In the wake of Chinese hijacker Gao Jun (
However, Lai Hsieh-yi (
PHOTO: CHIANG YING-YING, TAIPEI TIMES
"They [the MOJ and the prison] won't let him go back because he's such a troublemaker," he said.
Gao Jun was one of 16 Chinese who hijacked 12 Chinese domestic flights to Taiwan seeking political asylum in a so-called "hijacking fever" that occurred between April 1993 and June 1994. Armed only with a scalpel, Gao single-handedly hijacked a Chinese Northern Airlines MD-82 jet on a Qingdao to Fuzhou flight on Dec. 8, 1993.
After serving over two-thirds of his 10-year sentence, Gao was paroled on Feb. 19 and was sent to the Hsinchu refugee camp, where he was put on probation to await repatriation to China.
As soon as Gao arrived at the refugee camp he started a hunger strike -- the purpose of which was not clear, Lai said.
"He wants to draw attention and distinguish himself by not cooperating. He used to refuse repatriation; now he says he wants to go back [to China] soon. But I wonder if, when we're to send him back, he might resist again," Lai said.
Citing the concern that Gao's mood might be disturbed, Lai declined a request by the Taipei Times to interview the hijacker, but allowed reporters to see him outside the railings of his cell. Inmates typically live together in large bunk dormitories and are only placed in single-person cells as a security measure or for punishment when they break certain regulations.
Gao looked sane and well. Knowing there was a photographer outside, he sat or stood with his back constantly to the door. When Lai reproached him for not eating, he replied, "I said I don't eat; I just don't."
Gao's hunger strike has now moved into its 15th day, and the refugee camp today plans to have him force-fed by doctors for a third time.
Lai said Gao continues to resist every instruction and knocks over his food tray at meals.
Gao is the last of the 16 hijackers to receive parole and to be transferred to the Hsinchu refugee camp. However, he is by no means the only hijacker to have given camp officials a hard time.
As Gao's probation officer, Lai said it is his duty to report Gao's breach of the conduct rules to the MOJ via the Bureau of Immigration and suggest that Gao's parole be revoked. But Lai said he had tried such a move with another hijacker and failed.
In July 1999, hijacker Qi Dachuan
It has been widely reported by the media that the hijackers have caused significant trouble while in prison. For example, Gao is reported to have swallowed toothbrushes and a thermometer. Hunger strikes, riots and fights in the prison were also frequently reported.
"It is understandable that the prison wants them to stay here until repatriation," Lai said.
The most notable and shocking act of the hijackers took place on Feb. 8, 1999, when three of them repeated the crime. On their pre-repatriation flight from Hsinchu to Kinmen with six other hijackers, Yang Mingde (楊明德), Lin Wenqiang (林文強) and Wang Zhihua (王志華) injured Jan Jyh-horng (詹志宏), deputy secretary general of the Straits Exchange Foundation, with a sharp iron weapon and demanded that the plane be flown to Guam.
The attempt failed and the trio were brought back to Taiwan and convicted of hijacking a second time. They are now in the process of appeals.
Several officials were disciplined over the incident, including the refugee camp director, who was replaced because he was deemed to have been negligent in failing to prevent the trio from making the weapon and taking it on board the plane.
The state watchdog Control Yuan also formally condemned the National Police Administration and demanded the refugee camp enhance the management of hijackers being held on probation.
The reasons for hijackers' inclination to be emotionally frustrated are multifold, successive directors of the refugee camp have said.
First, unlike other inmates, most of whom are illegal immigrants, the hijackers will still face further trials and harsh punishments after they go back to China.
It was reported that the first repatriated Chinese hijacker, Huang Shugang (
Former camp directors also said that by escaping China the hijackers expected to receive a hero's treatment in Taiwan, as was the case for their counterparts during the Cold War era. However, the change of history put them instead behind bars, and they found the reality hard to accept.
Besides, Lai said, some hijackers see themselves as superior to ordinary illegal immigrants. "They regard themselves as coming to Taiwan with a brave act and a political belief and they believe they are different from others who came here on boats just to get a job," Lai said.
"Therefore, some of them don't get along very well with other inmates."
As Lai gave the Taipei Times reporters a tour of a secure zone dormitory, an inmate shouted: "Sir! Someone hit me!"
The man who shouted was Han Shuxue (
Han was sentenced to 11 years and was paroled and sent to the refugee camp in February 1999. Li has already been sent back to China. Lai said Han has been noisy for more than a month this time.
"He has been very fussy and likes to make complaints against camp staff and other inmates," Lai said, "However, his situation is not very serious and what we do is admonish him."
There are now six hijackers waiting to be repatriated in the camp, excluding Yuan Bin (
Lai said the couple behaves very well in the camp and that they are allowed to visit each other weekly.
The CIA has a message for Chinese government officials worried about their place in Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) government: Come work with us. The agency released two Mandarin-language videos on social media on Thursday inviting disgruntled officials to contact the CIA. The recruitment videos posted on YouTube and X racked up more than 5 million views combined in their first day. The outreach comes as CIA Director John Ratcliffe has vowed to boost the agency’s use of intelligence from human sources and its focus on China, which has recently targeted US officials with its own espionage operations. The videos are “aimed at
STEADFAST FRIEND: The bills encourage increased Taiwan-US engagement and address China’s distortion of UN Resolution 2758 to isolate Taiwan internationally The Presidential Office yesterday thanked the US House of Representatives for unanimously passing two Taiwan-related bills highlighting its solid support for Taiwan’s democracy and global participation, and for deepening bilateral relations. One of the bills, the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act, requires the US Department of State to periodically review its guidelines for engagement with Taiwan, and report to the US Congress on the guidelines and plans to lift self-imposed limitations on US-Taiwan engagement. The other bill is the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, which clarifies that UN Resolution 2758 does not address the issue of the representation of Taiwan or its people in
US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo on Friday expressed concern over the rate at which China is diversifying its military exercises, the Financial Times (FT) reported on Saturday. “The rates of change on the depth and breadth of their exercises is the one non-linear effect that I’ve seen in the last year that wakes me up at night or keeps me up at night,” Paparo was quoted by FT as saying while attending the annual Sedona Forum at the McCain Institute in Arizona. Paparo also expressed concern over the speed with which China was expanding its military. While the US
DEFENDING DEMOCRACY: Taiwan shares the same values as those that fought in WWII, and nations must unite to halt the expansion of a new authoritarian bloc, Lai said The government yesterday held a commemoration ceremony for Victory in Europe (V-E) Day, joining the rest of the world for the first time to mark the anniversary of the end of World War II in Europe. Taiwan honoring V-E Day signifies “our growing connections with the international community,” President William Lai (賴清德) said at a reception in Taipei on the 80th anniversary of V-E Day. One of the major lessons of World War II is that “authoritarianism and aggression lead only to slaughter, tragedy and greater inequality,” Lai said. Even more importantly, the war also taught people that “those who cherish peace cannot