Over the past two weeks, military commanders have been striving to teach servicemen how to answer the simple question "for whom and for what should they fight?"
The answers prepared for the questions are: the servicemen should fight for the people of the country and the survival of the country.
PHOTO: SHING TING-WEI, TAIPEI TIMES
Simple questions and simple answers.
But what is the point of asking servicemen to answer such basic questions? Does the military leadership sense that a crisis of belief is taking hold or already ensconced?
The questions "for whom and for what should servicemen fight?" were first raised by President Chen Shui-bian (
But many servicemen, especially career officers, have become increasingly confused in recent years about what they are fighting for given that increasing numbers of Taiwanese are flocking to China seeking business opportunities, said an army colonel, who declined to be identified.
"A lot of us are unsure whether the Chinese are our friends or our enemies. This is becoming more confusing as we consider the fact that quite a few military officials in recent years have chosen to work and live in China after retirement," the colonel said.
"The transfer of power from the KMT to the DPP last year was another factor that has contributed to this crisis of belief in the military. We [the military] have condemned the promotion of Taiwanese independence by the DPP for several decades, but now they are our masters," he said.
"During the rule of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), the military knew very well for who they were fighting for -- for the nation's leader. They also knew for what they were fighting -- for the recovery of the mainland lost to the communists in the 1949 civil war," he said.
These views are not shared by Ministry of National Defense spokesman Major General Huang Shui-sheng (
"We have no doubt about for whom and for what we should fight. Chief of the General Staff General Tang has been teaching this idea to servicemen since the transfer of power last year," Huang said.
Andrew Yang (楊念祖), secretary-general of the Chinese Council of Advanced Policy Studies, said there are reasons for the president and the chief of the general staff to preach the idea of for whom and for what the servicemen should fight.
"Over the past year, the political situation in the country has been unstable. This has also affected people in the military. President Chen recently highlighted the idea of for whom and for what servicemen should fight mainly to keep military personnel firm and steady in their belief in the country," Yang said.
Chang Bai-ta (
"The military used to be strongly against the idea of Taiwanese independence. If they feel they have a crisis of belief now because of the leadership of a pro-independence party, they ought to learn more about democracy," Chang said.
"In a democratic country, all sorts of opinions have to be accepted. Military education used to lack this form of democratic instruction. It is one of the reasons why some people in the military are getting confused about who and what they should fight for."
Under KMT rule, military education focused on denying even the existence of a pro-independence movement.
Some see the fact that the military has dropped Taiwanese independence as an issue of discussion is a sign that it now accepts the democratic transfer of power and has made some of the necessary changes in philosophy.
But Chang and others aren't so sure. Many still fear that military silence is merely an attempt to escape discussion of an issue with which it is deeply uncomfortable .
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
CHINA POLICY: At the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China, the two sides issued strong support for Taiwan and condemned China’s actions in the South China Sea The US and EU issued a joint statement on Wednesday supporting Taiwan’s international participation, notably omitting the “one China” policy in a departure from previous similar statements, following high-level talks on China and the Indo-Pacific region. The statement also urged China to show restraint in the Taiwan Strait. US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and European External Action Service Secretary-General Stefano Sannino cochaired the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China and the sixth US-EU Indo-Pacific Consultations from Monday to Tuesday. Since the Indo-Pacific consultations were launched in 2021, references to the “one China” policy have appeared in every statement apart from the
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from