After Vivi's death, her sister and friends created a Web page in memory of her. Now the Web page has become a discussion forum where people have been engaging in intense debate over whether the life sentence imposed on the 20-year-old girl's murderer was too lenient.
Chang Ya-ling (張雅玲), or "Vivi" as her sisters and friends called her, had her life taken by stalker Wang Hung-wei (王鴻偉), 25, on Sept. 26 last year. That morning Wang drove his white Mercedes car into Vivi, knocking her unconscious as she left her home in Tamshui for work. He then put her into the trunk of his car and drove off after which he attacked her twice, inflicting 176 slashes with a watermelon knife before abandoning her body in a vacant lot, the court judgement says.
Wang was promptly arrested on the day of Vivi's death. The prosecution charged him in November with murder and requested that he be sentenced to death in view of the brutality of the crime. But the Shihlin District Court on May 22 sentenced Wang to life imprisonment.
PHOTO: CHIANG YING-YING, TAIPEI TIMES
More lenient than expected, the sentence upset the victim's grieving family. An e-mail written by Jennifer Chang (
"Does one deserve 176 cuts for rejecting someone's advances?" the victim's sister, a 23-year-old employee of a securities firm in Taipei, asked in the title of the letter.
In the widely forwarded e-mail, the broken-hearted sister said that her family was not demanding that the murderer necessarily be sentenced to death. "We just want the truth ... Don't let my sister die without having her soul comforted."
According to Taiwan's criminal code, a murder offense is punishable by death, imprisonment for life or for not less than 10 years.
Shihlin District Court judge Hsu Yung-huang (
Wang reached an agreement with Vivi's family whereby he will pay NT$8.6 million in compensation to the Changs.
All this demonstrated that the accused was repentant and was willing to make amends for his deed and therefore should be given a chance to reform himself, the judgement said.
But Vivi's family cannot accept this. "Someone that has told the truth may be remorseful," Jennifer Chang said in an interview with the Taipei Times, "but Wang Hung-wei kept lying all along."
During the trial, Wang claimed that he wanted to drive Vivi to work on the morning of her death but he hit her with his car by accident after she refused his offer. He said that he then put her into the trunk of his car to take her to hospital but when, on the way, he opened the trunk to check on Vivi, she took a watermelon chopper to attack him so he grabbed the knife, slashing Vivi in self-defense. He then closed the trunk and continued to drive before stopping a second time and opening the trunk again, at which Vivi again resisted him so he slashed her once more, Wang said.
Taking into account the postmortem report and the testimonies from witnesses, the court denied Wang's claim that he had hit Vivi by accident and had cut her in self-defense.
Sentence too light
In the opinion of the victim's family, this position of the court was inconsistent with the sentence it handed down.
"But why did the court still say that such a liar was remorseful?" Jennifer Chang said. "His confession kept changing from one court hearing to another. All he did was try to escape responsibility."
Furthermore, the victim's family suspect Wang had accomplices but they have no evidence of this.
Even at the end of the final hearing when the judge asked Wang if he had anything further to say, according to Jennifer Chang, "he was completely expressionless when he turned to us and said he was very sorry."
She said that the compensation agreement was also a lie, and that Wang's family paid only NT$2.6 million.
"Does this mean that somebody who is powerful and rich can mix up right and wrong and escape the punishment he deserves?" she said.
Media reports at the time of the murder also said that Wang showed indifference to the whole matter when being held at a police station as a suspect. Wang is the son of the head of a construction firm in Tamshui and was brought up in an affluent environment, reports said.
In her e-mail, Jennifer Chang asked people who received it to forward it to as many friends as possible.
"Perhaps you or your friends could help us seek justice. We also hope that the case will draw more public attention so the judiciary will deliver the justice we deserve," she wrote.
Though she did not specify what kind of help she sought, the touching e-mail brought many visitors to Vivi's memorial Web site, which was created a month after her death.
The Web site contains memorial articles, photos of Vivi, stories about her and a message board. Jennifer Chang said she wished Vivi could see the Web site and know how much her family and friends miss her.
It was a rather quiet site visited only by those who were close to Vivi and her family until she sent out the e-mail late last month following the court's judgement.
Now all kinds of messages appear on the Web site. Most of the messages are condemnations of the criminal with demands that Wang must pay for his crime with his life attached.
"Why give him [Wang] a chance? Anyone who kills people should pay with his life! Did he [Wang] give the victim a chance before she died?" wrote a person who signed her name as "Cathy," one of many to hold this view.
In contrast, few comments against the death penalty have appeared on the Web site and those that have been posted have all been followed by a string of criticism.
Moreover, many of the messages are marked with emotion. Some visitors to the site, for example, discussed what kinds of torture and execution they wanted Wang to suffer, while some went to great lengths to try and find a word that showed their contempt for the murderer.
What is perhaps most notable regarding the views expressed in the online exchanges is that almost everyone who holds that the murderer must die mentions the idea of retribution, while little is said about capital punishment as a deterrent.
Hearing society
This represents a common view and suggests that Minister of Justice Chen Ding-nan's (
In a press conference marking his first year in office last month, Chen expressed his stance in favor of abolishing the death penalty. Noting that a high percentage of people in Taiwan still supported the death penalty, he repeatedly stressed that his ministry's priority over the issue was to educate people to think that "the death penalty as a deterrent against crime has been proven ineffective," and that "the death penalty is not a panacea to crime." However, many believe that in his desire to abolish the death penalty, the minister has failed to address the issue of retribution.
The life sentence has been appealed by both sides. Asked whether her family could accept it if Wang told the High Court the whole truth and were still sentenced to life imprisonment, Jennifer Chang told the Taipei Times, "as long as he told the truth and truly repented, yes."
However, she also said that capital punishment is what Wang justly deserves.
Nine months after the tragedy, Vivi's sister remains calm when describing how one chop to her sister's neck almost severed her head from her body.
"I'd never thought about the issue of abolishing the death penalty until Vivi died. Now we understand the fear and helplessness felt by a victim's family.
"Some people tried to comfort me saying that a life sentence is already the second severest penalty and that even a death penalty for Wang would not bring back my sister. However, the current prison system does not make us feel safe."
She said she believes that prisons fail to reform offenders and that parole is too easily awarded.
"The brutal Wang Hung-wei could be granted parole in 10 years or more ... I feel it is terrible that such a dangerous person could walk freely in society."
Under the current system, a prisoner serving a life sentence has the opportunity of being granted parole after spending 15 years in jail. Until 1997, parole could be obtained after serving as little as 10 years of a life sentence.
There were no ready statistics showing how many years life prisoners spend on average in jail before receiving parole, a senior official at the justice ministry's corrections department said.
But according to the official, inmates serve 12 years or more of a life sentence before being granted parole, since the new 15-year minimum came into effect less than four years ago. The law was not made retroactive.
When asked, Jennifer Chang said that her family would be more relieved if her sister's murderer were executed.
She agrees in principle to a "life sentence without parole" as long as certain conditions are met.
"I would agree if prisoners had to work for their living. But I wouldn't if they don't have to work, but simply live off taxpayers' money."
Still, she hesitated and said, "I don't know whether it's because I am a family member of a [murder] victim, but actually I agree more with `an eye for an eye.'"
Although she is uncertain what she should do next, after the tragedy faded out of the media's limelight, Vivi's sister used a unique way to let people know what it is like to be part of a family that has suffered such great pain and hopes that this will help bring a more just conclusion.
"We're not trying to pressure the court into handing down a particular sentence. We just hope more people will show greater concern about the case so that the court will handle it more carefully," she said.
Vivi's Web site:
http://vivi.eadplus.com/index.htm
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
CHINA POLICY: At the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China, the two sides issued strong support for Taiwan and condemned China’s actions in the South China Sea The US and EU issued a joint statement on Wednesday supporting Taiwan’s international participation, notably omitting the “one China” policy in a departure from previous similar statements, following high-level talks on China and the Indo-Pacific region. The statement also urged China to show restraint in the Taiwan Strait. US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and European External Action Service Secretary-General Stefano Sannino cochaired the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China and the sixth US-EU Indo-Pacific Consultations from Monday to Tuesday. Since the Indo-Pacific consultations were launched in 2021, references to the “one China” policy have appeared in every statement apart from the
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from