen a visa and to allow him to receive the award?
Van Baalen: We've decided to award the 2001 Prize for Freedom to President Chen. And we are supportive of finding a place inside the EU where Chen can be awarded the prize in person. I think your foreign ministry can help us toward that end. We will do what we can.
TT: What if at the end of the day none of the EU countries are willing to grant Chen a visa?
Van Baalen: We must look into that option if and when it occurs.
TT: During your recent meeting with China's official in charge of Taiwan affairs, Mingwei Zhou (
Van Baalen: I told him that Liberal International decides to whom it will give the freedom prize. That's our business.
We saw Chen as a human-rights fighter, as a man of democracy, and we wanted to honor him for that. The Chinese did not comment on that because I stated indirectly that it's our business, not theirs.
And I did not discuss it further because it's not something between us and Beijing.
TT: In your view, how will the award, once formally given to Chen, show the world that here we have an elected president but whose physical movement has been hindered because of pressure from China?
Van Baalen: The fact is President Chen, like Vice President [Annette] Lu (呂秀蓮), were both in prison for their democratic convictions.
Today they are democratically elected president and vice president, and they are in prison again. They are now imprisoned in their own country. That's not acceptable.
When I spoke with the PRC as the vice president of Liberal International, I didn't speak about institutional matters concerning the political status of Taiwan -- I spoke about the human right to travel.
So I told them not to link the right to travel for President Chen and Vice President Lu to any institutional dealing.
It is a human right to travel. Therefore, President Chen should have the opportunity to receive in person the freedom prize of Liberal International.
Of course that will mark his achievement, and it will also mark the achievement of democracy on Taiwan soil.
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
REGIONAL STABILITY: Taipei thanked the Biden administration for authorizing its 16th sale of military goods and services to uphold Taiwan’s defense and safety The US Department of State has approved the sale of US$228 million of military goods and services to Taiwan, the US Department of Defense said on Monday. The state department “made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale” to the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US for “return, repair and reshipment of spare parts and related equipment,” the defense department’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency said in a news release. Taiwan had requested the purchase of items and services which include the “return, repair and reshipment of classified and unclassified spare parts for aircraft and related equipment; US Government
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from